Jump to content

Biggio, Smoltz, Martinez, Johnson - HOF


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Welcome to immortality. The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/HOF2015?src=hash">#HOF2015</a> electees: Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, John Smoltz and Craig Biggio. <a href="http://t.co/yAMmKkiePK">pic.twitter.com/yAMmKkiePK</a></p>— MLB (@MLB) <a href="

">January 6, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Big Unit was the top vote getter at 97.3% Piazza at 69.9% in 5th place.

Also

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Mike Mussina received 24.6 percent of the votes, a slight increase from last year <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">January 6, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Schilling gets 39.2 percent -- beats Clemens and Bonds</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 6, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piazza at 69.9 percent. He will get there in a year or two. Smoltz getting twice the support of Schilling and three times the support of Mussina remains a mystery to me. All three should be in the Hall of Fame, but Smoltz is probably third of the three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for who they let in they got it right. I'm both surprised and not surprised that Smoltz got in on the first ballot. He deserved to be there, as did Glavine, although coincidentally both have career WAR's that were less than Mussina and Schilling and neither of those two was anywhere near induction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mussina needs to make a big jump next year considering the lack of a strong starting candidate.

I don't think it bodes well for him that Schilling had a big bump and he didn't.

There are a lot of guys who are going to wait a long time. Maybe even until the keys to the front door are changed, or the latest version of the back door becomes an option for them. Mussina is the Duke Snider of this ballot, and Duke Snider had to wait 17 years to get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I scoff at all the talk about how the writers are starting to study the numbers, and wrestling with their decisions. There is still the popularity factor as well. Case in point, Jon Heyman voted for Mattingly. Smoltz is a media guy now, so he's even more likable than he was as a player. Mussina was not as personable with the media, so he still waits while Smoltz goes first ballot.

Obviously we still have the yeahoos who won't put a player in on the first ballot. 15 writers decided that a pitcher with 303 wins, 4,875 strikeouts, and 5 Cy Youngs (along with 2 2nd place and 1 3rd place finish) was not Hall worthy.

Randy Johnson's kryptonite

pg2_g_reboulet_200.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I scoff at all the talk about how the writers are starting to study the numbers, and wrestling with their decisions. There is still the popularity factor as well. Case in point, Jon Heyman voted for Mattingly. Smoltz is a media guy now, so he's even more likable than he was as a player. Mussina was not as personable with the media, so he still waits while Smoltz goes first ballot.

Obviously we still have the yeahoos who won't put a player in on the first ballot. 15 writers decided that a pitcher with 303 wins, 4,875 strikeouts, and 5 Cy Youngs (along with 2 2nd place and 1 3rd place finish) was not Hall worthy.

Some of them excluded him so they could support other players who needed the votes more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I scoff at all the talk about how the writers are starting to study the numbers, and wrestling with their decisions. There is still the popularity factor as well. Case in point, Jon Heyman voted for Mattingly. Smoltz is a media guy now, so he's even more likable than he was as a player. Mussina was not as personable with the media, so he still waits while Smoltz goes first ballot.

Obviously we still have the yeahoos who won't put a player in on the first ballot. 15 writers decided that a pitcher with 303 wins, 4,875 strikeouts, and 5 Cy Youngs (along with 2 2nd place and 1 3rd place finish) was not Hall worthy.

Yeah, that blows my mind. Seems like that one should have been unanimous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mussina needs to make a big jump next year considering the lack of a strong starting candidate.

I don't think it bodes well for him that Schilling had a big bump and he didn't.

It's pretty obvious that Schilling will get in before Mussina does, if either of them ever gets in. Having Johnson, Pedro and Smoltz cleared away helps. There are no new top-level starting pitchers eligible for a few years now. Andy Pettitte becomes eligible four years from now. Until him, nobody, and nobody for a few years after him, either. By the way, if Pettitte gets in and Mussina doesn't, I'll barf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty obvious that Schilling will get in before Mussina does, if either of them ever gets in. Having Johnson, Pedro and Smoltz cleared away helps. There are no new top-level starting pitchers eligible for a few years now. Andy Pettitte becomes eligible four years from now. Until him, nobody, and nobody for a few years after him, either. By the way, if Pettitte gets in and Mussina doesn't, I'll barf.

Halladay has a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • He could be making minor changes just like Holliday. Minor leagues where you can iron things out. It made more sense after I saw Bryan Baker. He obviously was working on that new curveball and it inflated his ERA first month.
    • 1. If you re-read my post, you'll see that I acknowledged Elias' position at the time in the very first sentence.  I didn't say Elias directed the trade.  I'm very much saying that Elias' experience with the Astros is going to inform his actions with the Orioles. 2.  At the time, Perez, Cameron and Rogers were the Astros' #3, #9 and #11 prospects respectively per Sports Illustrated.  Not nothing, especially considering the salary relief the Tigers were getting.  For context, Orioles #3 is Basallo. 3. The Verlander trade literally came together in the last hour before the trade deadline.  What comparable pitcher will be available this year is unanswerable until around the last week of July at the earliest as teams evaluate their post-season prospects up until the last minute. Behind my original post is the recognition that this season is different in at least two important respects.  First, the O's are unequivocally a contender and that requires Elias to widen his approach as a general manager.  Secondly, the new ownership is a lot more like Jim Crane than John Angelos ever was, so taking on an expensive contract for the right player is now something that can be considered.  
    • That's a good one! I didn't think about him.
    • Mid-month the K/BB is at 22/4 after 20/12 and 19/12 in April/May. 1190, 964, 805 the monthly OPS's.    Boredom?   Regression?
    • I’m use to looking at top prospects like Almeyda, Tavera, Maikol struggle at this level. Early on this is by far the best DSL team I’ve followed. 
    • De Grom if he comes back healthy?  Not sure why Rangers would trade him, it would be risky to take on his contract.  Could he be starting by trade deadline?  3+ years left on deal 
    • Tonight's game is being managed by the same guy who brought in Joakim Soria to face Delmon Young.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...