Jump to content

Dillon Tate - RHP - 2018 #17 Prospect

Tony-OH

By Tony-OH
in Minors

 Share

Recommended Posts

Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted

I’m going to be interested to see what the new management does with Tate.    As noted in the write-up, the O’s brass converted him from a strikeout guy to a ground ball guy, with mixed results.    I’m not sure if the new guys will want Tate to stick with that approach.   Tate strikes me as a guy who might benefit from some good analytic information to help him hone his game.    

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luke-OH Hangout Grand Counsel

Luke-OH

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m going to be interested to see what the new management does with Tate.    As noted in the write-up, the O’s brass concerted him from a strikeout guy to a ground ball guy, with mixed results.    I’m not sure if the new guys will want Tate to stick with that approach.   Tate strikes me as a guy who might benefit from some good analytic information to help him hone his game.    

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LookitsPuck Hangout Grand Counsel

LookitsPuck

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m going to be interested to see what the new management does with Tate.    As noted in the write-up, the O’s brass converted him from a strikeout guy to a ground ball guy, with mixed results.    I’m not sure if the new guys will want Tate to stick with that approach.   Tate strikes me as a guy who might benefit from some good analytic information to help him hone his game.    

I hope new management tells Tate to forget everything the Orioles taught him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

I hope new management tells Tate to forget everything the Orioles taught him.

I think one of the interesting things to watch is whether the new guys will be able to use their analytic tools to improve the performance of players who are already in our system.   Especially the pitchers.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Legend_Of_Joey Hangout Grand Counsel

Legend_Of_Joey

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sending a message I'm guessing.

No way he's on the 40 this offseason right?

Not sure about "sending a message." He was on the IL for a good amount (about a month,) so this seems like their "minor league rehab" stuff works (see: Hays, Austin and Diaz, Yusniel.)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
ChuckS Hangout Grand Counsel

ChuckS

Posted
Posted

Dillon Tate has looked a lot better since being moved to the Bowie bullpen.  Since then he has pitched 9 and 2/3 innings and has given up 2 ER while striking out 11 and walking only 1.  

If he continues to be dominant in a relief role I'd like to see him in Norfolk by August and hopefully gets a September call-up.  He will be 26 in May of 2020.  Need to see if he's worth a spot on the 40.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MurphDogg Hangout Grand Counsel

MurphDogg

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Dillon Tate has looked a lot better since being moved to the Bowie bullpen.  Since then he has pitched 9 and 2/3 innings and has given up 2 ER while striking out 11 and walking only 1.  

If he continues to be dominant in a relief role I'd like to see him in Norfolk by August and hopefully gets a September call-up.  He will be 26 in May of 2020.  Need to see if he's worth a spot on the 40.  

I agree. It looks like he is either a reliever or needs to lose his 40-man roster spot. Should figure it out over the last three months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aristotelian Hangout Grand Counsel

Aristotelian

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, ChuckS said:

Dillon Tate has looked a lot better since being moved to the Bowie bullpen.  Since then he has pitched 9 and 2/3 innings and has given up 2 ER while striking out 11 and walking only 1.  

If he continues to be dominant in a relief role I'd like to see him in Norfolk by August and hopefully gets a September call-up.  He will be 26 in May of 2020.  Need to see if he's worth a spot on the 40.  

I wouldn't mind seeing him sooner than that. We can use the help.

 

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/index.php?/topic/35366-wow-this-bullpen-reeks/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • forphase1
      Coby Mayo 2024

      By forphase1 · Posted

      I agree, except for the 'gotta find a taker for Urias'.  We should NOT refuse to improve the team just because we can't unload Urias on someone.  Sure, I'd MUCH rather trade him and get some value for him.  But if no one wants him or isn't willing to give us anything for him, I'm not keeping Mayo in the minors just because I'm not willing to cut Urias.  Trade him IF we can, cut him if we must.  But let's get Mayo's bat in the lineup.  
    • Chromehill
      Re-visiting Luzardo

      By Chromehill · Posted

      I am not sure why the Orioles would make a trade for Luzardo in the next few weeks.  Luzardo has too many question marks regarding his ability to help the Orioles this year.   Any prospects dealt in the next few weeks should for players who can get the Orioles win the World Series this year.  If they strengthen the Orioles for 2025 and beyond, great.   If the Marlins will give up Luzardo for pennies on the dollar, then go get him.  
    • Sports Guy
      Re-visiting Luzardo

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      I think I may. When I originally made this post, I honestly didn’t realize he wasn’t going to be back until mid to late August. That really hurts the time frame for him to get his value up for the offseason. I mean, it could get higher imo, I’m not doubting that. But if it was at peak in the offseason and he’s 70 cents on the dollar now, how much will it go up after making 6-8 more starts? 80 cents on the dollar?  Does that increase warrant keeping him and risking that it doesn’t drop more? I don’t think the deal I offered is a slap in the face offer but I do think it’s an offer that has good but not great upside. How much you believe in Stowers and Norby obviously matters here. However, it gives them good depth, immediate ML help and several years of control.    But I could definitely see Miami wanting a better headliner and less quantity..I’m just doubtful they can get that unless they hold onto him for another year and hope he stays healthy and performs well. If he does, he can make back that trade value at that time. But, as we saw with cease, sometimes the risk just isn’t worth it and you have to take the best deal you can.  
    • RZNJ
      Re-visiting Luzardo

      By RZNJ · Posted

      Yes.
    • RZNJ
      Re-visiting Luzardo

      By RZNJ · Posted

      We know the real answer.  Let’s see if we get it.  Lol
    • Safelykept
      The 2024 Trade Deadline

      By Safelykept · Posted

      Those guys would cost who else, whos the headliner
    • RZNJ
      Re-visiting Luzardo

      By RZNJ · Posted

      Right.  SG wants to get a bargain.  Even if Luzardo’s arm falls off after the trade, he didn’t give up one player it hurts to part with.      No reason for the Marlins to sell low unless they think Luzardo never bounces back close to the 2023 level.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...