Jump to content

Texas vs. Arizona


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

The Diamondbacks highest AAV this season....Madison Bumgarner, not retired, occupying about $17mm of their $115mm.

 

Anecdote A that proves small/mid-Market teams can miss on a contract and still be a WS contender!  

B, C, and 😧 Nick Ahmed, Carson Kelly, and Zach Davies for another $17+m.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although, I think a lot of the illegitimate feel of wild card teams will be removed when MLB expands again.

32 teams means 8 different four-team divisions.  So you can get rid of the WC teams entirely, and only let division winners in.  

If you want to be "super-drama" and keep the playoffs at the current 6 teams per league, how about: the two worst-record division winners don't even make it. 

That'll discourage the formation of weak divisions, and make division leaders play hard all the way to the near the season end, even if they have a stupidly large lead in their division down the stretch.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2023 at 1:30 PM, ChangeRoadUnis said:

It is a great system if you want to have a fun little tournament at the end of the season full of excitement where anyone can win.  Yippee!  If you really want to crown the best team, you've got to put more emphasis on a 162 game schedule and less on best of 5 or 7.  

Right, there are basically two different seasons, long and short, likely with distinct winners for each. We want to think in the old way, Year XXXX Champions, yay! But now we have to divide our expectations and enthusiasm into two boxes, each with an asterisk: 

* Regular season (large sample size): Who's built for the long haul?
* Playoffs (small sample size): Who's hot and who's not? 

Even in the old system, fans gave disproportionate importance to the 7-game World Series winner, overshadowing the season-long records. For further nuance, teams like the 100-win 1980 Orioles are forgotten since they finished second that year. At least with the new system they get a fighting chance at redemption. (Same goes for the 1981 and 1982 O's which also missed pennants, by only 1 game each. Which is another kind of small sample size.)

So between the division or league's best record, and the playoff championship, which one is more meaningful and which is the consolation prize? Personally I give more weight to the former. But hey, we get to have a shot at both. They don't need to have the same outcome, since they are different ways of recognizing "the best."

Edited by now
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • My mistake!  You are correct.  I had the games reversed.  Thanks for the correction.  
    • I wouldn't extend anyone just because they're a fan favorite, but rather because they're also an integral part of the core, and hard to replace. Something like Houston deciding Altuve was indispensable, but letting Correa walk. Those kind of moves both help you keep winning and demonstrate commitment to the fanbase. Gordon was 32 when he signed his extension, not exactly the same situation. 
    • Your memory is a little off.  We won the first game of that series, not the third.  Our offense was flying high at the time.  Then we lost those two games to Wainwright and Rom, and went into an offensive slump we never completely emerged from. The team lost four in a row (next two were agsinstTampa) for only the second time all year.  Starting with the Wainwright loss, the O’s only averaged 3.57 runs/game over the final 19 games of the year, after averaging 5.17 for the first 143 games.
    • Current fWAR leaderboard: # Name Team PA IP Bat WAR Pit WAR Total WAR 1 Shohei Ohtani LAD 214   3.0   3.0 2 Mookie Betts LAD 223   3.0   3.0 3 Kyle Tucker HOU 205   3.0   3.0 4 Gunnar Henderson BAL 198   2.8   2.
    • Yeah, I'm kinda under the assumption that it's gonna be a while. He looked really bad the first time and the team is performing without him. No reason to rush.
    • Well I hope Rubenstein knew that when he purchased the team.  
    • I don’t know. Heading into this season, I said I didn’t feel Gunnar’s defense at SS was so good that we should just assume Holliday doesn’t end up there.    Holliday does need to work on his arm strength and my assumption was always that he would. Now, maybe that assumption is wrong, I don’t know but at his age and time in development and the size of Gunnar, I still felt Holliday at SS and Gunnar at third would be the best total defensive lineup long term.  That doesn’t necessarily mean Holliday would be the better SS but that the combo of the 2 would be the best alignment (this also thinking Gunnar would be GG level at third but not SS) This year, I feel Gunnar has looked similar at SS although OAA likes him a lot more this year than last but stats like UZR and UZR/150 don’t. He is 36th in MLb in DRS and 6th at SS (4th in AL).  I was actually surprised to see his arm is “only” in the 77th percentile.     I can see Gunnar being a high OAA guy because I think his athleticism will simply allow him to make plays most players can’t. I think it’s fair to say that Gunnar is an above average defensive SS but how far above average is he and is he truly an elite defender at SS?  I don’t think so but maybe he can develop into one?  I feel confident he would be at third. I have said for a while that all the defensive alignment stuff will be wrapped around where Holliday and Gunnar end up. For now, it seems obvious Holliday isnt a SS option this year unless an injury occurs.    As to how that could change, I think it depends on Holliday. I still seriously doubt he ends up in CF. It’s not like he would be the first converted SS to end up out there and that’s arguably a more premium position than SS in todays game because of all the FB pitchers but it would still surprise me to see that be the long term move. I also think we are overlooking the Westburg factor here. They may believe, even with the arm not being overly strong, that he is the third baseman of the future.  Saying that, I have never doubted that Mayo could stick at third. I believe he can. I just didn’t believe it would happen here and I still don’t.   I still think he ends primarily at RF and first base.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...