Jump to content

2019 MLB Winter Meetings Grande Thread


weams

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Isn’t Cozart a good example of why it wasn’t smart to pay Villar $10 million?

He is a good example of why it might not make sense to sign Villar to a 3/$38M deal, not a 1/$10M deal. Cozart was entering his age 32 season when he signed that deal and he had consistently been a 2 WAR player in the 4 years before his really good age 31 season. Villar is only entering his age 29 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Isn’t Cozart a good example of why it wasn’t smart to pay Villar $10 million?

Not at all.  Cozart is a bad multi year contract that was hamstringing his teams ability to make another bad signing.  I would contend that holding Villar for the chance at acquiring a prospect who could accumulate even 2 bWAR is worth it. 

To be completely cynical I doubt the $10 million going into the owners pocket is going to give us that return on investment.  To be less cynical I doubt that $ going back into player development is going to return that investment.  Maybe if it goes into the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Not at all.  Cozart is a bad multi year contract that was hamstringing his teams ability to make another bad signing.  I would contend that holding Villar for the chance at acquiring a prospect who could accumulate even 2 bWAR is worth it. 

To be completely cynical I doubt the $10 million going into the owners pocket is going to give us that return on investment.  To be less cynical I doubt that $ going back into player development is going to return that investment.  Maybe if it goes into the draft.

We got a prospect for him though. Would paying him $5 million for a half season be worth some perceived chance at a better prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We got a prospect for him though. Would paying him $5 million for a half season be worth some perceived chance at a better prospect?

It depends on how many $5 million units Orioles' ownership have earmarked for gambling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question about how they calculate the luxury tax.  I know they don’t factor in deferments and take the yearly average.  But how does the following work?  Howie Kendrick signed a two year/10.5M deal.  But the second is a team option.  His first year is 4M, his second is 6.5M. They owe him $2.5M if they don’t exercise the option.  So he’s guaranteed $6.5M.  What is his number for luxury tax purposes?  I know you weren’t expecting math, but is it $6.5M or $5.25M or $4M?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

Sure it might take away a landing spot, but I still think Mancini is more closely tied with Castellanos. It just depends if there enough of a market. I like the idea of potentially having the best available bat and relief arm come trade deadline time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...looks like we all might need to lower our trade expectations for Mancini. Salaries are almost identical and Mancini’s under contract for an extra year, but Mazara is three years younger. 

White Sox acquired OF Nomar Mazara from the Rangers for OF Steele Walker.

This swap was agreed to late Tuesday night at the Winter Meetings in San Diego and has been made official following the necessary medical record review. Mazara posted a mostly underwhelming .268/.318/.469 batting line with 19 home runs and 66 RBI over 116 games for Texas in 2019 and has yet to hit more than 20 home runs in a major league season, but he is just 24 years old and could maybe blossom with a change of scenery. He also drew reported trade interest from the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Marlins, and Tigers.

 

 

I disagree with the comp here. Mazara has mostly plateaued as a player, maybe even regressed.  Mancini has arguably not reached his ceiling yet given his stat progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I disagree with the comp here. Mazara has mostly plateaued as a player, maybe even regressed.  Mancini has arguably not reached his ceiling yet given his stat progression.

So Mazara has plateaued at the age of 24 and Mancini has not at the age of 27 (soon to be 28)? That might be your belief, but I'm willing to bet that the White Sox are banking on the younger player having the potential for more upside. Mancini might be better offensively (right now), but I think Mazara's youth closes the value gap between the two quite a bit. Maybe the Orioles can get a bit more for Mancini, but if this is any gauge it's definitely not going to be a considerable haul unless a team is desperate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Sure it might take away a landing spot, but I still think Mancini is more closely tied with Castellanos. It just depends if there enough of a market. I like the idea of potentially having the best available bat and relief arm come trade deadline time. 

You don't think Mancini was made available before the trade deadline last season? Because I sure think he was. Agree with the Castellanos comparison, but it's not quite apples to apples because one is a free agent and one would need to be traded for. The Mazara comp isn't perfect, but I think it's probably as close as we're going to get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So Mazara has plateaued at the age of 24 and Mancini has not at the age of 27 (soon to be 28)? That might be your belief, but I'm willing to bet that the White Sox are banking on the younger player having the potential for more upside. Mancini might be better offensively (right now), but I think Mazara's youth closes the value gap between the two quite a bit. Maybe the Orioles can get a bit more for Mancini, but if this is any gauge it's definitely not going to be a considerable haul unless a team is desperate. 

I don’t think this is much of a gauge at all.    Mazara’s youth isn’t much of a factor since he’s only under team control for two more years.     It’s highly unlikely that he’ll improve enough in the next two years to be as good as Mancini over that period, plus as you noted Mancini is under control for an additional year.    Mancini's WAR last year was almost double Mazara’s WAR for his entire career.    

I don’t think Mancini would bring a giant haul in a trade, but Mazara is no measure of that IMO.
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Whether it is Juan Soto, Corey Seager or Yordan Alvarez, I think building a pen for the AL playoffs the Cionel guy will win tiebreaks over the Baumann guy this early. I hope they really get crowded out with multiple strong performers but if July only brings 1 fancy thing, Cionel and Coulombe can start preparing. If the big 3 starters hold together, even Means and Irvin get smushed to that role.
    • I wasn't even thinking of you, you little piece of trash.  You're insignificant on this board.  Nobody thinks about you or cares what you have to say.   I was referring to Sports Guys little laughing emoticon on the OP, which is passive aggressive, and I thought funny, because the OP was objectively accurate. GFY.
    • Hyde is saying it will be a six man rotation soon so arguably Irvin doesn't count. DFA Perez would have made it 5/2 among the "permanent" bullpen guys. Plus Perez has stretches when he is lights out. If he finds it at the right time he could be a weapon in October. 
    • Apparently, Cionel’s dad hasn’t entered Roy’s inner buddy circle.
    • While Adley is a valid data point, he had extenuating circumstances, and I still think Gunnar doesn't really qualify.  If you shifted Gunnar's stats from August/September 2022 to April 2023 and shifted the rest of his stats forward, then his slump would look like any old midseason slump.  A lot of players go through months where they OPS less than .700.  A lot of starters, especially shortstops struggle to have months where they OPS more than .700.  It doesn't seem noteworthy or indicative of rookie lumps.  If you combine his September 2022 stats with his April 2023 stats he was still an above-average hitter playing good defense at a premium defensive position.  Even during his slump, he was an overall average-player because of his position and defense, and he was 21.  A guy who I would more associate with rookie lumps would be Anthony Volpe; Gunnar's wRC+ in April was better than Volpe's full-season wRC+.
    • I’d say that would surprise me for a few  reasons.  First, it sounds like he’s already low in the defensive spectrum.  Sure, we can think of 1 first rounder (Kjerstad) who fit that bill but only 1.   Second, Law said White tends to chase out of the zone.  The O’s are very big on chase rates.   Third, I believe he’s a RH hitter.   Strike 3.
    • Meh, I think they’re both pretty replaceable but still trust Perez more. Since the beginning of last year, Perez has a 3.82 ERA, 3.80 FIP, 4.53 xFIP, and has been worth 0.5 WAR in 61.1 innings. Baumann has a 3.69 ERA, 4.41 FIP, 4.77 xFIP, and has been worth 0 WAR in 83 innings.  I do agree that Baumann being able to go multiple innings is beneficial, but it seemed like half the time they wanted to use him for multiple innings, he couldn’t throw strikes and then his outing ended early. Cionel’s 2022-2023 numbers definitely saved him (2.43 ERA), but he could easily be the next guy dropped from the BP.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...