Jump to content

How many rookies will be on the 2016 O's 25 man roster?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Last year there was one. Rule 5 pick Jason Garcia.

This year I count 6 or 8 that have a chance.

1) Bundy either makes the team (probably as a reliever) or is on the DL.

2) Givens is almost a lock to have a spot in the pen.

3-4) Drake and Wilson have a good chance.

5) Mancini, Walker and Wilkins may be fighting for a 1B spot.

6) Alvarez has a shot with a good spring to be in the outfield in some fashion.

7) Wright has a spot at the pen though he or Wilson may be kept stretched in the rotation at AAA.

8) A Rule 5 pick is likely. Maybe a lefty handed 4th OF that has more upside than Lough.

What is your take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Technically Givens, Drake, Alvarez, Wilson and Wright were all rookies in 2015. They just didnt lose their rookie eligibility.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Clearly rookie status can stretch over two seasons if:

From Cots Contracts:

Rookie Qualification

A player is a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has:

more than 130 at-bats or 50 innings pitched in the Major Leagues, or

more than 45 days on a Major League active roster during the 25-man limit period (April-August), excluding time on the disabled list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year there was one. Rule 5 pick Jason Garcia.

This year I count 6 or 8 that have a chance.

1) Bundy either makes the team (probably as a reliever) or is on the DL.

2) Givens is almost a lock to have a spot in the pen.

3-4) Drake and Wilson have a good chance.

5) Mancini, Walker and Wilkins may be fighting for a 1B spot.

6) Alvarez has a shot with a good spring to be in the outfield in some fashion.

7) Wright has a spot at the pen though he or Wilson may be kept stretched in the rotation at AAA.

8) A Rule 5 pick is likely. Maybe a lefty handed 4th OF that has more upside than Lough.

What is your take?

1 - Agree

2 - Agree

3-4 - Agree

5 - I think emphasis on "may", sure, they could be, depending on the off-season results and how they do in ST.

6 - Not sure, how strong a "shot" he has, again, depends on DD and how Alvarez does in ST.

7 - Sure, there is a chance

8 - Not sure they have room for a rule 5 pick, this season. Lough is a very good 4th OF, more of an upside with the bat can be found, then you probably lose the "plus" defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 - Agree

2 - Agree

3-4 - Agree

5 - I think emphasis on "may", sure, they could be, depending on the off-season results and how they do in ST.

6 - Not sure, how strong a "shot" he has, again, depends on DD and how Alvarez does in ST.

7 - Sure, there is a chance

8 - Not sure they have room for a rule 5 pick, this season. Lough is a very good 4th OF, more of an upside with the bat can be found, then you probably lose the "plus" defense.

If Drake is minor league reliever of the year and does not get a shot, we are not thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly rookie status can stretch over two seasons if:

From Cots Contracts:

Rookie Qualification

A player is a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has:

more than 130 at-bats or 50 innings pitched in the Major Leagues, or

more than 45 days on a Major League active roster during the 25-man limit period (April-August), excluding time on the disabled list.

So technically there was more than 1 rookie on the team in 2015.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Drake is minor league reliever of the year and does not get a shot, we are not thinking.

He had a good year in 44 innings including many in Harbor Park, but Minor League Reliever of the Year doesn't mean he's a lock to be Trevor Hoffman. I'm sure they'll evaluate him and give him a reasonable shot depending on who is on the roster in March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had a good year in 44 innings including many in Harbor Park, but Minor League Reliever of the Year doesn't mean he's a lock to be Trevor Hoffman. I'm sure they'll evaluate him and give him a reasonable shot depending on who is on the roster in March.

I expect to see him on the Baltimore-Norfolk shuttle all season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some other recent minor league (or AAA) relievers of the year: Jermaine Van Buren, Rob Delaney, Rob Delaney (again), Dan Runzler, Jonathan Albaladejo, and Nick Wittgren. That's more depressing than I thought. It's almost like being named MiLB reliever of the year precludes you from having a MLB career.Nick Dan RunRo , That

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...