Jump to content

O's-Marlins gametimes announced


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, survivedc said:

I went on the tour last year and I believe they said the outfield can drain 16 inches of rain an hour. That number sounds insane but I’m fairly certain that’s what they said.

Even if that’s inaccurate the tour is well worth it.

https://groundskeeper.mlblogs.com/how-do-baseball-fields-drain-so-fast-5a85a2b2fdd0
 

Found this from 2006, says fields can do 7-10 inches. Not 16 but still pretty incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bigger question is, when will the Marlins roster be announced?

Tough to prepare as a starting pitcher when you don't have any idea who will even be on the team you are playing tonight. 

The Marlins have announced some additions to the roster, but no subtractions yet, so there is no way of having any idea what the lineup will look like tonight.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is going to be a diminished Marlins roster for certain. 

How will everyone feel about the season if we are 9-3 after 12 games or even 8-4?  Will there start to be talk of playoffs? 

For me it's getting to the 30 game mark with a record at or better than .500. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, SteveA said:

And there have been others in rain shortened games.   The 7 inning games starting yesterday are just the first SCHEDULED 7 inning games in MLB history.   There have been hundreds of rain shortend 5, 6, 7, and 8 inning games over the years, and I'm sure some of them were complete games.

 

21 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Are those credited as CG? Was going to add the caveat of "scheduled" as you mention above, but was unsure of whether a pitcher is credited the CG in such an instance

 

21 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

It appears that they are. Looking at Gerrit Cole's reference page, he had a 5 IP CG against the Nationals this year.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/colege01.shtml

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=colege01&t=p&year=2020

 

On July 6, 1913 the Cards played the Cubs in the second game of a doubleheader.  For some reason the game was forfeited to the Cards in between the top and bottom of the 4th inning.  Slim Sallee pitched all three innings for the Cards and, strangely, was given credit for a complete game.  By modern rules no stats count in a forfeit, but perhaps they did in 1913?  Because it looks like his 3-inning complete game win is part of his official stats for '13.

There were two other cases in the early 1900s of pitchers getting complete games of less than four innings.

There have been about 50 cases of (apparently) rain-shortened games where pitchers got credit for complete games of less than five innings, since it only takes 4 1/2 to have an official game.

Edit: from the SABR forfeit log:

The second game of a doubleheader was forfeited to St. Louis by umpire Mal Eason. Both managers had agreed before the start of the game that it would end at 5 PM to allow the visiting team to catch a train to the east. Chicago manager Johnny Evers started Orval Overall, who had not started a game in over a month while nursing a bad back. Overall allowed three runs in the first inning. When Chicago came to bat in the second, they started to stall. Overall came to the plate and took a strike. Evers then summoned a player in the clubhouse as a pinch hitter, who took his time coming to the plate. When the pitcher started his wind up, the batter stepped away to wipe his eyes. The umpire called a strike. The next inning the new pitcher, Ed Ruelbach, took his time warming up. In the fourth St. Louis' Ivey Wingo laid down a bunt. The pitcher threw the ball wild to first base and Wingo headed for second. The ball came in to second but no effort was made to put the runner out. Wingo headed for third and no play was made on him again. The umpire had enough and called the game. - New York Time; 07/07/1913, p 6 (St. Louis)

No mention of why the stats counted...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

The Marlins have announced some additions to the roster, but no subtractions yet, so there is no way of having any idea what the lineup will look like tonight.

A day for Means to really dig into the Zen of just throwing the ball to the catcher's glove.

I do see Lopez at least announced as their SP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, survivedc said:

https://groundskeeper.mlblogs.com/how-do-baseball-fields-drain-so-fast-5a85a2b2fdd0
 

Found this from 2006, says fields can do 7-10 inches. Not 16 but still pretty incredible.

I seem to remember they revamped the drainage (which already was excellent) someone in the last few offseasons.    So it could be more than 7-10 now.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

 

 

On July 6, 1913 the Cards played the Cubs in the second game of a doubleheader.  For some reason the game was forfeited to the Cards in between the top and bottom of the 4th inning.  Slim Sallee pitched all three innings for the Cards and, strangely, was given credit for a complete game.  By modern rules no stats count in a forfeit, but perhaps they did in 1913?  Because it looks like his 3-inning complete game win is part of his official stats for '13.

There were two other cases in the early 1900s of pitchers getting complete games of less than four innings.

There have been about 50 cases of (apparently) rain-shortened games where pitchers got credit for complete games of less than five innings, since it only takes 4 1/2 to have an official game.

Edit: from the SABR forfeit log:

 

No mention of why the stats counted...

Orval Overall.  Man, what a great name!  I might need to form a new band just to use that as a stage name.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChuckS said:

This is going to be a diminished Marlins roster for certain. 

How will everyone feel about the season if we are 9-3 after 12 games or even 8-4?  Will there start to be talk of playoffs? 

For me it's getting to the 30 game mark with a record at or better than .500. 

I think people will start getting excited if the O's sweep the Marlins.  The sixteen-team playoff and 60-game season are such wild cards.  

In 2019, with the 16-team playoff format, the Rangers (78-84) would have made the playoffs.  That win% (.481) translates to around 28 or 29 wins in a 60-game season. 

So if the O's start the season 12-3?  They may only need to go 16-29 to finish the season and snag an 8 seed. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...