Jump to content

What are your offensive expectations for Westburg if given regular playing time in 2024?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep, last year was 77 and even then he was a part timer, hanging on for a paycheck.

He retired in August with a month to go in the season.  He wasn’t Chris Davis.  I don’t think he ever had a multi-year contract.  Brooks wasn’t hanging on for a paycheck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I did answer the question. You assume that his playing time will come like it did in 2023 and I don't believe that is a given.   There are plenty of other posters here.  If they can figure out where  Westburg will play, how much playing time he gets and what numbers he will have then have at it.

For me too many unknowns at the moment.

The question is hypothetical.   You didn’t answer it.  We’ll have to live without knowing your answer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, orioles22 said:

The Orioles didn't have anyone like Ortiz in 1982. I think DeCinces was traded to make room for Cal at third, but since the Orioles didn't have a very good shortstop at the time, it made sense to move him to short. It worked out pretty well. It could also work out for Gunnar. I think Cal would have been just as good at third.

Pretty hard for Hyde to tell Gunnar that he is not playing a lot of SS after he won ROY and a Silver Slugger by playing SS/3B this season.  Gunnar believes he is a SS.  Looks like he proved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Pretty hard for Hyde to tell Gunnar that he is not playing a lot of SS after he won ROY and a Silver Slugger by playing SS/3B this season.  Gunnar believes he is a SS.  Looks like he proved it.

Gunnar is going to hesh up, put his head down and run out to whichever Hyde writes him into the lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Pretty hard for Hyde to tell Gunnar that he is not playing a lot of SS after he won ROY and a Silver Slugger by playing SS/3B this season.  Gunnar believes he is a SS.  Looks like he proved it.

He can just say, "Gunnar, you're playing third." I'd say the odds are he does play more short, but I just don't see Ortiz as a third baseman, and I can't get past that. I guess Mayo could end up there. I think Ortiz will be the best shortstop - not the best player, but the best shortstop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, orioles22 said:

He can just say, "Gunnar, you're playing third." I'd say the odds are he does play more short, but I just don't see Ortiz as a third baseman, and I can't get past that. I guess Mayo could end up there. I think Ortiz will be the best shortstop - not the best player, but the best shortstop.

That is a valid opinion.  But Ortiz does not have Gunnar's arm at SS.  That may be important. 

I have watched Urias play 3B.  What I like about him  at  3B is  his quick reflexes.  I think Ortiz's reflexes are just as quick and he probably outhits Urias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, wildcard said:

That is a valid opinion.  But Ortiz does not have Gunnar's arm at SS.  That may be important. 

I have watched Urias play 3B.  What I like about him  at  3B is  his quick reflexes.  I think Ortiz's reflexes are just as quick and he probably outhits Urias.

I think Ortiz could play as well at 3B as Urias.  But I also think he’s a better defensive SS than Gunnar.  If they’re both on the left side of the infield, I want Ortiz at SS and Gunnar at 3B.

By the way, I recall that when Gunnar, Ortiz and Westburg were all on the same team in the minors, they divided SS about evenly, but Ortiz was typically at 2B when not playing SS, while Gunnar played 3B.  Westburg split his non-SS  time 50/50 between 3B and 2B, playing 3B when Gunnar was at SS abd 2B when Ortiz was at SS.  So, I think 3B is the least likely destination for Ortiz, though I have no doubt he could play it well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think Ortiz could play as well at 3B as Urias.  But I also think he’s a better defensive SS than Gunnar.  If they’re both on the left side of the infield, I want Ortiz at SS and Gunnar at 3B.

By the way, I recall that when Gunnar, Ortiz and Westburg were all on the same team in the minors, they divided SS about evenly, but Ortiz was typically at 2B when not playing SS, while Gunnar played 3B.  Westburg split his non-SS  time 50/50 between 3B and 2B, playing 3B when Gunnar was at SS abd 2B when Ortiz was at SS.  So, I think 3B is the least likely destination for Ortiz, though I have no doubt he could play it well.  

Although I think Ortiz looks like a magician at SS I’m not 100% sure he’s actually better than Henderson.  Let’s start with the assumption that Henderson is a slam dunk to stay in the lineup and played an above average SS last year.  It’s possible, but unlikely to me, that they ask him to move while Ortiz gets an audition at SS unless they are super confident and committed to Ortiz which they didn’t seem to be last year.  Next let’s assume that Westburg’s best position is 2B and the Orioles are more confident and committed to Westburg’s bat than Ortiz which seemed to be the case last year.  Under those assumptions, the Orioles might like to see if Ortiz can gain traction offensively at the ML level at his 3rd most impactful decision without disrupting Henderson or Westburg.  He won’t hit like your typical ML 3B but neither did Urias.   If Ortiz does hit, then the Orioles can decide later about reconfiguring defensively and what to do about Holliday and Mayo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2023 at 1:55 AM, RZNJ said:

Although I think Ortiz looks like a magician at SS I’m not 100% sure he’s actually better than Henderson.  Let’s start with the assumption that Henderson is a slam dunk to stay in the lineup and played an above average SS last year.  It’s possible, but unlikely to me, that they ask him to move while Ortiz gets an audition at SS unless they are super confident and committed to Ortiz which they didn’t seem to be last year.  Next let’s assume that Westburg’s best position is 2B and the Orioles are more confident and committed to Westburg’s bat than Ortiz which seemed to be the case last year.  Under those assumptions, the Orioles might like to see if Ortiz can gain traction offensively at the ML level at his 3rd most impactful decision without disrupting Henderson or Westburg.  He won’t hit like your typical ML 3B but neither did Urias.   If Ortiz does hit, then the Orioles can decide later about reconfiguring defensively and what to do about Holliday and Mayo.

They wouldn’t really be asking Gunnar to move, as he split his time almost exactly 50/50 between SS and 3B last year.  Granted, he probably played more 3B in the first half and more SS in the second half, as Mateo lost playing time as the year went along as his poor hitting dragged on.   

Anyway, I think we will see all kinds of permutations in spring training and Hyde will make some judgments about Ortiz then, both offensively and defensively.  It will be interesting to watch how this plays out.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Elias should be aggressive.  I think last year, a lot of the players were happy to be there, win the AL East, best record in the AL, great season.  They have a window of 3 to 4 years, be aggressive, you never know what can happen.  Go into the postseason with just Burnes and Grayson as your stud starters and a bunch of question marks and make an early exit again...the players might not be too happy that Elias was not aggressiv.  That could impact their staying in Baltimore.   One thing Ripken has said, it was great winning the World Series his second season, he thought he would get several more, never made it back there.   Go after it while the opportunity is there.  
    • I don't see Angelos agreeing to $11M for a half season of Scherzer.
    • You may be right. But I am sure the players (most/hopefully all) can tell the difference between the chances you have with Povich/Irvin starting and with Skubal/Crochet/Scherzer starting (especially in the playoffs).
    • I have zero interest in trading any of these guys, but I think Holliday is still a cut above the other two because he’s going to produce a lot of defensive value at 2B (or CF). I still have faith in his bat, his minor league production at the age/levels he’s been at (including after going back down to AAA) is too good to think he’ll completely flop at the MLB level. Basallo and Mayo are very tough. Mayo is a simply incredible offensive prospect, and MLB ready now whereas Basallo still needs some development. I’m more excited to see Mayo at the plate than any other of the recent Orioles prospects, I think he’s going to be amazing. But his upside defensively is still limited compared to Basallo. At best he’s an average 3B. Basallo at best is an above average C, and even if he’s just average or even below average (but startable) at C that’s more valuable. Mayo may have an edge as a prospect over Basallo just by being closer to the majors, but there’s a better path for Basallo to contributing defensively for the Orioles’ current team composition by starting 60-80 games behind Adley (in the next 3 years we have Adley).
    • Have we ever had this big a chunk of $$$ to spend on stadium enhancements before?
    • Is last year what he chose to do? Or was it what he was forced to do given the limitations imposed on him? Of course, nobody knows, but it is possible that Mike’s personal game is to try and find unexpected solutions. The Lopez and Mancini trades, finding Suarez and several of our successful relievers, O’Hearn, Urias, Mateo all waiver claims, can only be counted as unexpected victories. Flaherty and Fuji are among his uncommon failures. So there is precedent. Mike certainly doesn’t want to waste any assets, but I’m confident that he doesn’t want to spend them at all unless he has to. I think I am the only vote for him doing nothing and I certainly hope I’m wrong, but it certainly can be argued that he is confident that more waiver claims, or “down ballot voting” will get him enough to continue the momentum he wants.
    • Who’s got the cajones to give that guy the take sign?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...