Jump to content

When this season started I was happy with .500


Baltimorecuse

Recommended Posts

I would still be happy with 82-80 honestly.  Yes that would mean somewhat of a 'collapse' but I don't see how its fair to look at it that way.  82 wins is 30 more than last year, which is amazing.

 

Of course I want more - and I've actually come to believe they can do it! -  but I won't walk away from the season looking at it as a disappointment if they wind up at 82.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fiver6565 said:

I would still be happy with 82-80 honestly.  Yes that would mean somewhat of a 'collapse' but I don't see how its fair to look at it that way.  82 wins is 30 more than last year, which is amazing.

 

Of course I want more - and I've actually come to believe they can do it! -  but I won't walk away from the season looking at it as a disappointment if they wind up at 82.

I was expecting another 100ish loss season, so I would have to consider anything in the neighborhood of .500 to be a MASSIVE success, even if they "collapse" to like 78-84. 

VERY excited to watch the next few seasons unfold, should be a lot of fun if this year is anything to go by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am on record as being pretty optimistic in March and April...haha.  I saw the Orioles winning 67 with a whopping 15 game improvement hoping that would set us up for .500 next year.  

The Orioles are 58-52 going into tonights game with Toronto and the Orioles are .5 games out of a wildcard spot going into tonight.

The Orioles are playing .600 ball since Adley came up and .527 for the season.  I am going to wait until this is finished, but lets just say I am in the neighborhood of very impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the season started I had zero hope to not lose 100 games again.  I honestly was already debating if we were going to suck would I be happier if they sucked totally and got the number one pick again.  When the season started and we were 7-14 I was certain it was going to be another 100 game loss.

 

I will say that this season is so much more fun than hoping for the top draft pick.  Now I am getting greedy and want to see us sneak into the playoffs.   The 2012 season is proof we can do it if we get lucky enough.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I thought 70 wins was the absolute upside.  I would have been happy to just avoid 100 losses.

This too was my best case scenario before the season started reaching 70 to 75 wins. There's still two months left, but barring some catastrophic collapse this team is far exceeding most everyone's expectations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spleen1015 said:

I was hoping for 70ish wins where the young guys get some time in the majors. I hope to see some more of the youth in the majors this year.

I've really enjoying the last 2 or so months. It has been a lot of fun.

14 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I was feeling super-optimistic that, with call-ups of Rutschman, Bradish, Rodriguez and Hall, maybe the team could play close to .500 ball for the 2nd half of the season.

This is basically where I was heading into the season.  It's been great to see the competition even with "only" Adley producing in Baltimore.  And I'm a guy who thinks Rodriguez will be a bigger impact than Adley (and glad Adley is proving that a hard case to make).  And I'm hopeful that we see those guys mentioned plus Gunnar and Stowers before the end of August.  I really belive the best is yet to come!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to lose 100 games.  I think I would have been thrilled at 70+ wins.  

Any way you cut it, it doesn't matter.  Even if the bottom falls out over these last two months there's reasons to be excited moving forward.  In years from now, we'll point at 2022 as the season it all started to turn around and that the plan was coming together.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Right..if the Orioles can trade for Brenton Doyle (my favorite top target), why should we care that his salary is low? Also in that scenario, Mullins is likely gone, so payroll would actually go down I believe. But someone like Bemore wins would still complain because the payroll isn’t where he thinks it should be.
    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...