Jump to content

It's time to play the players of the future


casadeozo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JR Oriole said:

He can't be the only one with that line over the last 15 games.  Feels like that is the entire team's line during this stretch.

Aguilar .111 OPS 

Vavra .250

McKenna .322

Mateo .374

Hays .520

Chirinos .566

Odor .602

Urias .670

Mountcastle .672

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Mateo’s last 15 games: .122/.170/.204.   Fifteen games is a long time to be that cold.  He needs a little break.  

Appears he has hit a wall. .658 OPS for the season now matches his career OPS. Looks like his hot streak was more of an aberration than a trend. I still think he can be valuable but mostly for defense. 

To Tony's point, I was surprised Hyde did not use Vavra to hit for Mateo leading off the 9th yesterday. Would have been the natural spot for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Appears he has hit a wall. .658 OPS for the season now matches his career OPS. Looks like his hot streak was more of an aberration than a trend. I still think he can be valuable but mostly for defense. 

To Tony's point, I was surprised Hyde did not use Vavra to hit for Mateo leading off the 9th yesterday. Would have been the natural spot for him. 

Barnes has a significant reverse split in OPS the last three seasons (2022: .736 RH hitters / .688 LH; 2021: .670 / .576; 2020: .866 / .493). He is exactly even throughout his career: .697 both sides.

So I understand Hyde's decision, especially since Mateo has provided an XBH 9.3% of his at-bats and Vavra only 1%.

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LA2 said:

Barnes has a significant reverse split in OPS the last three seasons (2022: .736 RH hitters / .688 LH; 2021: .670 / .576; 2020: .866 / .493). He is exactly even throughout his career: .697 both sides.

So I understand Hyde's decision, especially since Mateo has provided an XBH 9.3% of his at-bats and Vavra only 1%.

Good catch on splits, I guess I can see it. I still think Vavra is a better guy to get on base, and we need a baserunner to score. If you are praying for an XBH or HR in the 9th it seems to almost never work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Good catch on splits, I guess I can see it. I still think Vavra is a better guy to get on base, and we need a baserunner to score. If you are praying for an XBH or HR in the 9th it seems to almost never work out. 

Yes, I understand, but when you're down by only one run at home, it becomes something you hope for especially when the rest of the lineup has been unable to advance runners on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Good catch on splits, I guess I can see it. I still think Vavra is a better guy to get on base, and we need a baserunner to score. If you are praying for an XBH or HR in the 9th it seems to almost never work out. 

Also, Vavra was not even available!!

Vavra had come in to replace the injured Odor in the field and Hyde pulled switches that would ensure that Mullins, batting in Odor's #8 spot, and Rutschman, as a PH for Chirinos (#9), would bat in the ninth behind Mateo. Vavra would have followed Rutschman had anyone reached base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Also, Vavra was not even available!!

Vavra had come in to replace the injured Odor in the field and Hyde pulled switches that would ensure that Mullins, batting in Odor's #8 spot, and Rutschman, as a PH for Chirinos (#9), would bat in the ninth behind Mateo. Vavra would have followed Rutschman had anyone reached base.

Ah, got it. I'm confused by the MLB.com Gameday. From the way it appears, it has Mullins and Vavra as defensive subs in the beginning of the inning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of overreaction in here.

First, nobody is getting cut.  Odor and Chirinos are going to finish out the season on the major league roster.

Second, other than Grayrod, they're unlikely to call anyone else up.  And he'll only be up if it makes sense for his development.

Odor's ABs will be scaled back if they fall further out of contention.  But they're not going to nail him to the bench, and it really isn't going to have a major impact on the amount of ABs available to guys like Henderson, Stowers, and Vavra.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Pickles said:

A lot of overreaction in here.

First, nobody is getting cut.  Odor and Chirinos are going to finish out the season on the major league roster.

Second, other than Grayrod, they're unlikely to call anyone else up.  And he'll only be up if it makes sense for his development.

Odor's ABs will be scaled back if they fall further out of contention.  But they're not going to nail him to the bench, and it really isn't going to have a major impact on the amount of ABs available to guys like Henderson, Stowers, and Vavra.

This.  While I would like to see them play Stowers and Vavra more often starting now, my gut tells me that they're going to continue to play as they have over the next 5 games.  If they come out of Toronto in the same or worse position, I anticipate we'll see more ABs for the rookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a guy that played a good amount of CF, Stowers looks a lot more Mancini-like in the outfield than I thought he would. He's not exactly smooth out there, but I also don't think he's totally comfortable yet. Guys like Adley and Gunnar who instantly look like Major Leaguers when they come up are rare. I think Stowers will look a lot better next year when he catches his breath and gets his feet under him. 

Should they therefore be playing him more? Yes and no. I'd certainly like to see him out there, and I think we will once the playoffs are definitively out of reach. But while they have designs of wild card contention, Santander needs to play every day because he's 1 of 3 good hitters currently. Hays I think should sit, but it just doesn't seem to be in the cards. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair,he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
    • So thats because the extra space in the OF allows for more balls to fall in? If so, I don't really see an issue if its providing offense in a different way. 
    • I'm neutral on it. I don't like how the old dimensions played like a wiffle ball field. Both teams have to play on it and the O's do have two good OF's so in that sense it helps us. RHH will probably hate it so very few would ever sign in Baltimore unless they thought the O's were in World Series contention. If they put it in the middle ground then the dimensions become like every other park and Im not sure I want that. At least Camden Yards plays different. 
    • I agree with this.  It was a completely idiotic take to criticize the fans.  And Russo on MLB Network did as well.  Did those guys watch this team at all this year? They were under .500 for the last 88 games of the season.....the worst team in the AL East.  These were the home series they played over the last three months: Chicago Cubs (swept and outscored 21-2), Yankees (lost 2 of 3 and needed two Yankee errors to walk off the last one), San Diego (lost 2 of 3), Toronto (won 3 of 4), Washington (split 1 of 2), Boston (split 2 of 4), Houston (split 2 of 4), White Sox (won 2 of 3 but lost last one 8-1), Tampa (lost 2 of 3), San Fran (lost 2 of 3), Detroit (lost 2 of 3). What is that, 15 - 20 in their last 35 home games?  And then they top it off by losing to the Royals 1 - 0 in the first game?  So fans are supposed to be excited and encouraged by that stretch of baseball?   You want people to show up to games, play like the Padres. Don't have your prized prospects go bust, don't have your stars fall off a cliff, and learn how to play fundamental baseball instead of obsessing about each swing's potential exit velocity.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...