Jump to content

Fangraphs: Whose Contract Extensions Should Teams Tackle with Urgency?


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/whose-contract-extensions-should-teams-tackle-with-urgency/

Adley is the first name mentioned.  Part of the section is below.

Quote

Adley Rutschman, Baltimore Orioles – Six years, $141 million

Rutschman is the first player for whom the MLBPA’s new service time rule, giving the top two Rookie of the Year candidates a full year of service time, comes into play (Julio Rodríguez, Spencer Strider, and Michael Harris II all signed extensions). This means the O’s get four more years of Rutschman’s services rather than five, and a little more urgency is in order. Baltimore probably should have been in full-court press to sign him to an extension a year ago, but with Rutschman now established in the majors as one of the elite catchers and that much closer to arbitration, he’s going to be more expensive than he would be in 2022.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

I am not against extending Adley but I think the first guy they extend is likely to Means.

You might be right but I don't think Elias is in any hurry to extend someone who is still out with injury.

I am expecting the O's to not give any extensions during this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think there’s a chance on God’s green earth that the O’s are going to pay Adley $141 mm for one pre-Arb season, three Arb years and two FA years.   

Sean Murphy just signed away his three Arb years and three FA years for $73 mm, and gave the Braves an option for another year at $15 mm.

J.T. Realmuto earned about $63 mm in the comparable years of his career.  

Buster Posey earned $100 mm in those same years, despite having the advantage of being a Super 2.

So if Adley gets $140 mm from the O’s, it won’t be on a six-year deal that starts with pre-Arb 3.   

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You might be right but I don't think Elias is in any hurry to extend someone who is still out with injury.

I am expecting the O's to not give any extensions during this season.

I don’t think the timing on any one extension is necessarily dependent on when any other extension is done, or that they have to go in any particular order.   As to Means, I doubt the O’s would consider any extension until he’s back on the mound and they see what he’s got.   I think they could do Adley right now, but it depends entirely on finding a structure (price, length, options) that both sides are comfortable with.   There’s no telling if that will happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You might be right but I don't think Elias is in any hurry to extend someone who is still out with injury.

I am expecting the O's to not give any extensions during this season.

Yes, I agree.  I still think Means is the first guy extended and it will happen in the off season.   That is my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think the timing on any one extension is necessarily dependent on when any other extension is done, or that they have to go in any particular order.   As to Means, I doubt the O’s would consider any extension until he’s back on the mound and they see what he’s got.   I think they could do Adley right now, but it depends entirely on finding a structure (price, length, options) that both sides are comfortable with.   There’s no telling if that will happen. 

I agree Means has to be back and pitching well.  I just think there is a better chance the O's extend Means than Adley this off season.   Adley will cost a lot.   Means will be 2 or 3 years.

I think the odds are low that the O's extend Adley during the 2023 season.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of his slump right now, AR is a generational talent, and it's ridiculous that Angelos/Elias has not locked him long term yet. Esp when you compare as the article does to Rodriguez, et al. To me, AR is more valuable than any of those players. His price tag is only gonna keep going up up up from here.

That said, if he comes back and pitches well, I also agree Means should be locked up as well as we are already short on young pitching talent signed long term as it is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adley extension would worry me because he is a catcher. I have to think we already own his prime years. Still it would be a great message to send to the fanbase and he could be a great 1B too. 

The sneaky value candidate might be Gunnar but he would also have the most risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think there’s a chance on God’s green earth that the O’s are going to pay Adley $141 mm for one pre-Arb season, three Arb years and two FA years.   

Sean Murphy just signed away his three Arb years and three FA years for $73 mm, and gave the Braves an option for another year at $15 mm.

J.T. Realmuto earned about $63 mm in the comparable years of his career.  

Buster Posey earned $100 mm in those same years, despite having the advantage of being a Super 2.

So if Adley gets $140 mm from the O’s, it won’t be on a six-year deal that starts with pre-Arb 3.   

 

 

I kind of agree with this - I was thinking 8/140, which basically gives Posey around 20 million for having an extra arb year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Ah. So you can only get one pick per player? That’s a bummer. Reasonable, I suppose. But a bummer nonetheless 
    • It's true that this has been discussed, and there are differing schools of thought.  Some, like myself, feel that the resources required in a Crochet deal, might be better served addressing a more impactful need for 2024: a ToR starter.  As a starter beginning next season, it's likely Crochet's impact will be higher as a strong ToR starter through the final two years of control.  In the meantime, there are quite a few very solid veteran late inning relievers that we could deal for in order to satisfy that need, and that wouldn't require near the cost of a Crochet.
    • It makes sense to me for multiple reasons. 1) IMO we do not have the requisite pitching talent in order to matchup favorably against the leagues best in a 7 game series in October. That needs to change. 2) We don’t need extra offense IMO. Nor a back up catcher. We will be fine offensively if we don’t have one considering without both we are number one in the sport. 3) We could resign Burnes with that 50 million (not sure where you are getting that number). But so many here believe it will be a bad deal. And having another #1 in house protects us from having to be leveraged against signing him.
    • Starter and then reliever and then back to starter. Risky risky risky. 
    • Why do we need to outbid someone for Skubal? We still have Bradish and Grayson for years to come. Also a punchers chance at resigning Corbin Burnes. You know what our record was before we signed Burnes? Best record in the AL. You know what our record has been since Bradish got hurt? Tracked down Yankees and took 3 game lead. We have resources to sign players next year. Elias is a value vs risk guy. He got Burnes with Joey Ortiz which is a top 50-60 prospect. He’s not giving up top 10 prospect for a player with 178 innings pitched. I like Crochet a lot but his track record isn’t long enough.
    • You can sign a Chris Bassitt/Eovaldi/Gray type guy and trade for someone else.  If I were the Os, I would be trying to acquire a pitcher like Detmers, Cabrera, etc…someone with a great arm that we can take away from a garbage org and “fix them”. I also think a Luzardo deal could happen as I could see the Os trying to pry him away for 70 cents on the dollar and I could see Miami saying, we need to do something with him.
    • 6-4 (54 RS, 34 RA) 7-3 (63 RS, 59 RA) 6-4 (40 RS, 28 RA) 7-3 (43 RS, 31 RA) 6-4 (48 RS, 38 RA) 7-3 (58 RS, 29 RA) 7-3 (50 RS, 28 RA) 4-6 (61 RS, 60 RA 7-3 (46 RS, 51 RA) 3-1 vs. TEX, 2-1 at SEA, 2-1 at OAK Three series wins following the first 10-game segment where the O’s had a losing record.  The O’s were outvoted this segment thanks to yesterday’s 19-8 beatdown, but I’ll take 7-3 any day.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...