Jump to content

The Catching Situation


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Honda is also ranked as the number 1 stolen car maker because of how easy they are to steal. (1)

Catcher takes such an abusive at the position, that they better be a durable dude. (2)

 

(1) This makes no sense. People do not buy cars because they are easy to steal.

(2) Hondas are durable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Harvey was a first round draft pitcher with strong family pedigree, so his improvement is based on Sisco's catching him?  Sorry, I dont really go along with that, but hey, you are welcome to that. Not exactly like you said the world was flat.

I will strongly disagree with you about C defense being over rated.

I dont agree, call me old school, call me an idiot, I dont care. Give me a  plus defender at Catcher that can handle the pitchers, set up the correct location for the pitch called for, being the field general out there. making sure his COF isnt in the wrong position. 

 

1). Harvey has had some major injuries and has converted to a reliever.  And just because he is a first rounder, doesn’t mean he’s going to develop.

2) I agree that I would prefer plus defense. I want plus defense at every position.  I just think people overrate the defense of a C and it’s impact on the staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, survivedc said:

I think we’ve all seen Severino’s casual attempts to block balls in the dirt to know that good C defense isn’t overrated. 
 

I am interested to see if any of the initiatives to increase steals in the minors make it up to the bigs, will make catcher’s arms important in a hurry.

Mistakes are always an issue no matter the position.  That’s obvious.

I don’t know how much watching him poorly block balls in the dirt means that C defense isn’t overrated.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t know how much watching him poorly block balls in the dirt means that C defense isn’t overrated.

How on earth is catcher defense overrated? It's the most important/demanding defensive position in baseball. There really isn't a close second. Perhaps if they eventually adopt an electronic strikezone you could make that argument, but even still it would be the most important defensive position. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LTO's said:

How on earth is catcher defense overrated? It's the most important/demanding defensive position in baseball. There really isn't a close second. Perhaps if they eventually adopt an electronic strikezone you could make that argument, but even still it would be the most important defensive position. 

You’re better off talking to a brick wall.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LTO's said:

How on earth is catcher defense overrated? It's the most important/demanding defensive position in baseball. There really isn't a close second. Perhaps if they eventually adopt an electronic strikezone you could make that argument, but even still it would be the most important defensive position. 

I can think the Beatles were the best band in the world and still think they are overrated.

Saying you think catcher defense is overrated is not the same thing as saying catcher defense is unimportant.

 

I've said it before.  If framing made as big a difference as certain groups thinks it does, teams would pay for it.  They have the data, most of them aren't stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LTO's said:

How on earth is catcher defense overrated? It's the most important/demanding defensive position in baseball. There really isn't a close second. Perhaps if they eventually adopt an electronic strikezone you could make that argument, but even still it would be the most important defensive position. 

I think there's differences to "catcher defense" concept:

1. The older school concept, which is related to throwing, blocking balls in the dirt, positioning his teammates correctly, calling pitches

2. The newer school, which is related to pitch framing, getting additional strikes and therefore additional outs, adding to team win percentage, etc.

 

Not saying either Sisco or Severino is good at it, but the first guy doesn't count as much for WAR as the second guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I can think the Beatles were the best band in the world and still think they are overrated.

Saying you think catcher defense is overrated is not the same thing as saying catcher defense is unimportant.

 

I've said it before.  If framing made as big a difference as certain groups thinks it does, teams would pay for it.  They have the data, most of them aren't stupid. 

Surely you realize that framing is a fraction of what makes catcher defense important, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MarCakes21 said:

I think there's differences to "catcher defense" concept:

1. The older school concept, which is related to throwing, blocking balls in the dirt, positioning his teammates correctly, calling pitches

2. The newer school, which is related to pitch framing, getting additional strikes and therefore additional outs, adding to team win percentage, etc.

 

Not saying either Sisco or Severino is good at it, but the first guy doesn't count as much for WAR as the second guy

In today's game pitch calling and positioning shouldn't be handled by the catcher.  The analytics department should have all of that mapped out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

In today's game pitch calling and positioning shouldn't be handled by the catcher.  The analytics department should have all of that mapped out.

Which is done in turn by the catcher or someone in the dugout and the catcher relays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I wanted him in the offseason. 
    • Yeah, I don't get it. I mean, Urias can play 2B. Leave Westburg at 3B like they did with Gunnar at SS and let Mateo and Urias split 2B duties for now.
    • He doesn't have to. But yea, whomever is running him out there is going to decide to.
    • The Red Sox got picks 132 and 133 for Eovaldi and Bogaerts.
    • I have attached a link to the latest SABR Defensive Index (SDI) player rankings, updated yesterday for games through June 7. (Although I'm pretty sure I've posted one or more of these in the past, I couldn't find a previous thread on SDIs. It doesn't quite fit under Gold Glove awards or discussions. But then again, I often can't kind my phone, my keys and/or my wallet, so there may be an extant thread that is eluding me.) https://sabr.org/sdi The SDI is a compliation of defensive statatics: "A composite measure of fielding based on five fielding metrics and computed by a committee working under the auspices of the Society for American Baseball Research. Four of the metrics comprising it are zone rating statistic; Chris Dial's Runs Effectively Defended, John Dewan's Defensive Runs Saved, Sean Smith's Total Zone Rating, and Mitchel Lichtman's Ultimate Zone Rating. The fifth metric, Michael Humphrey's Defensive Regression Analysis, is based on conventional fielding indices but uses statistical procedures to rid them of bias. The Index constitutes 25 percent of the method used to determine Gold Glove Award winners."  I belive zero is supposed to be league average. The Oriole highlight of the update is that Gunnar Henderson is first among MLB shortstops, is tied for fourth among all AL fielders (Texas' Marcus Semien is way ahead of the rest of the field), and is tied for seventh among all MLB fielders.  Here arevthe rankings for the Orioles among qualifying AL fielders, with comparisons to qualifiers on the team we're chasing right now. Some of the rankings seem quite odd to me, but in a rare moment of conciseness I'm refraining from comment. Pitcher -  Burnes is 21st, with a negative SDI. Three NY starters (Cortes, Stroman and Gil) are ranked higher than that.  Catcher - Rutschman is eighth. The NYYs' Jose Trevino and Austin Wells are third and tied for ninth. 1B - Mountcastle is fourth (highest among AL East 1Bmen). The NYYs' Anthony Rizzo is sixth. 2B - No Oriole qualifier. The NYYs' Gleyber Torres is seventh of nine qualifiers, with a negative SDI. SS - Training Gunnar in spots 2-4 are Volpe, then Seager and Witt in a tie. 3B - Westburg is fifth, one spot behind the NYYs' Oswaldo Cabrera.  LF - Cowser is third, well behind Verdugo in first. CF - Mullins is tenth (with a negative SDI). Judge is tied for fourth. RF - Santana is tenth (with a negative SDI). Soto is tied for second.   
    • I understand, but Crochet is going to run into an innings limit later this season.  He would then have to go to the pen this season.   We do need help, no doubt about it.  It will be very interesting to see how Elias handles who he targets and what he's willing to deal away.
    • That is true, and a lot of the “badness” has been Westy him himself. I think he’s a very fine player, and I don’t want to sound disparaging, but I would much prefer that he be at third all the time.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...