Jump to content

What’s your 2022 OPS projection for Rougned Odor?


Frobby

What’s your 2022 OPS projection for Rougned Odor?  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your 2022 OPS Projection for Rougned Odor?

    • .780 or higher
    • .750 - .779
      0
    • .720 - .749
    • .690 - .719
    • .660 - .689
    • Under .660

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 02/28/22 at 22:20

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its a matter of if the O's have someone better.   Right now they don't.   He is their backup infielder. 

I look at Odor as buying time to see what we actually do have developing.  I'll be rooting for the Odor for sure, but also for the guys behind him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure they do.  Finding someone better is easy.

We’ll see if they add another infielder or two before the season begins.   As things stand right now, I think it’s likely that Odor makes the team.   The competition is not very stiff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure they do.  Finding someone better is easy.

OK, who would be better that you thing the O's could get on a one year contract.    Gunnar, Westburg and Ortiz may arrive next spring so the O's don't want block them.   So it would probably be a one year contract  or a AAA contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, wildcard said:

OK, who would be better that you thing the O's could get on a one year contract.    Gunnar, Westburg and Ortiz may arrive next spring so the O's don't want block them.   So it would probably be a one year contract  or a AAA contract.

Odor has been worth a TOTAL of .7 WAR the last 3 seasons. I do not need to go through the litany of players that improve on that.

And if you can obtain real talent on a multi year deal, you do it and let things play out after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Odor has been worth a TOTAL of .7 WAR the last 3 seasons. I do not need to go through the litany of players that improve on that.

And if you can obtain real talent on a multi year deal, you do it and let things play out after that.

I didn't ask for a litany.  I asked for one.

Elias did not go through 3 years of last place teams and development of the farm system to block his best prospects now.  Its not reasonable to think he would do that by signing a FA infielder to a long term contract.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

I didn't ask for a litany.  I asked for one.

Elias did not go through 3 years of last place teams and development of the farm system to block his best prospects now.  Its not reasonable to think he would do that by signing a FA infielder to a long term contract.

Gosh, isn't it terrible how, if Elias signs a guy for more than one year how he is irrevocably bound to play that player for the full extent of the contract.

I know other teams are allowed to trade, bench or even release players but that avenue isn't open to Elias.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wildcard said:

OK, who would be better that you thing the O's could get on a one year contract.    Gunnar, Westburg and Ortiz may arrive next spring so the O's don't want block them.   So it would probably be a one year contract  or a AAA contract.

Henderson - 17 PA in AA

Westburg - 130 PA in AA

Ortiz - 67 PA in AA

I don’t think you plan for 2023 expecting any of those guys to be on your 2023 OD roster.  They’ve all got a lot more development to do.   I heard Kevin Goldstein say on a podcast that he expected the O’s to leave Henderson in AA most or all of the year after being aggressive with him last year.   

If one or more of them excels to the point where they are ready in early 2023, you can worry about it then.  I certainly wouldn’t hesitate to sign a solid infielder through 2023.

 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Henderson - 17 PA in AA

Westburg - 130 PA in AA

Ortiz - 67 PA in AA

I don’t think you plan for 2023 expecting any of those guys to be on your 2023 OD roster.  They’ve all got a lot more development to do.   I heard Kevin Goldstein say on a podcast that he expected the O’s to leave Henderson in AA most or all of the year after being aggressive with him last year.   

If one or more of them excels to the point where they are ready in early 2023, you can worry about it then.  I certainly wouldn’t hesitate to sign a solid infielder through 2023.

 
 

I don't agree.   Its all about Westburg, Ortiz, Vavra and Gunnar's performance on how they move up.  Westburg had a good Sept in AA.   He could be promoted to AAA a month or two into the season if he starts fast.   Vavra had a good 184 PA at AA.  These guys are not far from the majors.

The O's have six infielders that have a chance to be in the majors and succeed when including  Mateo and Urias in the next year plus.   I see no reason to spend money on a muiti year contract for an infielder to block those O's prospects.  

The O's also have a player that has been called the O's defensive SS in the organization in Grenier if they need a utility player as long as he is not picked in the Rule 5 draft. 

If the O's want to spend they should spend on pitching and a back up catcher IMO.  Make a great offer to Greinke.   That move has a chance to move the needle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't agree.   Its all about Westburg, Ortiz, Vavra and Gunnar's performance on how they move up.  Westburg had a good Sept in AA.   He could be promoted to AAA a month or two into the season if he starts fast.   Vavra had a good 184 PA at AA.  These guys are not far from the majors.

The O's have six infielders that have a chance to be in the majors and succeed when including  Mateo and Urias in the next year plus.   I see no reason to spend money on a muiti year contract for an infielder to block those O's prospects.  

The O's also have a player that has been called the O's defensive SS in the organization in Grenier if they need a utility player as long as he is not picked in the Rule 5 draft. 

If the O's want to spend they should spend on pitching and a back up catcher IMO.  Make a great offer to Greinke.   That move has a chance to move the needle.

They also have 6 infielders who could be failures, trades or injury prone.

You think the money spent should be on Greinke and a back up C?  Wtf?  SMH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt there will be any significant signings until we start seeing a few of the prospects produce in the MLB.  Maybe next winter depending on the group of FAs (and system holes) we'll see some signings.  I don't think they are signing players with wins in mind at this point though.  More like reclamation projects or specific roles.  Odor almost fits the reclamation profile.  A guy who could hit 30+ HR and lucks into his career .722 OPS may have some type of trade value.

29 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They also have 6 infielders who could be failures, trades or injury prone.

True, those are legit risks so often overlooked in our dreams for a better tomorrow.  When the team has so many holes (especially IF/pitching), spending money at this point won't really do anything other than buy a few wins here/there and maybe a little goodwill with the fans.  We'll have to deal with the holes in the MLB level for a little longer.  As some prospects start performing at the MLB level, I would hope we'll see these types of holes legitimately addressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do feel really good about the depth of infield prospects Elias has assembled.   We don’t need every one of them to max out in order to fill out a roster over the next 2-3 years, we just need a decent success rate.   It’s impressive what Elias has done in that area, as the team had practically no infield prospects when he arrived.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Btw, i understand what he could mean to the team. He could put a ring on our fingers if he can be healthy and be there where and when we need him in October.    That’s the conundrum.
    • It’s just the up and down roles. I agree the opener aspect is the best way to go(to keep him on routine) but you are going to go from pitching 1-3 innings and then hoping he can go 5-6 again, when he is already likely to wear down because of the total workload. It’s all a big risk. I mean, there is a reason he has whatever deal with the WS he has and that if they went against that, he wanted an extension. Even he understands that it’s a risk.
    • You’re actually making the most sense of just about anyone on here.   Hate to say it.  Lol
    • If you use him as an opener, it’s not really “relieving”.  I guess I don’t get the issue.  If a pitcher gets hurt and misses a period of time, are you saying it’s risky to ramp him back up to a normal innings load?
    • Ah. So you can only get one pick per player? That’s a bummer. Reasonable, I suppose. But a bummer nonetheless 
    • It's true that this has been discussed, and there are differing schools of thought.  Some, like myself, feel that the resources required in a Crochet deal, might be better served addressing a more impactful need for 2024: a ToR starter.  As a starter beginning next season, it's likely Crochet's impact will be higher as a strong ToR starter through the final two years of control.  In the meantime, there are quite a few very solid veteran late inning relievers that we could deal for in order to satisfy that need, and that wouldn't require near the cost of a Crochet.
    • It makes sense to me for multiple reasons. 1) IMO we do not have the requisite pitching talent in order to matchup favorably against the leagues best in a 7 game series in October. That needs to change. 2) We don’t need extra offense IMO. Nor a back up catcher. We will be fine offensively if we don’t have one considering without both we are number one in the sport. 3) We could resign Burnes with that 50 million (not sure where you are getting that number). But so many here believe it will be a bad deal. And having another #1 in house protects us from having to be leveraged against signing him.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...