Jump to content

Dylan Beavers 2022


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I mean I guess he could.  That’s why I said likely.

But the age difference is huge here and if Mayo goes back to AA (which he will) and doesn’t tear it up, that will be disappointing.

If he does and he gets to AAA by June or so and continues a big ascent, Beavers won’t be passing him.   
 

Realistically, Beavers passes Mayo because Mayo hasn’t taken the next step.

Beavers is 4 months older than Mayo.  Mayo starts next year at Bowie.  Beavers starts at Aberdeen.  I could see Mayo break out but Beavers still pass him.  Mayo has the edge in power but Beavers, theoretically could have the edge in speed, defense, and plate discipline.   If Beavers advances well I could see if ranked ahead of Mayo even if Mayo has the huge power breakout.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baltfan said:

Will be our #2 prospect by end of next year 

Assumes:

Henderson, Rodriguez, Hall, Cowser, Westburg and Stowers have graduated.

Holliday is #1

Means he's above...

Our 1st round pick next year
Mayo
Norby
Ortiz (who could also graduate)
Fabian
Povich
Basallo
Kjerstad
Hernaiz
Some other International guy like Estrada or Bencosme hitting the snot out of the ball throughout full season ball next year.

Definitely not out of the realm of possibility, but a lot of that "he's above" section could easily end up the #2 guy even with Beavers having a big year.

This is a fun org to have as our favorite right now. We've paid our dues though. We deserve this!
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Entering this summer’s MLB draft, Dylan Beavers’ swing was the only thing that kept a skillset that features impressive raw power, elite plate discipline and tremendous athleticism out of the first round — and he knew it."

This statement by Meoli, the comments by the Shorebird hitting coach on his swing adjustments and the opposition scout rating make me wonder if Beavers could be Gunnar 2.0??? Is he a 5 tool prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I mean I guess he could.  That’s why I said likely.

But the age difference is huge here and if Mayo goes back to AA (which he will) and doesn’t tear it up, that will be disappointing.

If he does and he gets to AAA by June or so and continues a big ascent, Beavers won’t be passing him.   
 

Realistically, Beavers passes Mayo because Mayo hasn’t taken the next step.

Not necessarily.   I could see scenarios where Mayo is considered a top 40-50 guy but Beavers is considered top 25.   That would require quite a season from Beavers.  I liked the quotes about him in the Meoli article but I’m not going to get too hyped up about him unless I see some other publications starting to tout him.   And of course, Tony’s careful postseason report. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Not necessarily.   I could see scenarios where Mayo is considered a top 40-50 guy but Beavers is considered top 25.   That would require quite a season from Beavers.  I liked the quotes about him in the Meoli article but I’m not going to get too hyped up about him unless I see some other publications starting to tout him.   And of course, Tony’s careful postseason report. 

I think the scenarios exist. I just don't think its the likely outcome in this particular conversation.  Mayo already has the leg up as he is on or bordering on most top 100 lists.  Whether we think thats dumb or not, that does matter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

"Entering this summer’s MLB draft, Dylan Beavers’ swing was the only thing that kept a skillset that features impressive raw power, elite plate discipline and tremendous athleticism out of the first round — and he knew it."

This statement by Meoli, the comments by the Shorebird hitting coach on his swing adjustments and the opposition scout rating make me wonder if Beavers could be Gunnar 2.0??? Is he a 5 tool prospect?

I’m far from a professional hitting coach, but I was the game last night and his swing looks a little unorthodox. Not the setup, or the finish, but more so something with his hands/wrists mid bat path. Like a little hitch. Hard to explain. He’s been super successful so perhaps it doesn’t reduce the amount of time his bat is in the zone. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Master Guns said:

I’m far from a professional hitting coach, but I was the game last night and his swing looks a little unorthodox. Not the setup, or the finish, but more so something with his hands/wrists mid bat path. Like a little hitch. Hard to explain. He’s been super successful so perhaps it doesn’t reduce the amount of time his bat is in the zone. 

Sure. Instead of keeping his hands in position and dropping the bat head, he sometimes drops his hands and has a very low swing path which is not normal or at least not common.  I'm not sure if it's a bad thing though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Sure. Instead of keeping his hands in position and dropping the bat head, he sometimes drops his hands and has a very low swing path which is not normal or at least not common.  I'm not sure if it's a bad thing though.

 

Yeah didn’t intend for it to read as it should be fixed, rather more that it looks unusual. It’s obviously working 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Assumes:

Henderson, Rodriguez, Hall, Cowser, Westburg and Stowers have graduated.

Holliday is #1

Means he's above...

Our 1st round pick next year
Mayo
Norby
Ortiz (who could also graduate)
Fabian
Povich
Basallo
Kjerstad
Hernaiz
Some other International guy like Estrada or Bencosme hitting the snot out of the ball throughout full season ball next year.

Definitely not out of the realm of possibility, but a lot of that "he's above" section could easily end up the #2 guy even with Beavers having a big year.

This is a fun org to have as our favorite right now. We've paid our dues though. We deserve this!
 

Stowers and Westburg wouldn’t be ahead regardless of if they graduated.  Cowser is the only one that I think might make him #3.  Holliday will be #1. GROD and Gunnar graduated.  I like beavers toolset and think he will make a rapid rise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I think the scenarios exist. I just don't think its the likely outcome in this particular conversation.  Mayo already has the leg up as he is on or bordering on most top 100 lists.  Whether we think thats dumb or not, that does matter.

 

When I said it, I meant to convey how much I believe in Beavers and the skill set.  It wasn’t a knock on anyone else by any means.  Think more Gunnar type rising vs others not succeeding. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relative to "Gunnar type rising" for Beavers, when I look at Gunnar today the word that comes to mind is chiseled. When I look at Dylan I see lanky. If they can fix his hit tool and put some lean muscle on that frame I believe Gunnar type rising is possible. He seems to have all the other tools. Is the level of play at low A that much below what he saw at Cal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Master Guns said:

I’m far from a professional hitting coach, but I was the game last night and his swing looks a little unorthodox. Not the setup, or the finish, but more so something with his hands/wrists mid bat path. Like a little hitch. Hard to explain. He’s been super successful so perhaps it doesn’t reduce the amount of time his bat is in the zone. 

Definitely a lot of wrist movement. Totally different swings, but Rafael Palmeiro comes to mind as a lefty hitter with an unusual amount of wrist in his swing. Was a great fit for Camden Yards. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Relative to "Gunnar type rising" for Beavers, when I look at Gunnar today the word that comes to mind is chiseled. When I look at Dylan I see lanky. If they can fix his hit tool and put some lean muscle on that frame I believe Gunnar type rising is possible. He seems to have all the other tools. Is the level of play at low A that much below what he saw at Cal? 

I would say on the whole, it's higher.    Looks at most college hitters.  Hodo is struggling.   Wagner is doing okay.    Most Division I college players don't even get drafted.   Is the Friday night starter better than your average Low A starter.   Probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I would say on the whole, it's higher.    Looks at most college hitters.  Hodo is struggling.   Wagner is doing okay.    Most Division I college players don't even get drafted.   Is the Friday night starter better than your average Low A starter.   Probably.

Good info to gauge against. Both Fabian and Beavers are hitting and not striking out (0.9 and 1.3 BB/K respectively) and are bracketed around Kjerstead for OPS. They were both reputed to have hit tool issues but not exposed so far. Fabian has 12 XBH in 44 AB which seems ridiculous, Beavers has 9 in 56 but no HRs yet after leading Cal. Wagner and Young are OK. I never paid much attention to Low A before but these 2 may bear watching along with Holiday. Fun times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Btw, i understand what he could mean to the team. He could put a ring on our fingers if he can be healthy and be there where and when we need him in October.    That’s the conundrum.
    • It’s just the up and down roles. I agree the opener aspect is the best way to go(to keep him on routine) but you are going to go from pitching 1-3 innings and then hoping he can go 5-6 again, when he is already likely to wear down because of the total workload. It’s all a big risk. I mean, there is a reason he has whatever deal with the WS he has and that if they went against that, he wanted an extension. Even he understands that it’s a risk.
    • You’re actually making the most sense of just about anyone on here.   Hate to say it.  Lol
    • If you use him as an opener, it’s not really “relieving”.  I guess I don’t get the issue.  If a pitcher gets hurt and misses a period of time, are you saying it’s risky to ramp him back up to a normal innings load?
    • Ah. So you can only get one pick per player? That’s a bummer. Reasonable, I suppose. But a bummer nonetheless 
    • It's true that this has been discussed, and there are differing schools of thought.  Some, like myself, feel that the resources required in a Crochet deal, might be better served addressing a more impactful need for 2024: a ToR starter.  As a starter beginning next season, it's likely Crochet's impact will be higher as a strong ToR starter through the final two years of control.  In the meantime, there are quite a few very solid veteran late inning relievers that we could deal for in order to satisfy that need, and that wouldn't require near the cost of a Crochet.
    • It makes sense to me for multiple reasons. 1) IMO we do not have the requisite pitching talent in order to matchup favorably against the leagues best in a 7 game series in October. That needs to change. 2) We don’t need extra offense IMO. Nor a back up catcher. We will be fine offensively if we don’t have one considering without both we are number one in the sport. 3) We could resign Burnes with that 50 million (not sure where you are getting that number). But so many here believe it will be a bad deal. And having another #1 in house protects us from having to be leveraged against signing him.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...