Jump to content

Rylan Bannon 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Good stuff!  Luke-OH, have you watched any of Rylan's at bats in Norfolk?  Do you see anything different, or is it just a SSS and good luck streak?

I have, just being more aggressive early in the count than in Bowie, but remember a .740 in the Eastern League is just as good as a .880 OPS in the International League given their respective run environments this year. So I'm not sure he's been notably better.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I have, just being more aggressive early in the count than in Bowie, but remember a .740 in the Eastern League is just as good as a .880 OPS in the International League given their respective run environments this year. So I'm not sure he's been notably better.

Got you.  Thanks Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing Bannon needs to improve is that he has a tendency of turning easy plays into difficult plays in the field.

He's really comfortable throwing on the run, it's an ability that generally helps him, he's good at it. But sometimes he makes running throws when he has plenty of time to set his feet. And while he is a good thrower on the run, no one is perfect when their body is moving a different direction than the target. It leads to some slightly errant throws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

One thing Bannon needs to improve is that he has a tendency of turning easy plays into difficult plays in the field.

He's really comfortable throwing on the run, it's an ability that generally helps him, he's good at it. But sometimes he makes running throws when he has plenty of time to set his feet. And while he is a good thrower on the run, no one is perfect when their body is moving a different direction than the target. It leads to some slightly errant throws. 

So far he has 4 errors through...What, 10 games there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I have, just being more aggressive early in the count than in Bowie, but remember a .740 in the Eastern League is just as good as a .880 OPS in the International League given their respective run environments this year. So I'm not sure he's been notably better.

Luke - does the fact that Bannon is facing AAA pitching (ostensibly better than AA) affect your analysis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Luke - does the fact that Bannon is facing AAA pitching (ostensibly better than AA) affect your analysis?

I mean the higher level you do it at, the greater chance that the hit tool plays in the majors, but it doesn’t change the profile. If he keeps it up it decreases risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just writing about Bannon in Tony’s thread on the main board about who might be added to or dropped from the OH top 30.    He had Bannon listed as a possible player to be dropped.     That post was written just before Bannon got promoted.   I think Bannon has shown he belongs on the list.    Hopefully he keeps raking over the final week of the season.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I was just writing about Bannon in Tony’s thread on the main board about who might be added to or dropped from the OH top 30.    He had Bannon listed as a possible player to be dropped.     That post was written just before Bannon got promoted.   I think Bannon has shown he belongs on the list.    Hopefully he keeps raking over the final week of the season.    

Bannon was top 20 for me pretty easily before his promotion, but to be fair, when I talk to scouts, Bannon is really the only guy where my thoughts vary significantly from other evaluators, although one changed his opinion a little after he saw Bannon’s Eastern League all-star game batting practice and conceded that he does in fact have 50 raw power (something we’d previously disagreed about).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Bannon was top 20 for me pretty easily before his promotion, but to be fair, when I talk to scouts, Bannon is really the only guy where my thoughts vary significantly from other evaluators, although one changed his opinion a little after he saw Bannon’s Eastern League all-star game batting practice and conceded that he does in fact have 50 raw power (something we’d previously disagreed about).

Does his position change his ranking? Does it matter if he plays 2B or 3B?

2B is a less premium position, but his bat would definitely project better there. Not like we have a ton of upper level middle infield prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, WalkWithElias said:

Does his position change his ranking? Does it matter if he plays 2B or 3B?

2B is a less premium position, but his bat would definitely project better there. Not like we have a ton of upper level middle infield prospects. 

I think the only chance of him being a 50 is at 2B. I think he could definitely be a 45 at 2B and maybe at 3B. He’s better at 2B IMO and the bat plays better there.

 I also think it’d be easy for him to pick up LF/RF and be a non-SS super utility guy. Kind of like Cincinnati is using Josh VanMeter now. Bannon has a better glove, but probably less bat.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2019 at 4:18 PM, Luke-OH said:

I think the only chance of him being a 50 is at 2B. I think he could definitely be a 45 at 2B and maybe at 3B. He’s better at 2B IMO and the bat plays better there.

 I also think it’d be easy for him to pick up LF/RF and be a non-SS super utility guy. Kind of like Cincinnati is using Josh VanMeter now. Bannon has a better glove, but probably less bat.

Good call on Van Meter for the Rule 5. 

I see Bannon has adopted Mountcastle’s way of thinking.  Why walk when you can hit the ball out of the ballpark?  That’s a not a joke nor a knock.

This hot stretch at the end of the season might be keeping him in the OH top 30.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I completely agree with this.  Most of this damage has already been done.  Travel teams have ruined many kids and have left others far more susceptible to injury in the minors and majors.  
    • I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.
    • Just getting caught up here, so my first reaction to trading JW is NOOOOOO! However, I think most people around baseball would have to agree that he's a dude. He's become my favorite Oriole just because of his approach at the plate and also his workman-like attitude. Leaving out my preferences and putting on my front office hat I have to admit he would be attractive to other teams for his ability to play three positions in the IF and his steady performance with the bat. And unlike Holliday, he's proven himself.  While Holliday is the more high profile guy to other teams I'm not sure he's seen as more valuable. JW can play SS-has the arm for it-and he's versatile. I think Holliday could learn to play 2B but has neither the arm for 3B or SS. He likely has more range and as earlier stated by another poster, some team may want to try him at SS. Maybe that works, maybe it doesn't.  I feel like I'm making the case to keep JW and trade JH. Back to the question, which guy gets the Orioles what they need to be the favorite going into the playoffs? Number one pick or a guy who's a ML starter right now? Let's set that aside, maybe it's either one. Can either of them get us Skubal in the right package? Yes. That's the guy who IS a ML pitcher and who will move the needle. What's the package? Elias has earned some level of baseball knowledge with the Burnes trade and the trade that sent Bundy to the Angels when Elias first arrived. That one was even more evidence of his ability to read the tea leaves. So, I trust he'll make it work. I may not like the immediate results (i.e. trading Westy or Kjerstad), but if he can get Skubal in the right deal I'd make the deal. But Scherzer is a good back up and won't cost nearly as much.
    • 39 Yacqui Rivera - he was the PTBNL in the Scott/Sulser deal along with the comp pick.  Juan Nunez - he was the 3rd piece in the Jorge Lopez trade with the Twins along with Povich/Cano/4th piece
    • Yes of course, that was a typo. Westburg at 3B and Mayo at 1B
    • Matt Olson comes to mind but yes an extension is not relevant to the conversation.
    • One game or series at a time. Keep the players fresh with an off day with rotating basis . This summer heat is no joke 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...