Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This is actually a good point in general..it’s easy for us to say yes or no but there is going to be some data and info that we aren’t privy too. If, for example, the Os feel it’s an easy fix to get Cease back to where he was in 2022 and they don’t value Kjerstad or Cowser as much as we think they do, then I feel a trade is much more palatable to do, even if it feels like we are giving up too much.

If they can't find a way to cut down his walks then I think the odds of Cease recapturing his 2022 form are probably slim to none. Every blind squirrel will find a nut once in awhile, but I just don't see a path to sustained success when you give them many free passes. It's the same reason that I think whoever signs Snell to a long term deal is probably going to regret it. Although I do think Snell's walks are much more fixable because it's more about him nibbling than it is his control.  Whereas Cease is just wild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

It's not as simple as comparing the two because Cease will be gone after 2025 season. Therein lies my concern. I really don't want Elias to be in a position where's he's doing an unintentional Vincent Vega impression when he scans the roster looking for five serviceable SPs in 2026. 

giphy.gif

 

I don't want the O's not making a move and falling short despite having mediocre "depth".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

If they can't find a way to cut down his walks then I think the odds of Cease recapturing his 2022 form are probably slim to none. Every blind squirrel will find a nut once in awhile, but I just don't see a path to sustained success when you give them many free passes. It's the same reason that I think whoever signs Snell to a long term deal is probably going to regret it. Although I do think Snell's walks are much more fixable because it's more about him nibbling than it is his control.  Whereas Cease is just wild. 

So you don't want to give up Povich but you are worried about Cease's walk rate.

My head hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you don't want to give up Povich but you are worried about Cease's walk rate.

My head hurts.

Povich is a 23 year old still developing player. 

Cease is what he is. 

Perhaps you should take some Tylenol.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

I understand what you're talking about, as a GM must take these things into consideration, but I don't think it's prudent to say that we have players A, B, C, D, and E even after the trade, so therefore it's okay to pull the trigger.  I see your post as a 'Part One' of sorts, and again, that's important in order to consider the trade, but the other part to why a trade should or should not be agreed to is perceived value. 

What is the value of Ortiz worth in the trade market (as well as his value to you)?  Same with Kjerstad and Povich.  Add that value up versus the other team's player(s), with Part One factored into the equation, and there's your answer.   

An example of this is trading Holliday straight up for Cease.  We would still have Westburg, Ortiz, and Gunnar (and Kjerstad and Povich), but we wouldn't do it because Holliday has more value than Cease.   I'm sure you understand this, but just wanted to elaborate.

Ultimately, the value is not what one person thinks.  It’s what two parties agree to.   The hypothetical supposes that the WS agree to that deal.  From there it’s simple.  Is that price to heavy and can you afford to pay it.  I stated my reasons why I think we can afford to do it.   Most think that’s too much.  If that was the only deal out there and it was a take or leave it and the organization liked the medicals and metrics on Cease (certainly no guarantee he’s going to be great) I’d do it.

Worst case scenario.  Let’s call it the Glenn Davis scenario.  If this trade backfires it shouldn’t be more than a bump in the road.  On the other hand, we keep all of the big 3, push Wells to the pen, keep Hall in the pen, keep the payroll low, and trade some of the logjam that’s starting to accumulate between Norfolk and Baltimore.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't want the O's not making a move and falling short despite having mediocre "depth".

I'm sure there are other moves to be made. The sentiment that our season hangs in the balance of us acquiring Cease is just silly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Povich is a 23 year old still developing player. 

Cease is what he is. 

Perhaps you should take some Tylenol.

Cease was in the majors at 23.

Povich's walk numbers increased last season.

You might want to cut down on the Flavoraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Keeping him away from the Yankees isn’t really the goal.

The goal is to make the best deal possible.

I still say Kjerstad or Cowser and Ortiz is the best deal they can get and there is no need to add a third piece.

But I also question if that deal makes sense for them depending on when their time table to start contending is.

I respect that, but I think the deal that would get it done is Westburg, Cowser/Kjerstad, and McDermott/Povich. They could kick in Kopech but that would be really complicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TommyPickles said:

Not sure if this has been mentioned in the 200 pages of Dylan Cease chat, but this was MLB Network's proposed Cease trade yesterday:

 

Baltimore gets: Cease

 

Chicago gets: Kjerstad, Ortiz, Armbruester

Toooooo much

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Not sure if this has been mentioned in the 200 pages of Dylan Cease chat, but this was MLB Network's proposed Cease trade yesterday:

 

Baltimore gets: Cease

 

Chicago gets: Kjerstad, Ortiz, Armbruester

I wouldn’t do it, but at least they’re proposing serious trades now. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last deadline the Sox asked for Holliday. Obviously, we said no. However, since it would’ve been 3 postseasons with Cease, we could’ve been willing to give up one of Mayo or Basallo. But that ain’t happening now. Maybe that’s why there’s no trade. The CWS are finally willing to accept our offer from last year’s deadline, but things are different now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...