Jump to content

Lefty Chris Lee, RHPS Andrew Triggs, and Parker Bridwell were added to the 40 man roster today


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Add me to the list of those unhappy to see Triggs released. To see this move following release of Berry makes no sense for a team starved for pitching. And today we get lit up by mighty Minnesota. What in hell is going on with this front office?

Bridwell looked pretty good. How is Berry doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff Sullivan of fangraphs:

Triggs and Givens were teammates with Bowie. Givens closed early on, while Triggs was more of a long man. Something interesting happened when Givens was promoted to Baltimore. Triggs took over as the closer, getting shorter assignments, and where before he had nine walks and 27 strikeouts, afterward he had two walks and 43 strikeouts. His pitches per appearance were cut in half, and he responded by throwing more strikes and becoming overall less hittable. Triggs was pretty good early, but over his last 32 outings, he gave up four runs. He allowed four doubles, no triples, and no homers. It’s true that Triggs was a 26-year-old repeating Double-A, but mastery is mastery.

That mastery is what made me notice Andrew Triggs, as a kind of minor-league version of Givens and Zych. That mastery made me a fan, and I assumed that mastery would take Triggs all the way up to the Orioles at some point. As an organization, they appreciate unusual relievers, and late last year the team protected Triggs from the Rule 5 draft. I’m surprised, then, that Triggs was released in the middle of spring training, and I have to imagine there were better release candidates. Maybe that’s just my own bias, but it seems to me that Triggs has plenty to offer, and it seems to me that Triggs will force his way up to the majors with the A’s, given sufficient health. I know that this is a small thing. I know that even a sunny career outcome would leave Triggs as just a moderately successful big-league reliever. Andrew Triggs isn’t going to ever have a plaque made for the Hall of Fame, but as waiver moves go, I love this one. He’s not helping in the majors just yet. It ought to be a matter of very little time.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/my-favorite-quiet-waiver-claim/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still a mystery that we would release a guy with such dominant numbers (albeit in AA) and still hold onto a guy like Uruttia, who is clearly over-matched at the Major League level.

I like Henry but couldn't agree more. Our 40-man roster management this offseason has been bad. Lost two lefties and now he's trying to trade for one, genius!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Henry but couldn't agree more. Our 40-man roster management this offseason has been bad. Lost two lefties and now he's trying to trade for one, genius!

To be fair, DD is looking for a lefty starter, not a reliever. We have Britton, Matusz and McFarland as staples, and Additon, Believeau, Cabral, Oliver and Tolliver also available as lefties in relief. Triggs may turn out to be better than some of those, but it's not like we don't have options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

o

Bridell threw 4 shutout innings, throwing only 34 pitches.

In the 5th, he went to the other extreme ...... he walked 3 batters, threw a wild pitch, allowed 2 runs, and needed 23 pitches to get through the inning.

He gave up another run in the 6th before being taken out with 2 outs, and a runner on 2nd base.

17 OUTS: 5 Popouts, 4 Lineouts, 3 Groundouts (Including 2 Double Plays), 1 Strikeout, 1 Flyout, 1 Lineout

PARKER ALAN BRIDWELL O (vs. AA-Harrisburg, 4/22)

IP:l 5.67

H:;; 5 l(3 Doubles, 2 Singles)

R:l) 3

BB: 4

SO: 1

Pitches: 71 (41 Strikes, 30 Balls)

2016 ERA: 5.79 l(AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

81 (51 Strikes, 31 Balls)

81 (51 Strikes, 31 Balls)

71 (71 Strikes, 01 Balls)

11 (61 Strikes, 51 Balls)

23 (11 Strikes, 12 Balls)

14 (71 Strikes, 71 Balls) *

* Bridwell recorded 2 outs before departing in the 6th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

1 earned run over 5.33 innings.

16 OUTS: 5 Groundouts, 5 Flyouts, 3 Strikeouts, 2 Lineouts, 1 Popout

PARKER ALAN BRIDWELL O (vs. AA-Harrisburg, 4/29)

IP:l 5.33

H:;; 2 l(1 Triple, 1 Single)

R:l) 3

ER:)1

BB: 4

SO: 3

Pitches: 78 (49 Strikes, 29 Balls)

2016 ERA: 4.19 l(AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

20 (11 Strikes, 91 Balls)

24 (13 Strikes, 11 Balls)

12 (81 Strikes, 41 Balls)

71 (61 Strikes, 11 Balls)

51 (51 Strikes, 01 Balls)

10 (61 Strikes, 41 Balls) *

* Bridwell recorded 1 out before departing in the 6th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

18 OUTS: 9 Groundouts, 5 Flyouts, 2 Strikeouts, 1 Popout, 1 Thrown Out Going From 1st to 3rd on a Single

PARKER ALAN BRIDWELL O (vs. AA-Richmond, 5/04)

IP:l 6 - PLUS

H:;; 6 l(1 Double, 5 Singles)

R:l) 1

BB: 2

SO: 2

Pitches: 88 (59 Strikes, 29 Balls)

2016 ERA: 3.55 l(AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

71 (51 Strikes, 2 Balls)

16 (11 Strikes, 5 Balls)

11 (81 Strikes, 3 Balls)

11 (71 Strikes, 4 Balls)

23 (15 Strikes, 8 Balls)

14 (11 Strikes, 3 Balls)

61 (21 Strikes, 4 Balls) *

* Bridwell did not record any outs before departing in the 7th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

2 earned runs over 5.67 innings pitched.

5 free passes (all walks.)

17 OUTS: 6 Groundouts (Including 1 Double Play), 4 Lineouts, 2 Strikeouts, 2 Flyouts, 1 Popout, 1 Thrown Out at Home Plate

PARKER ALAN BRIDWELL O (vs. AA-Hartford, 5/11)

IP:l 5.67

H:;; 6 l(1 Home Run, 1 Double, 4 Singles)

R:l) 4

ER:)2

BB: 5

SO: 2

Pitches: 91 (52 Strikes, 39 Balls)

2016 ERA: 3.48 l(AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

14 (10 Strikes, 41 Balls)

14 (91 Strikes, 51 Balls)

12 (81 Strikes, 41 Balls)

14 (71 Strikes, 71 Balls)

16 (61 Strikes, 10 Balls)

21 (12 Strikes, 91 Balls) *

* Bridwell recorded 2 outs before departing in the 6th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Ok, let’s try not to be stupid(I’m pretty sure you can accomplish this). Answer one simple question.  (And way to be ignorant and not acknowledge the rest of what I said, not that I would expect any different since you are clearly in love with Povich or something)   If you don’t consistently throw strikes, do you think you can succeed in the majors as a starting pitcher?
    • Thanks, as always for the list.  Minor quibbles.   Carter Baumler?   Is it all about the bonus?   When I saw video from the AFL it was 91-93 with a decent curve and change.  I’d take Chace, Nunez, Young, and Forret  all over him on talent and  they all, including Young, have a better chance of not breaking down. Prediction.  Etzel will be close to top 10 by August.
    • The swinging strikeout on the 0-2 pitch from Luis Gil at his eyeballs was pretty conspicuous last night about an hour after checking these numbers and not having realized day to day how aggressive he has gotten while hitting .320. In contrast to the Adam/Manny led teams, I feel a lot more confidence in this lineup's ability to adapt as the year goes along.    Across the 2012-2016 postseasons, BAL hit 209/261/303 for a 56 wRC+, third worst of the 21 Clubs earning tournament appearances in that era. Jeff Passan's story this morning lamenting the April UmpShow had a detail Gunnar's punched out looking 4 times on missed calls - that's about 10% of his strikeouts YTD.  
    • I thought the sliding catch was a play he made look much harder than it should have been.   
    • 😂  Mr. Boxscore strikes again.  65% thru 5 complete.  12-21 in the 6th. 
    • Maybe that’s the case but the promotion doesn’t state that things are different for premium games.
    • Baumann is the most frustrating pitcher.  If you watch him on a good day (like yesterday), he looks like an elite reliever.   Other days, he’s throwing meatball after meatball.  Some days, he starts off great and then suddenly starts tossing cookies.   You literally never know what you’re getting with him.  There’s this feeling that if he could harness his stuff consistently, he could be a very solid back end reliever.   But he doesn’t harness his stuff consistently, and it’s not like he hadn’t had a lot of chances to do it.  I won’t lose any sleep if he’s DFA, but I think they’ll pick Ramírez if they go the DFA route.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...