Jump to content

What if this is the next O's contending team?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

It's not.  If Cobb and Leblanc keep pitching alright then they'll be traded.  Same with any of the veteran guys in the bullpen. 

I'll give the team credit they play very hard but if the veteran pitchers get traded the staff becomes very young and will have growing pains.  If the start of the season has shown me anything so far, there's a possibility they found  diamonds in the rough with Rio, Alberto, and some of the bullpen guys like Sulser, Lakins, even Scott has looked better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To contend you generally need to be above average in several areas. This team may not be bottom of the barrel, especially with the chaos of the 2020 season leveling the playing field a bit, but they're still below average across the board. 

The most encouraging thing to me in one week of games is that Santander and Alberto appear not to be one-year wonders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this year, yes the O's do stand a good chance to compete for a playoff berth.  I haven't seen mentioned the wild card (pun intended) in all of this --- we may see more opportunities like this coming week against a depleted Marlins team due to COVID. Not unreasonable to think the O's can go 3-2 in the next five games (including today vs. TB).  7-5 through 20% of the season where 8 teams make the playoffs would be solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beantownrefugee said:

For this year, yes the O's do stand a good chance to compete for a playoff berth.  I haven't seen mentioned the wild card (pun intended) in all of this --- we may see more opportunities like this coming week against a depleted Marlins team due to COVID. Not unreasonable to think the O's can go 3-2 in the next five games (including today vs. TB).  7-5 through 20% of the season where 8 teams make the playoffs would be solid.

Good chance compared to a normal year.  Not a good chance compared to an actually talented team.  Right now they have a low single digit chance to make the playoffs, which is a lot better than the zero percent chance they would normally have.  But it's still not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

This is not our next contending team.   Could it fluke into a .500ish season and have a shot at making a 16-team playoff?    I wouldn’t rule that out completely, and I’d enjoy it, but I don’t think that makes them a contending team by my definition.    

Trading a pitcher like Richard Bleier is never a radical move, regardless of when it happens.    I liked the guy but he’s hardly an integral piece for a contending team.    On a good team he might be your 5th/6th best option out of the bullpen.
 

If a team makes the playoffs they are a contender. My definition.

When Bleier is healthy he has an ERA under 2.00.    I don't think many teams have 4 or 5 relievers better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense so far this year is 15th overall by WAR. Middling at best. 10th in wRC+, which is cool. It's early. K% is surprisingly low; fourth best in the league. 16th best for BB%.

On the bright side, the bullpen is actually fourth, if you can believe it. The bullpen ERA is extremely inflated, though, I think it will normalize. BUT, early returns have been okay. Top five in K/9, which is great.

The starting pitching is bottom five. Too many homeruns. That's really the telling story about this club. Without starting pitching you have nothing. No shot in the playoffs, if you can get there at all.

This team is probably better than I'd imagined, but I'd be impressed if they had a .500 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

The offense so far this year is 15th overall by WAR. Middling at best. 10th in wRC+, which is cool. It's early. K% is surprisingly low; fourth best in the league. 16th best for BB%.

On the bright side, the bullpen is actually fourth, if you can believe it. The bullpen ERA is extremely inflated, though, I think it will normalize. BUT, early returns have been okay. Top five in K/9, which is great.

The starting pitching is bottom five. Too many homeruns. That's really the telling story about this club. Without starting pitching you have nothing. No shot in the playoffs, if you can get there at all.

This team is probably better than I'd imagined, but I'd be impressed if they had a .500 season.

Probably will not have to be much better than .500 to make the playoffs with 16 teams getting in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Slappy said:

The 60 game and extra playoff format is key, and turns small sample sizes into important details. All it takes is one good month and one .500-ish month and we are playing postseason ball. In a full season we’d be exposed but we’ve already faced the best pitchers on the two best teams in our division and are still standing...

Yes. Expanded playoffs means a hot streak that would normally not mean much might just get it done. After living through 89 I will never say never about an Os team. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

Yes. Expanded playoffs means a hot streak that would normally not mean much might just get it done. After living through 89 I will never say never about an Os team. 

That 89 team sure made things interesting !

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of our position group,

C- Sisco/Severino.  Sisco no.  Severino has a decent shot, if he keeps up production at the plate, because his defense is lacking.  We are obviously looking at Rutschman  as the long term plan but a team always needs two catchers and we don't know how quickly Rutschman  is going to get here and play regularly.  Possibly Severino could win the starting role or platoon while Rustchman is brought along

1B - Mancini when he comes back, otherwise big hole.  

2B - Alberto.  Team control until 2023.  Pretty much locked in as regular 2B.

SS - Iglesias - one year deal with team option for 2021.  He's been raking but he likely gets swapped for prospects at some point before next year.  Velasquez no as he doesn't hit well.

3B - Ruiz. Team control until 2025.  Potential future starter.needs to keep  up production

LF - DSJ possible. He was OPS in the 800s in Toronto.  Fell off last year but has OPS around 800 this year.  DJ Stewart not looking too good. 

CF - Hays/Mullins   Hays had a great year last year but has started out slow this year.  Team control until 2026.   Mullins is almost strictly a pinch runner/backup.

RF- Santander.  Coming along fairly well. Team control until 2025.

DH - Nunez.  As he can't play the field well, it is hard to justify keeping him long term, unless he really started to rake at the plate whcih I find unlikely,. 

So of the position group, I'd say there's 5 maybe 6 guys who will be part of the long term plan.   Thats actually fairly promising, but we will definitely have to fill some holes.

Outside of Means, our starting rotation is older guys on short term contracts LeBlanc/Milone/Cobb/Wojo.  Cobb gets traded if he keeps pitching well.  Other guys are stopgaps.  They may play for a year or two more.  So we'll basically need four new starters by 2022, and thats assuming Means is there.

We have a few young bullpen arms such as Castro/Lakins/Scott.  Givens is 30, but has one more year of arb left.   After that, not sure if we will resign him.  Other guys are older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This guy pitched three no-hit innings against the O's back in April.
    • O'Hearn blatantly disregards the need to run up the starter's pitch count and lines a base hit on the first pitch.
    • I absolutely would not pay a price that includes Mayo and Basallo. Where are the instances recently as it relates to trades where a team gave up two top 15ish position player prospects for any pitcher? I bet they are very rare, and even less rare with pitcher injury rates being what they are. I get that the Tigers can play hard ball and don't "have" to trade Skubal. But I also know that is a risk for them in that he could get hurt and then have no trade value between no and next deadline. IMO the Tigers are not going anywhere with or without Skubal for the next few seasons. They simply don't have the position player talent/offense to be a serious contender. And there best prospects (while admittedly very good) are all in single A. That's why I don't think that Kjerstad holds much appeal for them. Because he doesn't really match their competitive timeline. I don't think any team would pay that kind of price for Skubal. IMO only the Phillies are in a position to offer that sort of package. Maybe Seattle? But neither of those teams need pitching. The Phillies are absolutely loaded as is in the pitching department. And Seattle does have enough offense to seriously challenge. Having said all that, I would certainly seriously consider surrendering one of Mayo/Basallo. But it would have to be in a type of deal like this where I get back a difference making starter who is cost controlled for more than one year. And yes to McDermott (absolutely). Now DeLeon is interesting in that he may have some serious upside. But if you believe in your International/Dominican academy/program, then you have to trust that you can find/farm more young/high upside arms like him.
    • Santander gets his first Coliseum homer in his last game there, wrapping one around the foul pole.  
    • I started yesterdays and that didn’t go well.  
    • Nobody’s started this?     For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Adley Rutschman C Anthony Santander RF Ryan O’Hearn 1B Jordan Westburg 2B Heston Kjerstad LF Ryan Mountcastle DH Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Grayson Rodriguez RHP For the Athletics JJ Bleday CF Miguel Andujar LF Brent Rooker DH Tyler Soderstrom 1B Shea Langeliers C Zack Gelof 2B Lawrence Butler RF Brett Harris 3B Max Schuemann SS Mitch Spence RHP
    • I think those two would be fine in order to get us through the regular season. My concern recently is at least one time through the rotation the last 4 times, we have had at least one blow up start thus taxing our bullpen. Those two would be fine in order to provide a much higher floor than some of our last three starters. However, I don't really think either does that much for us when the leaves change and the calender turns to October. If we are in an elimination game and either is on the mound against one of Seattle's starters, I think they would have the advantage. (Not that Seattle is a shoo-in for the playoffs.) But Philly and the Dodgers are most likely to get to the Series (which of course is no guarantee). And if we were to face either one, I don't like our chances against their top 3 with Fedde and/or Severino on the mound. Plus, I think we need protection at the top of the rotation in the instance that Burnes is to leave after this season. I'm not sure Grayson plus the rest of the non-Burnes guys that we have is even a rotation that qualifies for a playoff birth let alone wins a World Series. A lot of posters are clinging to our the stat that points to our team ERA being 5th in MLB. But if you like at how much it spiked in June and how high it is so far in July, it is clear that it is really going in the wrong direction.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...