Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

And somehow has only been worth 0.2 WAR so far.  Part of it is he's cooled off since his hot start (not surprising), but the other is his D-WAR is -0.6.  I know D-War is a really shaky statistic, but that's pretty bad, especially since he was -2.3 last year.

The other advanced defensive metrics all rate him negatively so far.    Still, I’d guess Arizona is pretty happy with his production.   fWAR has him at 0.7, compared to rWAR’s 0.2.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

Brad Brach has, for the most part, continued his nice rebound that he had with the Braves after departing last summer.  2.20 ERA in 16.1 IP and has already been worth 0.5 WAR, in spite of a really bad WHIP and K-BB walk rate.  To his credit the walks have gotten a little better since the beginning of the season, and despite all of that he hasn't given up a run since April 19.

That's by bb-ref's rWAR, which basically gives the pitcher credit for how many runs are allowed on his watch without regard to underlying numbers.  By fWAR he's sitting at 0.1, because fWAR puts very heavy weight on the underlying K, BB, HR rates, and Brach is walking a batter an inning.

He has a 2.20 ERA, a 3.85 FIP and a 5.10 xFIP.  Unless he gets his control fixed his rWAR will make a beeline for his fWAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The other advanced defensive metrics all rate him negatively so far.    Still, I’d guess Arizona is pretty happy with his production.   fWAR has him at 0.7, compared to rWAR’s 0.2.    

.225/.312/.708 over his last 30 games

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's by bb-ref's rWAR, which basically gives the pitcher credit for how many runs are allowed on his watch without regard to underlying numbers.  By fWAR he's sitting at 0.1, because fWAR puts very heavy weight on the underlying K, BB, HR rates, and Brach is walking a batter an inning.

He has a 2.20 ERA, a 3.85 FIP and a 5.10 xFIP.  Unless he gets his control fixed his rWAR will make a beeline for his fWAR.

His FIP is in-line with his career numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, webbrick2010 said:

.225/.312/.708 over his last 30 games

 

He’s always been a streaky guy.    Yet, his final slash line over 162 games tends to be pretty consistent.   The question going into the season is whether his power numbers, which dropped a lot last year, would recover.   So far so good in that department, though I expect that to drop off some from its current level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, atomic said:

His FIP is in-line with his career numbers. 

But the underlying numbers are different.  He's walking batters at more than twice his career rate.  And he hasn't allowed a homer yet.  He'll probably allow a homer or five, and we'll have to wait to see what's up with his control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He’s always been a streaky guy.   

Isn't everyone?

Steady Eddie Murray had the following consecutive-month OPS pairs during these years with the Orioles:

1977: .630/1.044
1978: .669/1.069
1979: .731/1.074
1980: 1.142/.827
1982: .733/.918
1983: 1.301/.652
1984: 1.161/.752

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Isn't everyone?

Steady Eddie Murray had the following consecutive-month OPS pairs during these years with the Orioles:

1977: .630/1.044
1978: .669/1.069
1979: .731/1.074
1980: 1.142/.827
1982: .733/.918
1983: 1.301/.652
1984: 1.161/.752

The answer is yes, everyone is pretty streaky.   I’d say Adam is above average in streakiness, though it’s hard to come up with a good way to measure that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The answer is yes, everyone is pretty streaky.   I’d say Adam is above average in streakiness, though it’s hard to come up with a good way to measure that.   

There are many good ways to estimate and compare variation (coefficient of variation for example), but it gets weird when you compare two individuals. You can compare the CV’s of all qualifying players to Adam’s with a t-test designed to compare one sample to a mean. I think that would be appropriate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • That's way too many major league players for us to give up. We still need to field a major league team this year.
    • I think definitely Burnes and Kimbrel. I could see Grayson either way. I would understand the argument that he’s not deserving but then again he’s got 10 wins (which I’m sure managers still put emphasis on). 
    • No way Seattle gives up on Kirby for anything shy of someone like Gunnar or adley. He’s an all star caliber starter with multiple years of cheap control. This offer wouldn’t even come close. Especially since they are a playoff caliber team trying to improve now and not build for the future. 
    • Moving Urias so Mayo could play two days a week isn't the best choice for his overall progress. I'd rather he stay in Norfolk until he can play five days a week. I like seeing him putting up numbers there, knowing he is a regular for us next year or maybe after the trade deadline.
    • Civale had a sub 4 era in 2022 and 2023, with a similar fip to suggest it wasn’t just luck. If you think that’s who he is rather than this 2024 version, then a lottery ticket international player in a ball seems like a worth while price to see if you can get him back to prior year form. Sure, bencosme or however you spell it would be fine too, but for a guy who has a legitimate chance to help us down the stretch for a guy who may have a 30% chance of ever making the majors?   Right now we’re relying on Irvin to rebound, Suarez to hold up, and kremer to be the back end of our rotation. Not sure how cobble is somehow a downgrade on them giving us important innings. Again, for the price, that’s an upside trade I’d make all day. 
    • Considering what we saw of them offensively, who says no first? O's get Kirby and a low level prospect Seattle gets Mountcastle, Kjerstad, McDermott, Norby, Urias, Hays, and some Cash to offset cost of Hays/Urias? Not sure Mariners bite w/o a Westburg or Cowser in the deal, but I feel they need MLB ready offense. Hoping Hays or Urias can return to form with steady playing time, but if not, the cash offsets it if they want to cut them later. I'm excited to watch their other arms this series too. If Kirby is their highest regarded arm, then they probably won't move him, but if one of their other arms looks appealing, I think Elias may try to swing a deal while he's in town.  I feel the O's and Mariners match up well  
    • 1. I’m not so sure it is a sell high move. O’Hearn’s statcast numbers are great. He takes good at bats and hits the ball hard. Nothing about his improvement has been fluky.  2. I’m not denying a trade could be beneficial. I’m just saying if the choice for playing time right now is between Kjerstad and Mayo, I’ll take Mayo because I think the Orioles are better with: Mayo taking Urias/Mateo at bats than Kjerstad taking O’Hearn/Santander/Cowser/Mullins/Hays at bats. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...