Jump to content

Odor isn't going anywhere


accinfo

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No, they are winning in spite of him.

They can keep him here as a glorified cheerleader who spells guys once or twice a week and pinch hits on occasion.  Any other role is hurting the team.

Well, Maybe.   He is hurting the team while they win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No, they are winning in spite of him.

They can keep him here as a glorified cheerleader who spells guys once or twice a week and pinch hits on occasion.  Any other role is hurting the team.

Your argument is logical and reasonable.  Did you enjoy the win last night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odor has his pros and his cons.  I think to say “glorified cheerleader” understates his intangible value to the team.  I’d be very happy if we brought up Henderson, sent down Nevin and cut into Odor’s playing time to get more at bats for Henderson, or some move of that nature.   But Odor’s going to play a fair amount, and I’m okay with it because I don’t want to screw with the team’s internal dynamics too much.  They’re working.  Odor screwed up twice last night but he kept scrapping and came up huge in a big moment.   That helps his young teammates understand that they can overcome their failures as well.   Hopefully they won’t fail as often as Odor does, but the message is still important.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Odor has his pros and his cons.  I think to say “glorified cheerleader” understates his intangible value to the team.  I’d be very happy if we brought up Henderson, sent down Nevin and cut into Odor’s playing time to get more at bats for Henderson, or some move of that nature.   But Odor’s going to play a fair amount, and I’m okay with it because I don’t want to screw with the team’s internal dynamics too much.  They’re working.  Odor screwed up twice last night but he kept scrapping and came up huge in a big moment.   That helps his young teammates understand that they can overcome their failures as well.   Hopefully they won’t fail as often as Odor does, but the message is still important.  

I agree about the internal dynamics but just which “young” Orioles is he setting an example for?   I don’t think of Mullins, Hays, and even Rutschman  as players who need that lesson.   I do think there is a team dynamics in place that Hyde believes in but I also think he places great value in Odor’s ability to turn the DP and play shallow RF on the shift.

Hyde just said as much. He cited team defense as the most important reason the team is where they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, yark14 said:

What he did tonight shows exactly what his role should be: late inning pinch hitter.  That is it.

100% Correct.  He SHOULD be on the team, but as a PH and occasional match up start.  The only positive stat is his late inning performance.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I agree about the internal dynamics but just which “young” Orioles is he setting an example for?   I don’t think of Mullins, Hays, and even Rutschman  as players who need that lesson.   I do think there is a team dynamics in place that Hyde believes in but I also think he places great value in Odor’s ability to turn the DP and play shallow RF on the shift.

Hyde just said as much. He cited team defense as the most important reason the team is where they are.

I think we're discounting that he could be setting an example for some of the pitchers. We often see him out there talking to the pitcher on the mound and whatnot. Who knows.

He won't be back next year, but it will be interesting to see who they like at 2B if they value arm strength over there. We know Henderson has arm strength, but he feels like a waste at 2B. If Westburg is fundamentally sound at turning the DP, he's my bet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think we're discounting that he could be setting an example for some of the pitchers. We often see him out there talking to the pitcher on the mound and whatnot. Who knows.

He won't be back next year, but it will be interesting to see who they like at 2B if they value arm strength over there. We know Henderson has arm strength, but he feels like a waste at 2B. If Westburg is fundamentally sound at turning the DP, he's my bet. 

 

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think we're discounting that he could be setting an example for some of the pitchers. We often see him out there talking to the pitcher on the mound and whatnot. Who knows.

He won't be back next year, but it will be interesting to see who they like at 2B if they value arm strength over there. We know Henderson has arm strength, but he feels like a waste at 2B. If Westburg is fundamentally sound at turning the DP, he's my bet. 

Good chance.  Henderson SS or 3B?  Does Mateo stay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see young players brought up.   I think we can do better than Odor.   That being said, there are two misconceptions that keep popping up in all the "get rid of Odor" threads that I think need to be addressed:

   1) A lot of people say things like "Why is Hyde putting Odor in the lineup every night?".    Given the composition of our roster right now, I think Odor SHOULD be in the lineup vs righthanders, at least when Rutschman is catching.   So that is probably 60-70% of our games.   The alternative would be using Nevin, or moving Vavra from DH to 2B and putting someone like Phillips or McKenna at DH.   I don't think getting Phillips or McKenna's or Nevin's bat in the lineup in place of Odor is worth the potential drop in defense at 2B.   So it isn't really a Hyde-lineup problem, it's a problem with who is on the 26 man roster, which is probably not on Hyde.   With the roster as currently constituted, Odor SHOULD be starting vs RHP when Rutschman is not taking the DH spot.

   2) Another thing a lot of people will say is that Odor is keeping someone like Henderson down in the minors.   I don't think that's the case.   It's just the opposite.   We have seen that Elias is very slow -- too slow for most of us -- in promoting top prospects to the majors.   He has a timeline, he has things he wants to see, perhaps he is playing service time games, perhaps not.   But the bottom line is he promotes guys when he promotes them.   And it is not soon enough for the vast majority of us.   We can discuss that all day.   But Odor is not keeping anyone in the minors.   He is filling the spot until we reach whatever magical point that Elias wants to promote a guy.   I think a lot of people take their rightful frustration at Elias's slow-play of prospects out on the guy who is occupying that spot in the majors.   It is not cause and effect, no one is in Norfolk that could be up here because Odor is taking a spot.   They are in Norfolk because Elias hasn't decided to bring them up yet.   Period.   Odor isn't blocking anyone.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...