Jump to content

Left field at OPACY going through a big change


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

This essentially puts the left fielder on an island.  The centerfielder will not be able to run over, turn right at the corner all while trying to track a fly ball.

It will also make life difficult for the umpires.  The unnatural corner in the middle of the field will make it difficult to get a proper angle to determine if a catch was, or wasn't, made.  The sight lines from the infield will be changed dramatically.  I hope they set up cameras to pick up the nuances of these changes to help on reviews.  What's the view like from the two dugouts?  Does one manager have an advantage with a better angle than the other to ask for a review?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yossarian said:

This essentially puts the left fielder on an island.  The centerfielder will not be able to run over, turn right at the corner all while trying to track a fly ball.

It will also make life difficult for the umpires.  The unnatural corner in the middle of the field will make it difficult to get a proper angle to determine if a catch was, or wasn't, made.  The sight lines from the infield will be changed dramatically.  I hope they set up cameras to pick up the nuances of these changes to help on reviews.  What's the view like from the two dugouts?  Does one manager have an advantage with a better angle than the other to ask for a review?

Even the fan sight lines will miss a spot from many places in the ballpark.   That often happens in the corners, but it is pretty rare to have a spot in the middle of the outfield that isn't visible from every single infield/baseline seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Even the fan sight lines will miss a spot from many places in the ballpark.   That often happens in the corners, but it is pretty rare to have a spot in the middle of the outfield that isn't visible from every single infield/baseline seat.

I suspect that the fan experience was very low on the list of considerations when they came up with this dumb idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't decided.  The park is the most brilliant addition to the game in my lifetime.  I have loved it in spite of the horrible management of the team.  But the game has changed alot and this move could help.  But I will have to see some games to really accept it.  Drungo above makes the simple point that its a different look so it's dumb.  I get that.  Let's see how it plays.  

I would say the change makes OF like Mountcastle, or Stewart unplayable.  Right?  Right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Positives to this change: Makes baseball at OPACY more of an athletic competition with fielders given space to run, and hitters not being able to sit back and wait for cheap homers as much.  If teams across MLB were to do things like this it could force the game to adopt more contact and speed oriented strategies and rosters, rather than wall-to-wall Chris Davis clones.  Ballparks have long been designed to the specs of the 1920s, and players are much larger and more athletic, parks should be scaled appropriately.

Negatives: It's not how Camden Yards looked in 1992, so it's dumb and stupid and I want them to put it back.

Exactly right.  The people pushing back on this are so absurd and btw, many of those people probably hate the 3 outcome sport it has become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that they did it because I do want athleticism to matter, but I sure wish they moved the lower bullpen into CF. Plenty of space to do so.

The corner is stupid, and not just because it's different. It's basically a gimmick. At least there's not a pillar or a hill right in the field of play, but it's still bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Positives to this change: Makes baseball at OPACY more of an athletic competition with fielders given space to run, and hitters not being able to sit back and wait for cheap homers as much.  If teams across MLB were to do things like this it could force the game to adopt more contact and speed oriented strategies and rosters, rather than wall-to-wall Chris Davis clones.  Ballparks have long been designed to the specs of the 1920s, and players are much larger and more athletic, parks should be scaled appropriately.

Negatives: It's not how Camden Yards looked in 1992, so it's dumb and stupid and I want them to put it back.

I kinda like it. Hopefully nobody wipes out on the angle. Camden Yards is still one of the best baseball stadiums around in my opinion.

 

I suspect that the home team will adjust rather quickly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...