Jump to content

2015 1st A (36) - Ryan Mountcastle - SS - Hagerty HS (FL)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From RZNJ's post in the main draft thread:

Mountcastle stands out most for his hitting ability. He has tremendous bat speed leads to elite exit velocity when he squares balls up, giving him above-average power. He has a loose swing and does a good job of making adjustments to make consistent contact. Defensively, Mountcastle isn't as advanced.

Big power potential with this kid...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mountcastle was not rated as high as you might expect for a player being drafted at #36. He was 122nd on the Baseball America 500, 108th on the Fangraphs list, and not ranked at all on the top 125 list published by Baseball Prospectus. That being the case, one has to wonder whether this is a pick that's meant to save money to use it elsewhere. Of course, it's also possible that the Orioles saw him more than others and liked him better than other teams.

After the pick was made, the TV crew on MLB Network noted that Mountcastle is likely destined for either third base or the outfield, but they praised "lightning-quick bat speed."

The slot value for this pick is $1,711,900. Mountcastle is committed to Central Florida.

http://www.camdenchat.com/2015/6/8/8749731/mlb-draft-results-2015-orioles-pick-ryan-mountcastle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a fan of this assessment :)

Ryan Mountcastle is not a future shortstop. I don't know where he will play. I don't really care where he will play. Probably 3B or a corner OF spot but what I do care about is the bat. Mountcastle has impressive bat speed. He doesn't have the cleanest swing but he hits line drives from line to line and has the raw power to hit plenty of home runs. He hit well in the games I've seen him and I have a lot of faith that he will be one of the better hitters in the draft. He has a good arm, good enough for 3B and he has enough foot speed to be useful as a corner OF. If he goes to school, he is committed to UCF but I don't think he'll get there.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2015/5/10/8576317/2015-mlb-draft-shortstops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading everything, this kid has a little bit of upside. If the O's can save a little money here and use it elsewhere then I'm fine with this. I like the fact that the O's are going after bats. Lord knows they need some hitters in their system. I like to see the Orioles put him in right field and try him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">With the No. 36 pick in the 2015 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MLBDraft?src=hash">#MLBDraft</a>, the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> select Ryan Mountcastle, SS from Hagerty HS (FL). <a href="http://t.co/BNcHdrzhip">pic.twitter.com/BNcHdrzhip</a></p>— Baltimore Orioles (@Orioles) <a href="

">June 9, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading everything, this kid has a little bit of upside. If the O's can save a little money here and use it elsewhere then I'm fine with this. I like the fact that the O's are going after bats. Lord knows they need some hitters in their system.

Agree with this. I think money savings has to be something of a factor here for a somewhat under the radar prospect to go this early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given what I'm reading about him as a hitter, I'm surprised that he's not ranked higher.

That's a little odd to me too. Nothing I have read questions his bat; everything essentially says that he has an exceptionally quick bat that could produce a lot of power. He may not have a position yet, but everybody seems to think he will hit. I will gladly take that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball draft rankings are hilarious. Remember Sisco was well underrated. Now he's 19 and catching at Frederick. I like the assessments on this guy. Our organization has been really good with the guys coming up being able to play defense.

Stotle mentioned McCarthy from UVA as a possibility in the next few rds. After watching the Terps series, I'd love that pick too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think the O's would have drafted him this high in the draft if they didn't have an assurance that he would "sign". Appears to have a lot of "upside". Just gotta trust that the O's scouting department has done their due diligence in evaluating this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Notwithstanding age and position, I think I'm still on Team Adley for priority 1. One of the management talking points is around avoiding the risk of "creating complacency" when a ballplayer good enough to rate it gets their forever fortune. I think the other side of that being too stingy is "creating resentment" in your labor force. Burnes is an interesting cat as he's taken some actions that real world illustrate how created resentment looks in the cliches only constrained world of ballplayers and clubs interacting with media. I think Elias/Sig modeling a healthy respect for the opportunity Burnes has just about earned himself might help even if they know today their recommendation to ownership is an aggressive chase that already has the green light.     Information how Burnes fares the next 4-5 months is valuable, especially how his stuff plays against the best of the best once he's 30.     Fun fact ALCS Game 7 could fall 10.22.2024 precisely on Burnes' 30th birthday.   
    • Is Rich Hill an option? I believe he was looking to sign with someone mid year. Would we consider him?
    • They bring them up because we need to have guys on the bench available to pinch hit, pinch run, substitute for injured players, or give somebody a rest.   It's not a matter of not believing in them.  Some will get chances to start and some won't.   Just because a guy is starting every day in AAA doesn't mean he should get a chance to start every day (or even most to the time) in the majors.
    • My source for the dates of the options is the Orioles.com transactions page.  I'm going to retract what I said about the 20 day rule, as I had misremembered it.  What it actually says is:  "If a Player is optionally assigned for a total of less than 20 days in one championship season, the Player shall be credited with Major League service during the period of such optional assignment(s); provided, however, that a Player shall not be credited with Major League service under this provision if the Player had zero days of Major League serv ice in the current season prior to the optional assignment and after the optional assignment was unconditionally released or assigned outright and not subsequently added to the Active List for the remainder of the championship season." So forget what I said about that.  Now, what I am not sure about is whether Vespi's recall to be the 27th man in St. Louis due to the suspended game counts towards his option total.   The answer to that isn't found in the CBA, but in a document called "Major League Rules" that used to be public, but apparently no longer is.   I am not talking about the document that describes the rules of play, but another document that contains, for example, the details of the "Rule 4 draft" and the "Rule 5 draft."
    • And is it fair to say 10-15 runs equates to about 1 to 1.5 wins? (Again, that's in a worst-order scenario.)
    • It’s a definite probable no for me. I don’t say that to split hairs.  So let me explain.    There is no way that the Orioles come out on an investment like the one it will take to extend Burnes. But would I, given his age and the likelihood of injury?  No.    Unless….I was prepared to spend twice that or more to land another pitcher on top of Burnes. The idea being if you’re in you’re in.    I cannot speak to the finances of the new ownership but the only way I would purchase someone like Burnes would be to buy 2 in hopes of having one. While still knowing the advantage if you have both and the risks of both are hurt.    Could the Orioles afford $600M? I don’t know.  Should any team?  No. But we live in a world where the Dodgers are spending Billions. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...