Jump to content

Importance of a Third Catcher


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

On our roster, how important is it to have one compared to using that spot for another player? How many times a week is Sisco DHing? How often does a catcher get injured while the other is the DH? You can get a catcher the next day? How many ABs might this likely affect? Two? Three? Is it wise? Once you get past the middle innings you can pinch hit for the pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point, if they didn't have that third catcher they could carry three relief pitchers Hyde would never use.

I think the only reason they are running with three is that Holaday was going to opt out if they didn't promote him.  I guess they figure that having him around for emergencies is worth the roster spot with the expanded roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically teams often or usually carried third catchers years and years ago, like prior to WWII, but after rosters expanded to modern sizes around WWI.  A century ago it was much less common for catchers to play nearly every day, and 25-man rosters were novel and team didn't always utilize the whole thing effectively.  Guys like Moe Berg would be on the roster the whole year and play in parts of 30-40 games.

With modern transaction rules and catching equipment I don't think it's usually a wise use of roster space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Historically teams often or usually carried third catchers years and years ago, like prior to WWII, but after rosters expanded to modern sizes around WWI.  A century ago it was much less common for catchers to play nearly every day, and 25-man rosters were novel and team didn't always utilize the whole thing effectively.  Guys like Moe Berg would be on the roster the whole year and play in parts of 30-40 games.

With modern transaction rules and catching equipment I don't think it's usually a wise use of roster space.

You could afford to be inefficient when your pitching staff was tiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy team of the day: the 1922 Yankees.  They used eight pitchers all year. One was Clem Llewellyn, who pitched the one inning of his MLB career in June.  Another was Lefty O'Doul, who threw eight games, 16 innings. 

So almost the entire pitching load was handled by the five regular starters who averaged about 260 innings a piece, and George Murray who threw 56.2 innings mostly in relief (but had zero saves).  The team leader in saves was Sad Sam Jones, who also started 28 games and threw 260 innings.

Their top five pitchers threw 95% of their innings, and top six about 99%.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Crazy team of the day: the 1922 Yankees.  They used eight pitchers all year. One was Clem Llewellyn, who pitched the one inning of his MLB career in June.  Another was Lefty O'Doul, who threw eight games, 16 innings. 

So almost the entire pitching load was handled by the five regular starters who averaged about 260 innings a piece, and George Murray who threw 56.2 innings mostly in relief (but had zero saves).  The team leader in saves was Sad Sam Jones, who also started 28 games and threw 260 innings.

Their top five pitchers threw 95% of their innings, and top six about 99%.

Truly, they were men in those days.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From 1996 through 1999, I derided sportswriters who insisted in print that the Orioles "third Catcher" was BJ Surhoff. Clearly, Orioles management disagreed with them; behind the two primary Catchers the Orioles played Cesar Devarez, Mark Parent, Charlie Greene, Melvin Rosario and Tommy Davis behind the plate

Even BJ Surhoff disagreed with those sportswriters. Surhoff played all of ZERO innings at Catcher for Baltimore. He had no desire to catch ever again after leaving the Brewers. From the time he arrived he complained of knee pain. He was less the "third Catcher" than was Lenn Sakata. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with the current roster consisting of several guys who can play INF/OF having the 3rd catcher is a great move. It allows Hyde to DH one of Severino or Sisco when both are hot as they have been. The fact that Holaday can play a little first is a bonus. I think it leads to more lineup flexibility than less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I think with the current roster consisting of several guys who can play INF/OF having the 3rd catcher is a great move. It allows Hyde to DH one of Severino or Sisco when both are hot as they have been. The fact that Holaday can play a little first is a bonus. I think it leads to more lineup flexibility than less. 

But this is what I mean. How many games per week will one catch and one DH? How often will the catcher that day get injured? How many at bats will that affect? If he gets injured in the first inning, it's still only two or three at bats. You pinch hit in the late innings because you have the bullpen pitching. The next day, you have a catcher up. Is that worth another OF? or pitcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip said:

Truly, they were men in those days.

I think it was more their arms could handle a mid 80's fastball alot better than what pitchers are working with today. Assuming they even threw mid 80's. I also think less processed foods probably helped their tendons stay strong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

But this is what I mean. How many games per week will one catch and one DH? How often will the catcher that day get injured? How many at bats will that affect? If he gets injured in the first inning, it's still only two or three at bats. You pinch hit in the late innings because you have the bullpen pitching. The next day, you have a catcher up. Is that worth another OF? or pitcher?

I don't know what Hyde will do but if Davis gets benched ( and he should be)  then Nunez plays 1B.   That opens DH for Severino or Sisco.   The way those two are hitting I would not mind seeing them in the lineup most of the time  until they cool down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

But this is what I mean. How many games per week will one catch and one DH? How often will the catcher that day get injured? How many at bats will that affect? If he gets injured in the first inning, it's still only two or three at bats. You pinch hit in the late innings because you have the bullpen pitching. The next day, you have a catcher up. Is that worth another OF? or pitcher?

Right now, our ideal lineup includes both Sisco and Severino in the lineup with Nunez at first and Davis on the bench. 

They haven't used that lineup yet, but it is almost certainly the best option with the current roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

Right now, our ideal lineup includes both Sisco and Severino in the lineup with Nunez at first and Davis on the bench. 

They haven't used that lineup yet, but it is almost certainly the best option with the current roster.

One minute apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • My mistake!  You are correct.  I had the games reversed.  Thanks for the correction.  
    • I wouldn't extend anyone just because they're a fan favorite, but rather because they're also an integral part of the core, and hard to replace. Something like Houston deciding Altuve was indispensable, but letting Correa walk. Those kind of moves both help you keep winning and demonstrate commitment to the fanbase. Gordon was 32 when he signed his extension, not exactly the same situation. 
    • Your memory is a little off.  We won the first game of that series, not the third.  Our offense was flying high at the time.  Then we lost those two games to Wainwright and Rom, and went into an offensive slump we never completely emerged from. The team lost four in a row (next two were agsinstTampa) for only the second time all year.  Starting with the Wainwright loss, the O’s only averaged 3.57 runs/game over the final 19 games of the year, after averaging 5.17 for the first 143 games.
    • Current fWAR leaderboard: # Name Team PA IP Bat WAR Pit WAR Total WAR 1 Shohei Ohtani LAD 214   3.0   3.0 2 Mookie Betts LAD 223   3.0   3.0 3 Kyle Tucker HOU 205   3.0   3.0 4 Gunnar Henderson BAL 198   2.8   2.
    • Yeah, I'm kinda under the assumption that it's gonna be a while. He looked really bad the first time and the team is performing without him. No reason to rush.
    • Well I hope Rubenstein knew that when he purchased the team.  
    • I don’t know. Heading into this season, I said I didn’t feel Gunnar’s defense at SS was so good that we should just assume Holliday doesn’t end up there.    Holliday does need to work on his arm strength and my assumption was always that he would. Now, maybe that assumption is wrong, I don’t know but at his age and time in development and the size of Gunnar, I still felt Holliday at SS and Gunnar at third would be the best total defensive lineup long term.  That doesn’t necessarily mean Holliday would be the better SS but that the combo of the 2 would be the best alignment (this also thinking Gunnar would be GG level at third but not SS) This year, I feel Gunnar has looked similar at SS although OAA likes him a lot more this year than last but stats like UZR and UZR/150 don’t. He is 36th in MLb in DRS and 6th at SS (4th in AL).  I was actually surprised to see his arm is “only” in the 77th percentile.     I can see Gunnar being a high OAA guy because I think his athleticism will simply allow him to make plays most players can’t. I think it’s fair to say that Gunnar is an above average defensive SS but how far above average is he and is he truly an elite defender at SS?  I don’t think so but maybe he can develop into one?  I feel confident he would be at third. I have said for a while that all the defensive alignment stuff will be wrapped around where Holliday and Gunnar end up. For now, it seems obvious Holliday isnt a SS option this year unless an injury occurs.    As to how that could change, I think it depends on Holliday. I still seriously doubt he ends up in CF. It’s not like he would be the first converted SS to end up out there and that’s arguably a more premium position than SS in todays game because of all the FB pitchers but it would still surprise me to see that be the long term move. I also think we are overlooking the Westburg factor here. They may believe, even with the arm not being overly strong, that he is the third baseman of the future.  Saying that, I have never doubted that Mayo could stick at third. I believe he can. I just didn’t believe it would happen here and I still don’t.   I still think he ends primarily at RF and first base.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...