Jump to content

Five player comps for Anthony Santander's arbitration case


Frobby

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think having the DH in the NL is going to move his value by an appreciable amount.

I disagree. Not as much as it'll move a guy like Mancini, but 1) Santander could be a DH and 2) Santander can play a good outfield and move some stiff player to DH. 

Those NL teams will be looking for good bats. Santander fits that mold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is interesting: I just read that JD Davis and the Mets exchanged the exact same salary figures as Santander and the O’s.  

Davis (career): .268/.346/.448, 33 HR, 88 RBI in 863 PA, 0.4 rWAR, 2.3 fWAR

Santander (career): .252/.292/.467, 32 HR, 99 RBI in 709 PA, 2.5 rWAR, 1.4 fWAR

Davis (2020): .247/.371/.389, 6 HR 19 RBI in 229 PA, 0.1 rWAR, 0.5 fWAR

Santander (2020): .261/.315/.575, 11 HR, 32 RBI in 165 PA, 1.8 rWAR, 0.9 fWAR    

If one wins and one loses, it could tell you a lot about how the arbitrators value defensive metrics and how they weight career numbers vs. the most recent season.   By all accounts, Davis is a pretty poor fielder whether at 3B or in LF.   Offensively, he’s arguably got a bit of an edge on Santander career-wise, but Santander was the better player in 2020 despite playing fewer games.   

Should be noted that it’s a completely different panel of arbitrators hearing the two cases.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2021 at 6:09 PM, Sports Guy said:

It depends on what else he brings to the table.  Average-ish defense, low OBP, mediocre speed and good but not great power isn’t a tough combo to find.

Contgratuations, you are the biggest Debbie Downer on the board of the worst team in baseball.....it's painful to read your comments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2021 at 6:09 PM, Sports Guy said:

It depends on what else he brings to the table.  Average-ish defense, low OBP, mediocre speed and good but not great power isn’t a tough combo to find.

Will admit I often find myself at odds with much of what you post, but this one is right on the money. If Santander was on another team, most of this forum would balk at offering anything of value for him in trade (or even pursuing at all). He is a Rule V success story and has offered some nice power production at a low cost - but he is not the type of player we should be keeping around at a higher cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connja said:

Contgratuations, you are the biggest Debbie Downer on the board of the worst team in baseball.....it's painful to read your comments.  

You hating reading the truth?  Should I be blowing sunshine up your butt?

He has to be better than what he is.  What he is, is what I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if he slugs just enough to not get to use Ryan Howard ever as a comp on the high side, and not to get non-tendered on the low side....

Maybe this is the difference between 4/32 and 4/38 before FA, rounding off to Arb1 baseline of $2M not $2.5M and guessing "about double" as what you get year to year if you stay about as good as you currently are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

In news that doesn't mean much, the Orioles won the Santander arbitration.  Heyman tweeted that this might make him more attractive to the Marlins.  Hopefully, this further cements the Orioles desire to not trade Santander as a "salary dump."

I’m mildly surprised, but good for the O’s, I guess.  JD Davis also lost his case with the Mets, at the exact same figures.    Owners are 2-0 so far, with 11 other arbitrations scheduled.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with that and he's only two years out of high school. If Holliday gets back to his pre-call up stat line as you mentioned then he deserves serious consideration to be back on the Orioles roster. For now Mayo and Norby are deserving of being called up if the Orioles want to bring up a player from Norfolk.
    • I just want to riff on the term “elite athlete.”   To me, different people have different ideas of what level of quality is “elite,” and what it means to be an “athlete.”    For some people, “elite” means top 10% of the whole populace, for others it means top 0.1% of people who play professional sports.   Some people consider you “athletic” if you are very well coordinated and have good ability to learn skills, others don’t consider you “athletic” unless you could hold your own in the Olympic decathlon.   So a lot of times, people arguing about whether someone is an “elite athlete” are really talking past each other because they don’t ageee on what the term means.   To me, most pro sports players are elite athletes, and it’s just a matter of how elite they are.   In the case of Holliday, he’s athletic enough to be an awesome baseball player, and that’s elite enough for me.    
    • Locked on Orioles podcast reviews 6 rental relievers (contract for only this year) who the O's could trade for. 6.  John Brebbia, White Sox 5.  Adam Ottavino, Mets 4.  Carlos Estevez, Angels 3.  Paul Sewald, D Backs 2.  Yimi Garcia, Blue Jays 1.  David Robertson, Rangers Listed in the order they appear in the video, which is also the host's view of their value--increasing to Robertson at the top.
    • https://www.fangraphs.com/players/dean-kremer/19350/splits-tool?position=P&splitArr=&splitArrPitch=&autoPt=false&splitTeams=false&statType=player&statgroup=1&startDate=2002-01-01&endDate=2024-11-01&players=&filter=&groupBy=month&wxTemperature=&wxPressure=&wxAirDensity=&wxElevation=&wxWindSpeed=&sort=-1%2C1 Bah, the link doesn't seem to be working. Go to splits, select by month and then go to advanced. 2024: Mar/Apr:  5.25 May:  4.05 July:  1.16
    • Want to sweep this series. But 2/3 isn't the end of the world.
    • Right. It’s a screwup on their part. 
    • The last column is IRS, which means “inherited runners scored”  Inherited runners would be IR and I am surprised that I didn’t see it anywhere in that column. This particular site has a different set of initials, IRS means inherited runners scored. I don’t think that can possibly be correct, because that would be a huge number.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...