Jump to content

2019 AAA-Norfolk Tides


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Spl51 said:

There are people who still care that we traded Mike Yastrzemski for Tyler Herb? My god, I don't know what to say.

Not my main point, as Frobby said, but when you see Yaz playing for the Giants and Herb giving up seven runs in three innings at Norfolk it made me think of it. Sorry it was so upsetting for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Wanted to post this somewhere now that the final numbers are in, figured this thread was good enough. AAA home runs were up 57 percent this season.

The IL average OPS jumped from .709 to .787, runs per game jumped from 4.16 to 5.15.

I wonder if the MLB ball will get unjuiced next season.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Wanted to post this somewhere now that the final numbers are in, figured this thread was good enough. AAA home runs were up 57 percent this season.

The IL average OPS jumped from .709 to .787, runs per game jumped from 4.16 to 5.15.

I wonder if the MLB ball will get unjuiced next season.

I would think it has to be de-juiced next season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Wanted to post this somewhere now that the final numbers are in, figured this thread was good enough. AAA home runs were up 57 percent this season.

The IL average OPS jumped from .709 to .787, runs per game jumped from 4.16 to 5.15.

I wonder if the MLB ball will get unjuiced next season.

I know Keegan Akin's surface stats seemed meh, but this inspired me to take my first look at the IL pitching leaders for the season and it appears he finished 6th in the league in ERA.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_pit&lid=117

Just using the 2018/2017 links off that page, last year's 6th place ERA was 2.87, 2017's was 3.03.  I knew the home runs were flying out, but don't think I'd gotten as far in my thinking that a 4.75 in AAA this year is....not too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I know Keegan Akin's surface stats seemed meh, but this inspired me to take my first look at the IL pitching leaders for the season and it appears he finished 6th in the league in ERA.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_pit&lid=117

Just using the 2018/2017 links off that page, last year's 6th place ERA was 2.87, 2017's was 3.03.  I knew the home runs were flying out, but don't think I'd gotten as far in my thinking that a 4.75 in AAA this year is....not too bad.

Yeah, it's an important thing to consider, especially when comparing him to the guys pitching at Bowie. I've mentioned this in various threads throughout the year in regards to Akin. The Eastern League played as a very pitcher-friendly league, to the point that Rylan Bannon's .740 OPS in Bowie had the same wRC+ (120) as his .893 OPS in Norfolk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I know Keegan Akin's surface stats seemed meh, but this inspired me to take my first look at the IL pitching leaders for the season and it appears he finished 6th in the league in ERA.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_pit&lid=117

Just using the 2018/2017 links off that page, last year's 6th place ERA was 2.87, 2017's was 3.03.  I knew the home runs were flying out, but don't think I'd gotten as far in my thinking that a 4.75 in AAA this year is....not too bad.

To say he finished 6th in the league in ERA is a bit misleading.   I think only 15 pitchers threw enough innings in the IL to qualify, a function of the fact that many pitchers there shuttle back and forth to the majors.     He had a 4.73 ERA in a league with a 4.89 ERA.     So, he was a hair better than average, but not a lot.    And his best pitching was in April/May when he pitched to a 3.70 ERA; for the remainder of the year he ballooned to 5.51.    Overall, I consider his year to be pretty disappointing.    He did lead the league in strikeouts, but he also led in walks and had many short starts.   

I’ll say this: I believe the O’s had him working on his secondary stuff all year, and that will explain some of the deterioration in his numbers.    There’s a decent chance that will pay dividends down the road.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’ll say this: I believe the O’s had him working on his secondary stuff all year, and that will explain some of the deterioration in his numbers.    There’s a decent chance that will pay dividends down the road.   

I watched more than half of his starts and yes he was throwing offspeed stuff in fastball counts more often, which inflated the walk count and probably shortened some starts. 

But I really didn't see any improvement in the quality or command of his slider or changeup. They were both previously effective pitches when he got ahead in counts and they continued to be. He can miss bats effectively with all three pitches, which is his strongest feature on the mound. 

His results seemed to mirror his velocity. When he was carrying good stuff (93-94, above average slider, the slider's quality seems to be intimately connected to arm speed), he was very good. When he didn't (89-92, fringe to average slider), he struggled. His velocity seemed to come and go throughout the season, it didn't seem to be a mechanical issue, perhaps something with his preparation, conditioning. He looked as fit as I'd seen him in April, but appeared to get noticeably softer as the season progressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2019 at 8:43 PM, Spl51 said:

There are people who still care that we traded Mike Yastrzemski for Tyler Herb? My god, I don't know what to say.

It wasn't my main point at the time, but what is so outrageous about being unhappy we gave up Yaz for a bad AAA pitcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Sticking with realistic expectations. 1. Beavers and Luis Sanchez for Tanner Scott Sanchez is 21 and can touch 100 but has more walks than innings at Aberdeen. 2. Bradfield for Carlos Estevez Is Mike Trout still in CF 2-3 years from now?   3. Norby and Baumeister for Fedde @Chicago White Sox  said he was good with either Beavers or Norby plus someone like Baumeister.   If I’m the WS I’d take Norby but whatever. Obviously, these can be adjusted but hopefully you get the general point.  Sure up the rotation and a big upgrade to the bullpen.  No top 4 prospects used.  Povich, McDermott, Johnson all kept.   Fedde under control for 2025. You have a playoff bullpen.  You have a rotation that can get you through the second half and make a push for the division title. You don’t have an ace type pitcher for game #3 in the playoffs.   We have no idea if the ace type pitchers we’ve talked about (Skubal and Crochet) will be healthy or effective (both will be in innings territory they’ve never been in before) in October.   The above deals give the team a solid chance without much risk.  
    • I’ll take the growing pains/mistakes/errors all day to get Mayo in the lineup. We just gotta find a taker for Urias.  Mayo has well earned the promotion. 
    • Ok, I did it. I moved Mayo to #1 because I believe in the bat so much. Holliday has been hitting well of late so I almost didn't do it, but I just think I'd trade Holliday before Mayo even though I would not trade either. Basallo still could be better then them both. Really the team has three #1 prospects. 1A, 1B, 1C. The only issues is the huge dropoff after the top three. No one wants to claim that #4 spot so I left Povich there. Povich should graduate here shortly anyways so hopefully someone will take that step forward and claim that #4 spot that Kjerstad graduate from. 
    • You can find a list of Orioles/Browns by numbers here: https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/uniform-numbers.shtml
    • LOL that’s embarrassing on my part. Thanks. 
    • Btw, this doesn’t give him a lot of time to build his value back up for the offseason. So, it’s still unlikely they get back anything close to what they would have in this past offseason. So, going off of the idea they won’t trade him for less, do they really want to hold onto him for another calendar year in hopes the value increases?  
    • I'm referring to Urias, who I posted about in my original post.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...