Jump to content

Markakis on Astros: "Every Single Guy Needs a Beating"


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

All the evidence came from the players who were promised immunity. Even ignoring that, there’s no written rules and punishments in the CBA for violating sign stealing rules. So any punishment handed to the players would have been met with easily winnable grievances.

There was no route to players being punished for this.

Stop making sense.

The fact that this truth has been by in largely ignored by many in the media I find to be embarrassing. Right now it is all about piling on MLB and Manfred.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

All the evidence came from the players who were promised immunity. Even ignoring that, there’s no written rules and punishments in the CBA for violating sign stealing rules. So any punishment handed to the players would have been met with easily winnable grievances.

There was no route to players being punished for this.

Sometimes futile gestures are worthwhile if they’re loud enough and public enough. Especially if you’re taking a long-term view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PaulFolk said:Got it, so players getting injured in brawls is okay because some of them might suck. Good talk, thanks as always for your valuable input.

No that is not what I am saying at all.  I am saying that their injuries are probably not what caused them to never return.  Look I don’t care about brawls.  I have seen hundreds of hockey games. Tons at the minor league level.  I don’t think I ever saw an AHL game without multiple fights.  The player got five minute penalties and then came back on the ice. Not the end of the world about fights or brawls.  I know baseball players aren’t as tough as hockey players but  a few brawls isn’t a big deal,

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think ownership would be better off sacrificing Manfred.

Why?  He’s trying to make it go away as fast as possible with as little concrete consequence to ownership as possible. I predict he mostly succeeds. It's why I have my fingers crossed that the players crank up the volume, but I'm not holding my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Why?  He’s trying to make it go away as fast as possible with as little concrete consequence to ownership as possible. I predict he mostly succeeds. It's why I have my fingers crossed that the players crank up the volume, but I'm not holding my breath.

Because I don't think firing him hurts ownership at all.  I think their is a decent shot this blows over if they blame Manfred for mishandling it.  They could bring in a "law and order" type to be their agent of reform and then not change anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because I don't think firing him hurts ownership at all.  I think their is a decent shot this blows over if they blame Manfred for mishandling it.  They could bring in a "law and order" type to be their agent of reform and then not change anything.

Since when did adding complexity make something go away faster?  I think Babypowder's summary is fundamentally correct - that's why I suggested a futile gesture, not that I ever expected to see one from any baseball commissioner, be it Rob Manfred or anyone else.  The only way something real happens is if the players get loud enough to force the issue.  Unlikely IMO.  Better the devil you know... and already own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Since when did adding complexity make something go away faster?  I think Babypowder's summary is fundamentally correct - that's why I suggested a futile gesture, not that I ever expected to see one from any baseball commissioner, be it Rob Manfred or anyone else.  The only way something real happens is if the players get loud enough to force the issue.  Unlikely IMO.  Better the devil you know... and already own.

I think firing Manfred would be less complicated than pursuing players, and more satisfying for fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Since when did adding complexity make something go away faster?  I think Babypowder's summary is fundamentally correct - that's why I suggested a futile gesture, not that I ever expected to see one from any baseball commissioner, be it Rob Manfred or anyone else.  The only way something real happens is if the players get loud enough to force the issue.  Unlikely IMO.  Better the devil you know... and already own.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think firing Manfred would be less complicated than pursuing players, and more satisfying for fans.

Firing him and coming up with suspension guidelines for future cheating.  While Manfred is laying out rules for longer suspensions for beanings.  Yet he hasn’t said anything about coming up with cheating suspension lengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think firing Manfred would be less complicated than pursuing players, and more satisfying for fans.

Manfred isn't pursuing players and ownership isn't demanding that he does.  That's the point.  All indications are that fans would be most satisfied if the Astros' punishment was greater and bless the players for keeping the issue active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...