Jump to content

The Teixeira Watch: Part V - AM says the O's "have flexibility" on Tex


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Oh please. Give me a break. If you were fielding offers from various employers and they all were in the same area, except for one, how would you feel about that company? Insane amount of money or not, how would you feel about them knowing that they had the money to go higher? Would you think they were serious about signing you? A company that I grew up with low balled me when I finished my degree. Again, not a huge difference, but it was the principal.

That's my point. Not that 50k/80k thing. I just made up two random numbers.

Best thing to do is let this go man. It's a moot point and there's no need to really discuss it anymore. Just let it roll off your back and keep posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the posts over the last 3-4 hours have been pretty ridiculous.

1. Tex isn't signed until he's signed. Do I think he'll end up with the Red Sox? Yes. But I see no reason to cry about it unless it's actually happened.

2. Some of the posters live in a fantasy world where there are no budget constraints on the Orioles and they are on equal financial footing with the Red Sox. That's simply not true. It has always been the case that whatever the Orioles could afford to bid, the Red Sox could afford to bid more. If we don't get Tex, Angelos should not be blamed. Reality is that at a certain price, getting Tex is contrary to the long-term interests of the Orioles.

3. If we don't sign Tex, it is not the end of the franchise. It was NEVER likely that we would get Tex. The vast majority of posters have understood this from day one. Our path to success will never be through huge free agent acquisitions. Our path to success is by building more or less the way Tampa did, perhaps with an extra strategic free agent acquisition here or there to complement our young core once they are ready. Markakis, Jones, Wieters, Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman and a raft of other young pitchers is a very good base from which to build. Tex would have accelerated the process, but at the end of the day, it's the quality of the home grown pitching that is going to decide whether we return to contention any time in the next decade. When the pitching becomes good, we will have a competitive team, and that's when free agents will see Baltimore as a desireable destination.

Thanks. All very good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if Macphail believed he was out of this he would have had the perfect opportunity to mention it at this point. I just can't believe he would string everyone along if he truly felt he didn't have a shot at this.

We will see how this plays out but it seems like the O's think they will get one more shot at this thing.

This reminded me of a conversation I had with a buddy of mine.

We were talking about this whole saga and the possibility that Belkast may be being fed false info from the warehouse like last year to flush out leaks.

He alluded to this this morning/last night.

If I am Mcphail and I am spreading false info, the last thing I would do would be to spread what seems to be overwhelmingly positive info on us signing Tex.

Why risk the huge amount of backlash to erupt if we don't sign him?

Seems to risky of a gamble, playing with the emotions of a hardcore fanbase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if he doesn't want to sign an extension?

Something tells me that a young guy making under a million dollars a year with over 3 years till his big payday, would welcome a contract that would change his life overnight. Who wants to risk injury or anything else when he could secure his life forever. He knows the Orioles, regardless of the Tex outcome, are committed to winning again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That interesting - everyone's trying to keep the door open. It's especially interesting that they have indicated there's room for ongoing negotiations which means, to me, that they'll likely continue beyond tonight.

I agree, I think that the expectations that this will be over soon are going to be wrong. Of course... I'm still here, hitting refresh once every few seconds, but that kind of inability to face reality is exactly why I'm still wearing black and orange after all these years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminded me of a conversation I had with a buddy of mine.

We were talking about this whole saga and the possibility that Belkast may be being fed false info from the warehouse like last year to flush out leaks.

He alluded to this this morning/last night.

If I am Mcphail and I am spreading false info, the last thing I would do would be to spread what seems to be overwhelmingly positive info on us signing Tex.

Why risk the huge amount of backlash to erupt if we don't sign him?

Seems to risky of a gamble, playing with the emotions of a hardcore fanbase.

I agree. And also, they did that last year. Why would they do it again? Belkast and his source have talked about what he can and can't post IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yahoo Sports report is interesting. So, the offer was more than $160m but less than $184m. Either way, as many of you have pointed out, it's likely one or more of the other teams will beat that so it still comes down to which team Tex is leaning towards.

One thing you should know about the Yahoo writer, Gordon Edes, is that he was a Red Sox beat writer for the Boston Globe for many years and has solid Red Sox and MLB connections. He's generally pretty reliable.

I'm suddenly feeling a little less confident...don't suppose y'all will give me much sympathy on that huh? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminded me of a conversation I had with a buddy of mine.

We were talking about this whole saga and the possibility that Belkast may be being fed false info from the warehouse like last year to flush out leaks.

He alluded to this this morning/last night.

If I am Mcphail and I am spreading false info, the last thing I would do would be to spread what seems to be overwhelmingly positive info on us signing Tex.

Why risk the huge amount of backlash to erupt if we don't sign him?

Seems to risky of a gamble, playing with the emotions of a hardcore fanbase.

MacPhail himself came out yesterday and indicated that they are flexible with their initial offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is just more media hype that we're used to. If the Orioles were meeting with Boras now, I think we're all in agreement that "NESPN" wouldn't cover this nearly as much.

And they certainly wouldn't word it "expected to offer and sign".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I think that the expectations that this will be over soon are going to be wrong. Of course... I'm still here, hitting refresh once every few seconds, but that kind of inability to face reality is exactly why I'm still wearing black and orange after all these years.

Ditto - I have to hop on a place in the next hour, but I'll be using the trusty iPhone to keep tabs.

Gotta love technology and it's effects on human obsessive compulsive disorder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...