Jump to content

Importance of a Third Catcher


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

He's hitting .400 this year, so he's white-hot.  And last year he OPS'd .771.  I think that's more than enough evidence to conclude he's a late bloomer. 

If he keeps up his .400 streak he'll either be a great asset as they move deep into the playoffs, or they can flip him for a top prospect at the deadline.

I'd like a bit more of a divide between BA and OBP myself.  He just doesn't walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/15/2020 at 1:32 PM, Bahama O's Fan said:

But this is what I mean. How many games per week will one catch and one DH? How often will the catcher that day get injured? How many at bats will that affect? If he gets injured in the first inning, it's still only two or three at bats. You pinch hit in the late innings because you have the bullpen pitching. The next day, you have a catcher up. Is that worth another OF? or pitcher?

Sorry for being slow to respond. I've been busy the last week or so. Anyway, some of this has worked itself out over that time frame. You make a valid point and I guess I would say that normally I would agree with you but with the expanded rosters and the flexibility of several of the current players I would say having a third catcher is a luxury  that they can enjoy. You can make the same argument with pitchers and outfielders. It is extremely unlikely that the O's would run out of pitchers in a single day and if an extra outfielders is needed then call him up the next day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2020 at 4:55 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

There's no reason Severino or Sisco couldn't DH without a third catcher.  If something happens to the starting catcher you shift them behind the plate and you lose the DH for a few innings.  You're already switching pitchers about every inning late in the game, so just pinch hit when his spot comes up.

I agree completely that what you are suggesting is possible. It goes against the norm but, I agree. My point was that they don't have to do it that way with the current roster make up and expansion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2020 at 1:32 PM, Bahama O's Fan said:

But this is what I mean. How many games per week will one catch and one DH? How often will the catcher that day get injured? How many at bats will that affect? If he gets injured in the first inning, it's still only two or three at bats. You pinch hit in the late innings because you have the bullpen pitching. The next day, you have a catcher up. Is that worth another OF? or pitcher?

We have kind of a perfect storm situation:

   -- Due to COVID, we have a 28 man roster this year only

   -- One of our catchers is currently the #1 hitting catcher in the American League

   -- The other catcher hit well in the minors and has looked very good at the plate so far this year

   -- The guy who would be our primary DH will now see a lot of action at 1B as long as Davis is on the DL 

There are fewer good hitters at C than at most positions.   It's very rare that a team will have 2 of its top 6 or 7 hitters on the roster be catchers.   When you compound that with Nunez now playing a lot of first, we will probably want to start a C at DH with more regularity than anyone in MLB history.   And doing it in a year with some roster breathing room at 28.

So we probably have the best case for carrying three catchers of any team in the last 50 years due to this unusual confluence of circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • My mistake!  You are correct.  I had the games reversed.  Thanks for the correction.  
    • I wouldn't extend anyone just because they're a fan favorite, but rather because they're also an integral part of the core, and hard to replace. Something like Houston deciding Altuve was indispensable, but letting Correa walk. Those kind of moves both help you keep winning and demonstrate commitment to the fanbase. Gordon was 32 when he signed his extension, not exactly the same situation. 
    • Your memory is a little off.  We won the first game of that series, not the third.  Our offense was flying high at the time.  Then we lost those two games to Wainwright and Rom, and went into an offensive slump we never completely emerged from. The team lost four in a row (next two were agsinstTampa) for only the second time all year.  Starting with the Wainwright loss, the O’s only averaged 3.57 runs/game over the final 19 games of the year, after averaging 5.17 for the first 143 games.
    • Current fWAR leaderboard: # Name Team PA IP Bat WAR Pit WAR Total WAR 1 Shohei Ohtani LAD 214   3.0   3.0 2 Mookie Betts LAD 223   3.0   3.0 3 Kyle Tucker HOU 205   3.0   3.0 4 Gunnar Henderson BAL 198   2.8   2.
    • Yeah, I'm kinda under the assumption that it's gonna be a while. He looked really bad the first time and the team is performing without him. No reason to rush.
    • Well I hope Rubenstein knew that when he purchased the team.  
    • I don’t know. Heading into this season, I said I didn’t feel Gunnar’s defense at SS was so good that we should just assume Holliday doesn’t end up there.    Holliday does need to work on his arm strength and my assumption was always that he would. Now, maybe that assumption is wrong, I don’t know but at his age and time in development and the size of Gunnar, I still felt Holliday at SS and Gunnar at third would be the best total defensive lineup long term.  That doesn’t necessarily mean Holliday would be the better SS but that the combo of the 2 would be the best alignment (this also thinking Gunnar would be GG level at third but not SS) This year, I feel Gunnar has looked similar at SS although OAA likes him a lot more this year than last but stats like UZR and UZR/150 don’t. He is 36th in MLb in DRS and 6th at SS (4th in AL).  I was actually surprised to see his arm is “only” in the 77th percentile.     I can see Gunnar being a high OAA guy because I think his athleticism will simply allow him to make plays most players can’t. I think it’s fair to say that Gunnar is an above average defensive SS but how far above average is he and is he truly an elite defender at SS?  I don’t think so but maybe he can develop into one?  I feel confident he would be at third. I have said for a while that all the defensive alignment stuff will be wrapped around where Holliday and Gunnar end up. For now, it seems obvious Holliday isnt a SS option this year unless an injury occurs.    As to how that could change, I think it depends on Holliday. I still seriously doubt he ends up in CF. It’s not like he would be the first converted SS to end up out there and that’s arguably a more premium position than SS in todays game because of all the FB pitchers but it would still surprise me to see that be the long term move. I also think we are overlooking the Westburg factor here. They may believe, even with the arm not being overly strong, that he is the third baseman of the future.  Saying that, I have never doubted that Mayo could stick at third. I believe he can. I just didn’t believe it would happen here and I still don’t.   I still think he ends primarily at RF and first base.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...