Jump to content

DJ Stewart 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, vatech1994 said:

Stewart can legitimately hit and run.  Both skills are there.  I think the outfield stuff is about the higher light standards and high flight paths in the bigs.  Buck used to talk about that a lot. I think he will be a solid defender.  All in all I like what I see with this guy.  

Man I get that people are attracted by his high motor Charlie hustle demeanor. I mean I like the guys attitude too.

but cmon he is a bumbling stumbling dissaster in the OF, he will never be a solid defender (assuming a definition of league average). With his bottom 10% arm strength even if he had average OF speed (he doesn't) he'd still be a below average (not solid) outfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Man I get that people are attracted by his high motor Charlie hustle demeanor. I mean I like the guys attitude too.

but cmon he is a bumbling stumbling dissaster in the OF, he will never be a solid defender (assuming a definition of league average). With his bottom 10% arm strength even if he had average OF speed (he doesn't) he'd still be a below average (not solid) outfielder.

Yea, that second paragraph is just not true.  He's got a better arm than Mancini, Mullins and Smith just to count orioles we have seen in the outfield this season.  The sprint data shows his speed is average for a CO (I'll agree that if you include CF he would drop to BA but I'm not sure why you would).  All the data and scouting reports show him to be average to slightly above in the outfield.  A very poor stretch of 10 games or so this season doesn't change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Man I get that people are attracted by his high motor Charlie hustle demeanor. I mean I like the guys attitude too.

but cmon he is a bumbling stumbling dissaster in the OF, he will never be a solid defender (assuming a definition of league average). With his bottom 10% arm strength even if he had average OF speed (he doesn't) he'd still be a below average (not solid) outfielder.

Wow, I've never heard someone be so consistently negative.  Is your basis of his defense, the one slip he had on a very wet surface?  What I've seen in Stewart is the player with the smartest at bats on the team - including Mancini - and probably the best batting eye on the team.  And the last game I saw, he made 2 outstanding catches and one very good running catch that he turned into a double-play because the runner at first didn't think he'd catch it.  He may have a weak arm - I don't know - but I haven't seen that make a difference so far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ruzious said:

Wow, I've never heard someone be so consistently negative.  Is your basis of his defense, the one slip he had on a very wet surface?  What I've seen in Stewart is the player with the smartest at bats on the team - including Mancini - and probably the best batting eye on the team.  And the last game I saw, he made 2 outstanding catches and one very good running catch that he turned into a double-play because the runner at first didn't think he'd catch it.  He may have a weak arm - I don't know - but I haven't seen that make a difference so far.  

I'm pretty sure he's been down on Stewart since the minute he was drafted.  I think he's the one that said the two guys the O's got for Matusz would have better careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

Wow, I've never heard someone be so consistently negative.  Is your basis of his defense, the one slip he had on a very wet surface?  What I've seen in Stewart is the player with the smartest at bats on the team - including Mancini - and probably the best batting eye on the team.  And the last game I saw, he made 2 outstanding catches and one very good running catch that he turned into a double-play because the runner at first didn't think he'd catch it.  He may have a weak arm - I don't know - but I haven't seen that make a difference so far.  

His arm isn't bottom 10% weak and he understands the concept of the cutoff man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Man I get that people are attracted by his high motor Charlie hustle demeanor. I mean I like the guys attitude too.

but cmon he is a bumbling stumbling dissaster in the OF, he will never be a solid defender (assuming a definition of league average). With his bottom 10% arm strength even if he had average OF speed (he doesn't) he'd still be a below average (not solid) outfielder.

According to Baseballsavant, his sprint speed is in the 59th percentile, a little short of average for corner outfielder but not far off. I would like to see a citation on his arm strength being bottom 10 percent..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

I mean I like the guys attitude too.

but cmon he is a bumbling stumbling dissaster in the OF, he will never be a solid defender (assuming a definition of league average). With his bottom 10% arm strength even if he had average OF speed (he doesn't) he'd still be a below average (not solid) outfielder.

Mullins has bottom 10% arm strength. Stewart’s arm is more playable in LF, but not bad. His speed is slightly above average. Therefore, I fully expect him to be an average to slightly above defender in the OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Wow, I've never heard someone be so consistently negative.  Is your basis of his defense, the one slip he had on a very wet surface?  What I've seen in Stewart is the player with the smartest at bats on the team - including Mancini - and probably the best batting eye on the team.  And the last game I saw, he made 2 outstanding catches and one very good running catch that he turned into a double-play because the runner at first didn't think he'd catch it.  He may have a weak arm - I don't know - but I haven't seen that make a difference so far.   

LOL, Stewart has become the 2019 Felix Pie, how about the pop up that was in the air for ~30 seconds that he dropped, you miss that one? How about his .973 fielding % in the minors, is that good for an OF'er?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me the jury’s out on his defense.   He made a couple of nice plays on Sunday.     I’ve seen some good throws and some mediocre ones.    And yes, he’s looked foolish a couple of times.    I just need to see more and also give him the chance to relax and adjust to playing in major league parks.    One thing is sure, he’s not a guy who makes it look easy.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Have you seen Mountcastle's arm in the outfield?

Just one clip throwing out the runner at home the other day (EDIT the clip above).  He throws it too high and not on a line.  Infielder arm, slinging 3/4's.  Not much of scouting take and just MHO.  And I have only seen Stewart's arm throwing back to the infield recently so my opinion is worth nada, zilch.  But it is MHO.  Whatever @Luke-OH says is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
    • Who are the Os top three? Burnes, GRod, and…….?
    • There never is going to be an “all in” year.   Elias made the mostly in move by getting Burnes and then the baseball gods decided to cut down Bradish, Means, and Wells.  Coulombe too.  The Dodgers are “all in” every single year.  1 WS trophy in a shortened season. Elias is going to make some moves but he’s not dipping into the top 3 prospects and maybe not even Kjerstad.   You can’t make a habit of trading guys with 6+ years of control for players with minimal amounts of control.  Yeah, this was the Burnes year and we got some bad luck.  Maybe we can still piece it together but Elias is only going to do that up to a point. As far as next year, who knows.  
    • I don't disagree at all.  I just put a much stronger emphasis on the top two guys in a series instead of three.  In most five game series your third starter will only pitch once.  Win the division and Kremer may make only 4 postseason starts even as our #3 all the way through the World Series.  That's why I would be focused on bullpen arms instead of a starter.  I love the idea of a starter with years of control to help offset the loss of Burnes to FA but I just don't see anyone that attractive that will be available.  This team's path through the AL is to have Burnes and Rodriguez be aces and the lineup to continue to be the best in the league regardless of who the third or fourth starters are.  
    • Your comment basically confirms what I said. You admit that Suarez and Irwin would regress, which they have. As a result of that regression, they are no longer reliable members of a powerful rotation. Therefore, we will slowly sink unless Mike gets someone better, and not just one, either. How is it an irrational fear to say we will slowly sink if we don’t make acquisitions? You just agreed that Suarez and Irwin aren’t adequate, so the concern is completely valid. Add to that Kremer’s spotty performance and injury concerns, and Povich remaining a huge question mark. Outside our top two, we got nobody dependable. And that’s just discussing the starters. your comment is curious because you try to refute what I was saying but instead confirm it, and you close by admitting they “have to improve on obvious needs”  We can debate what would constitute “going overboard,” but it’s clear from his past transactions that Mike cares a lot about the price he pays for an asset, so I think, far from overpaying, he’s more likely to duplicate what he did last season.
    • More should have been done to improve the team's rotation and Bullpen in the offseason.  Since John Angelos controlled the purse strings, additional spending was just not happening.  I put that on Angelos not Elias.  Does anyone think that Elias would not have liked say $30 million to add to 2024 payroll to strengthen the pitching?  This trade deadline is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias.
    • The Moose hits it!!!! Anyone who sets up their expectations to world series or bust needs good strong blood pressure meds. The year we win it will probably be a year we didn't expect. I'm enjoying the O's are relavent again after way to many years in the wilderness. Get to the dance and take your chances. That's my moto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...