Jump to content

What is up with Bowie?


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

I want to be as excited as possible about our prospects, but I also want to be real. Is something else going on in Bowie? Is it the field? Is their league trash? Is it a league with a bunch of hitting environments?

What Henderson, Westburg, Cowser, Ortiz and Norby (amongst others) have done for that team this year would give the appearance that we have several elite hitting prospects.

Then there's Drew Rom, who's just been pretty good this year. If something is going on in the league, maybe he's actually been better than it seems?

So what's the deal? Are we over-rating our own guys based on some extraneous factors? There's enough weird results going on to make me wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I want to be as excited as possible about our prospects, but I also want to be real. Is something else going on in Bowie? Is it the field? Is their league trash? Is it a league with a bunch of hitting environments?

What Henderson, Westburg, Cowser, Ortiz and Norby (amongst others) have done for that team this year would give the appearance that we have several elite hitting prospects.

Then there's Drew Rom, who's just been pretty good this year. If something is going on in the league, maybe he's actually been better than it seems?

So what's the deal? Are we over-rating our own guys based on some extraneous factors? There's enough weird results going on to make me wonder.

Agreed.  Missing the Covid year impacted pitcher development more than hitters?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bowie is just a hitter friendly park that produces misleading stats (ex. Snyder, Montanez, Dorrian). But the contrast with Aberdeen is fairly absurd. Our hitters aren't as good as they look in Bowie, or as bad as they look in Aberdeen. I don't mind Bowie skewing as it does, but Aberdeen has got to be messing with prospects' confidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Bowie is just a hitter friendly park that produces misleading stats (ex. Snyder, Montanez, Dorrian). But the contrast with Aberdeen is fairly absurd. Our hitters aren't as good as they look in Bowie, or as bad as they look in Aberdeen. I don't mind Bowie skewing as it does, but Aberdeen has got to be messing with prospects' confidence. 

While this may be true, and I know it’s SSS, the last 6 games were in Hbg, not Bowie. They scored a total of 51 runs over that span vs 12 by the Senators.  PG Stadium played no role in that. They looked that good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, btdart20 said:

Bowie pitchers are about league average ERA and top 3 HR allowed.  

Bowie hitters are league average HRs and fourth in SLG.  #1 runs but we're also #1 in OBP.  

I don't know enough about the historical stats/park factor.  

Can you post those stats for first half vs second?  The team roster is a lot different now than, say, May or June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Westburg went up to Norfolk and was on fire.  Henderson went up and hardly skipped a beat.  Vavra went to Norfolk and hit better.  When real prospects start struggling from Bowie to Norfolk then I'll start listening.  Until then, no big deal.

By the way, Ortiz hit like crap for 3 months and now is a .400 hitter with power.  Same parks all year.  Don't sweat it.

And Cowset started putting it together his last month at Aberdeen!

Is Bowie more homer friendly than Aberdeen?  Without a doubt.  Should we disregard what Norby, Ortiz, and Cowser are doing or take it with a grain of salt?   Not me.  I haven't seen any evidence that they are going to nosedive when they go to Norfolk. 

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2022 at 8:39 PM, emmett16 said:

Jon Meoli wrote an article last week about how they run BP.  Sounds like Aberdeen is set up as a hitting “lab” - they are learning, changing, adjusting, and being challenged.  Sounds like they need to “graduate” that program before going to Bowie, and once graduated the players  have a much better skill set and approach to tackle AA.  

Jon Meoli really is the best writer covering this team. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Basallo is currently ranked 69th in OPS at AA, which includes stats from people that are no longer at that level (including those that were demoted, promoted, etc.).  Average age of players above Basallo: 24 He's the youngest. But here's the breakdown of those above him (minimum 50 PA): 20: 3 21: 9 22: 10 23: 10 24: 11 25: 15 26: 7 27: 1 28: 2 OPS by age group for everybody that qualifies in PA (at least 50): (ref: https://milbtracker.com/hitter-stats?levels[0]=AA&sort=ops&sort_direction=desc&org=&timeframe=2024&min_walk_percentage=0&max_strike_out_percentage=100&paginate=50&page=1) AGE OPS 18 0.544 19 0.800 20 0.747 21 0.734 22 0.701 23 0.677 24 0.664 25 0.682 26 0.682 27 0.620 28 0.686 29 0.652 30 0.588 31 0.676 Breakdown by age: AGE COUNT PERCENTAGE 18 1 0.22% 19 1 0.22% 20 7 1.56% 21 31 6.92% 22 55 12.28% 23 83 18.53% 24 86 19.20% 25 88 19.64% 26 51 11.38% 27 21 4.69% 28 7 1.56% 29 11 2.46% 30 3 0.67% 31 3 0.67% I mean, 90% of the league is aged 21-27 with 60% of the league being aged 23-25.  Basallo is putting up a comparable OPS to the upper echelon of hitters overall. And is OPSing better than *every age group* on average!  The kid is special. At age 20, Gunnar put up an 826 OPS across A, A+, AA. At age 18, Basallo put up a 953 OPS across A, A+, AA.
    • I don't agree at all. In the majors maybe, but not in AAA. Just my opinion. 
    • Oops missed your reference.  I agree it’s a great article. 
    • From a great analytics article on Mayo and Holliday in Baseball America.  I don’t want to paste too much more because we should encourage this type of work.  https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/coby-mayo-jackson-holliday-headline-10-statcast-standouts/ This is hopefully the last time that I’ll be writing about Mayo (hopefully he’ll be in the majors soon), so let’s dive even deeper and break down his analytical metrics vs both RHPs and LHPs, beginning with RHPs, as that’s his tougher matchup as a righty bat.   If you want to read these charts at a glance, go to the bottom row where it says “All Pitches” and scan for gold. The darker the gold, the better, the more purple, the worse the metric is. You can then scan up and see how that looks when broken into a smaller piece, such as sliders. All numbers are relative to the MLB average, so that you can easily see if he’s above average at something, with the caveat that this is against Triple-A pitching. Let’s go back to the analytical check boxes. When we talk about chase rates, we’re mostly concerned about chasing breaking balls (sliders, sweepers and curves) as well as offspeed pitches (changeups and splitters). The previous charts strongly suggested he was going to shine in that respect. Indeed he does, with minuscule chase rates against non-fastballs. This is a huge box to check. It demonstrates his tremendous approach at the plate, even against the harder matchup. He’s also able to avoid swing and miss against breaking balls the few times he does chase. For Zone Contact, I usually key in on the fastballs. That’s the pitch pitchers will typically use to attack hitters in the zone. Here again, we see more gold coloring, indicating Mayo has no trouble getting to above-average bat-to-ball ability in the zone. Now what makes Mayo an outstanding hitting prospect is his rare ability to make hard contact in the air. Against righties, he shows a remarkable ability to lift nearly every pitch type (including fastballs, which have a higher baseline launch angle), and does so with authority. I look through a lot of data, and I can’t think of another prospect that makes this much contact, with this much power, and also hits the ball in the air.   If you thought his metrics against righthanders were good, they’re even better when he has the matchup advantage against lefties, with perhaps a touch too much chase sliders. We see an incredible average exit velocity of 96.1 mph, which is borderline elite, and fully backed up by his elite 90th percentile ext velocities. At the risk of beating the same drum again, we see much the same story, an extremely potent analytical profile, where we have to zoom in on a subset to find something that Mayo isn’t (yet) excelling at. If he can replicate these kind of exit velocities and launch angles against major league lefties, he’ll be hitting a lot of home runs.
    • I want them ALL to do well. I have no ill will towards any Oriole or prospect. Lifelong fan and current plan holder. I want EVERYTHING to work out in our favor. I know little to nothing about Basallo except for what I read online and what I can glean from his stats, which is obviously not the whole story/picture. Hence the original post full of questions about him. Sorry you seem bothered by it all, but do you have any thoughts to share on Basallo? Or any responses to any of the 6 questions I asked in the original post? Or did you just get it all of your chest with that single, insightful comment?  
    • .500 OBP is much more valuable than a .500 Slug
    • Why not see how much someone like Jameson Taillon would cost prospect wise? $17 million a year for a decent pitcher isn't horrendous. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...