Jump to content

Projected Orioles 2021 Opening Day Payroll (ODP)


AZRon

Recommended Posts

On November 16, 2018, Mike Elias was hired by the Baltimore Orioles as Executive Vice-President and General Manager.

After allowing for the previous administration's 2018 player trades and the ensuing player declarations of free agency, Elias inherited a minimum 2019 opening day player payroll (ODP) of about $61 million(M). The O's ODP in 2018 had been $154.5M.

Elias's ODP for 2019 was, in fact, just over $82M. Adjusted for a 162 game season, his ODP for 2020 was just under $63M.

For those who want to play GM, I am presenting my current projected ODP for the start of the 2021 season. The O's will have pay obligations for all players on the 40 man roster, but I'm dealing only with the "active" roster (I'm assuming a 26 player limit).

To be on this list, the player must be under contract or under team control.

The players listed on the chart linked below are my current guesses based on the above requirement and transactions to date. I'll update the chart as the off-season proceeds and/or my magic 8-ball results change (all help appreciated).

Salaries are displayed as rounded to the nearest $10k, but the total is accurate to 2 decimal places.

Projections for those under contract are from authoritative media sources or the Cots Baseball Prospectus Compensation Website - https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-east/baltimore-orioles/

The 2021 MLB minimum salary is $570,500. 

I provide this information so that we can make accurate and useful comparisons to the opening day payrolls of the Orioles in previous years, other MLB teams and the totals for Major League Baseball. As with virtually all team opening day payroll tabulations on the web, my total payroll figure does not reflect any deductions for deferred salaries or additions for set-asides for deferrals from previous years (as required by Article XVI of the CBA). So, please, let's dispense with the squabbling over the "accounting" for salary deferrals. I have noted the 2021 contract deferrals in the right-most column of the below chart.

The chart is available on Google docs at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r9rXsnRddT87SU72o4a0Jn6q_fIDbi3Dxlu_9OZiqCo/edit?usp=sharing

 

Edited by AZRon
1/26/2021 - Added Freddy Galvis; 2/3/2021 - Deleted Alex Cobb; 2/5/2021 - Arbitration ruling Santander; 3/17/2021 Signing of Maikel Franco & projected IL
  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cobb's 2020 salary is no correct.   I think if I am reading it right he paid 5m and 10m is deferred.

From Cots Contracts:

  • $20M is deferred ($6.5M of 2018 salary and $4.5M annually of 2019-21 salaries), to be paid $2M on 11/30/22 and $1.8M annually each 11/30, 2023-32)
  • if Cobb does not pitch 130 innings in 2020, an additional $5.5M of 2021 salary is deferred, to be paid $1.75M annually each 11/30, 2033-35

https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-east/baltimore-orioles/

Please  correct me if I am wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wildcard:

Here's what I see for Alex Cobb on the COTS website:

4 years/$57M (2018-21)
signed by Baltimore as a free agent 3/21/18
18:$14M, 19:$14M 20:$14M, 21:$15M
annual performance bonus: $0.5M for 180 innings pitched
$20M is deferred ($6.5M of 2018 salary and $4.5M annually of 2019-21 salaries), to be paid $2M on 11/30/22 and $1.8M annually each 11/30, 2023-32)
if Cobb does not pitch 130 innings in 2020, an additional $5.5M of 2021 salary is deferred, to be paid $1.75M annually each 11/30, 2033-35

Cobb pitched the 162 game equivalent of 140 2/3 innings in 2020, so, I assume that the last deferral possibility does not apply.

Therefore, for 2021 his salary is $15M with $4,5M deferred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AZRon said:

Wildcard:

Here's what I see for Alex Cobb on the COTS website:

4 years/$57M (2018-21)
signed by Baltimore as a free agent 3/21/18
18:$14M, 19:$14M 20:$14M, 21:$15M
annual performance bonus: $0.5M for 180 innings pitched
$20M is deferred ($6.5M of 2018 salary and $4.5M annually of 2019-21 salaries), to be paid $2M on 11/30/22 and $1.8M annually each 11/30, 2023-32)
if Cobb does not pitch 130 innings in 2020, an additional $5.5M of 2021 salary is deferred, to be paid $1.75M annually each 11/30, 2033-35

Cobb pitched the 162 game equivalent of 140 2/3 innings in 2020, so, I assume that the last deferral possibility does not apply.

Therefore, for 2021 his salary is $15M with $4,5M deferred.

OK, but we don't know if the equivalent  is really the measure being used.  In reality he did not pitch 130 innings n 2020.  Its your chart so I am good either way.  Nice work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mature Machado terms crested from 2016-2018 at ballpark $150M/year.

With the broadest brush possible, if we figure "all the Orioles best players" have their club control seasons in 2021/2022/2023 (if they earn it next summer, I feel both Rodriguez and Hall should get cups of coffee--if not more--to inform their '21-'22 offseason), and arb 2024-2027, those early Rutschman teams of '22 onwards could have their Tejada character and still be very affordable in an MLB-average context.

The core talent should make an obvious contender by 2023 when the Davis thing at last goes away, and hopefully 2022 won't get sandbagged with that built-in excuse.   Especially if Means and Santander continue playing their way toward building block status, that Winning Switch setting ought to be on its last 10 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

OK, but we don't know if the equivalent  is really the measure being used.  In reality he did not pitch 130 innings n 2020.  Its your chart so I am good either way.  Nice work.

Wildcard:

I think it's fair to "assume" that, if the contract terms for annual salary were adjusted proportionately for the shortened season, then, all other contract terms were adjusted in the same manner (with the possible exception of the deferred accrual for 2020).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, AZRon said:

 

Wildcard:

I think it's fair to "assume" that, if the contract terms for annual salary were adjusted proportionately for the shortened season, then, all other contract terms were adjusted in the same manner (with the possible exception of the deferred accrual for 2020).

I agree, AZ.  I have posted multiple times this off-season that Cobb's $ is unlikely to be deferred because he likely will be considered to have met the threshold.  IMO, the Os are better off this way - paying Cobb in full this year and not having his contract impact future years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great exercise, AZRon.

Elias continues to be hamstrung by the Davis and Cobb contracts - master of the obvious.  These older, veteran contracts not only prevent the payroll from being lower, but prevent Elias from making multiple investments in $3M-$6M free agents that might be worthwhile investments into our next competitive team or to flip for prospects.  $38M in 2021 that generated 0 WAR in 2020 and negative WAR in 2019.  In the third year of a re-build, that is a lot of wasted $.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

This is a great exercise, AZRon.

Elias continues to be hamstrung by the Davis and Cobb contracts - master of the obvious.  These older, veteran contracts not only prevent the payroll from being lower, but prevent Elias from making multiple investments in $3M-$6M free agents that might be worthwhile investments into our next competitive team or to flip for prospects.  $38M in 2021 that generated 0 WAR in 2020 and negative WAR in 2019.  In the third year of a re-build, that is a lot of wasted $.

He’s not hamstrung by those contracts.  He is hamstrung by ownership.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s not hamstrung by those contracts.  He is hamstrung by ownership.  

If you were worth replying to, I would have posted many more times in the past week. 

You can post your opinion as many times as you want on the same subject.  It doesn't make your opinion right.

Anyone with the baseball interest you have should know the difference in rating (and risk) between 17 and 18 year old high schoolers taken in the draft and pending 16 year old international signings (who were scouted and agreed to deals as 14 and 15 year olds) - as a for instance.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

If you were worth replying to, I would have posted many more times in the past week. 

You can post your opinion as many times as you want on the same subject.  It doesn't make your opinion right.

Anyone with the baseball interest you have should know the difference in rating (and risk) between 17 and 18 year old high schoolers taken in the draft and pending 16 year old international signings (who were scouted and agreed to deals as 14 and 15 year olds) - as a for instance.

Somewhere in there, I suppose I’m supposed to be insulted but your ramblings don’t really do that for me.(I don’t even know what the last paragraph is supposed to mean)

And you are sorely mistaken if you think those players are hamstringing Elias.  The Orioles can clearly and obviously spend more money than 60M.  So, if you want to say within the framework of only having a 60M payroll sure Elias is hamstrung by them.  However, the 60M payroll threshold is obviously set by ownership and that is truly what Elias is hamstrung by.

Also, Cobb is a productive player when he is healthy.  He may not be worth 10-13M but has not far off from that.  When a player is producing for you and the salary isn’t that exorbitant, he’s not really hamstringing you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AZRon said:

 

Wildcard:

I think it's fair to "assume" that, if the contract terms for annual salary were adjusted proportionately for the shortened season, then, all other contract terms were adjusted in the same manner (with the possible exception of the deferred accrual for 2020).

I will not argue the point because I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eddie Cicotte : You said if I won 30 games this year there'd be a $10,000 bonus.

Charles Comiskey : So?

Eddie Cicotte : I think you owe it to me.

Charles Comiskey : Harry, how many games did Mr. Cicotte win for us this year?

Harry : 29, sir.

Eddie Cicotte : You had Kid bench me for two whole weeks in August. I missed five starts.

Charles Comiskey : We had to rest your arm for the series.

Eddie Cicotte : I would have won at least two of those games. You knew that.

Charles Comiskey : I have to keep the best interests of the club in mind, Eddie.

Eddie Cicotte : I think you owe me that bonus.

Charles Comiskey : 29 is not 30, Eddie. You will get only the money you deserve.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
    • To be honest i wont know.  I know im in the absolute minority here but when the robo umps show up, im outa here.  Im barely hanging on now due to the recent rule changes the last few years.  Baseball and football has changed so much lately ive really lost interest.  I actually just cancelled Fubo just so i can save some money.    
    • That's a good point as an OF I read swings but it's different on dirt.  I could freeze knowing my speed would make up for a poor read-no time to do that on dirt.  There was more time to think in the OF which was good and bad. To your second point- I didn't think about it until now but in my coaching experience some kids-the really good OF's were just flat out better at tracking balls than others-combination of eyesight and instincts-not sure but you brought up a good point.   JH would likely be an plus CF given what we know about him but it will take reps otherwise you're giving up outs and advances.  FWIW-Slotting JH into CF would run somewhat counter intuitive to drafting EBJ and Josenberger (who really only provide value in CF) in the last draft.  
    • I understand but again a contending team is not going to trade a good pitcher for someone who can leave the team end of year. 
    • First of all, pretty much everyone that wears an MLB uniform is a good enough athlete to play just about any sport to at least a d3 collegiate level, and likely d1, Holliday included.  The only exceptions would be people that have hard size limitations.  (e.g. Corbin Carroll or Jose Altuve are unlikely to be football players simply due to their size.  And Altuve isn't going to cut it in basketball for the same reason.)  But for sports like skateboarding or any swing sports like tennis or golf?  I guarantee JH could be a high level college athlete if not a pro player if he focused on them.  If you're arguing that Gunnar has athleticism/body control that's elite even among MLB standards, and Holliday doesn't.... maybe I'd agree with you?  But Gunnar is always going to have his arm tool over Holliday.  In my limited time viewing Holliday, I'd actually rate Holliday's body control to be better than Gunnar's, but a large part of that is because Gunnar is 6'4" 220, and Holliday is 6' 190.  I'd also say that Gunnar having the body control and athleticism he has given his size is pretty exceptional, so if you want to bring up his combination of size and athleticism/body control, I'd agree with you.   But you're coming off like Uncle Rico in Napoleon Dynamite, while implying that someone who's like 89th percentile sprint speed isn't an elite athlete even among other MLB players, and that is just outlandish to me.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...