Jump to content

Why Ryan O’Hearn Must Go (Sorry, Ryan)


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Why would O’Hearn and his agent sign this?   He isn’t guaranteed anything for 2025 but the Orioles can keep him if they want.   No big deal to me but what is O’Hearns incentive for agreeing to a club option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Why would O’Hearn and his agent sign this?   He isn’t guaranteed anything for 2025 but the Orioles can keep him if they want.   No big deal to me but what is O’Hearns incentive for agreeing to a club option?

This is a good question.   He's 30 years old now.  If he has a very productive season, he could have set himself up for a nice 3 or 4 year contract from some team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

This is a good question.   He's 30 years old now.  If he has a very productive season, he could have set himself up for a nice 3 or 4 year contract from some team.  

OHearn is still under team control next year. This deal basically just means they don’t go through the arb process next year.

Also, unless he really blows up and plays everyday, that’s a nice salary for a part time player and maybe more than he would get in arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

This is a good question.   He's 30 years old now.  If he has a very productive season, he could have set himself up for a nice 3 or 4 year contract from some team.  

Yeah, my bad.  I thought he was a FA next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Why would O’Hearn and his agent sign this?   He isn’t guaranteed anything for 2025 but the Orioles can keep him if they want.   No big deal to me but what is O’Hearns incentive for agreeing to a club option?

Probably because his career is hanging by a thread and he didn't want to risk 300K by going to arbitration. He's basically a platoon first baseman who's about to be on the wrong side of 30 who has had one good year in the last five or so. There's a good chance this season is his last, and he doesn't want to risk leaving any money on the table.

At least that's my guess.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

We had offered $3.2 mm before, so it's $300  more, the midway point between asked and offered.   I can't imagine we'd exercise the option, but having it enhances O'Hearn's trade value a bit, in case he has a good year.

Also, with the option year, it's considered a multi year deal and can't be used as a comparison in future arbitration hearings.  It's an exception to the file and trial stand by teams.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChosenOne21 said:

Probably because his career is hanging by a thread and he didn't want to risk 300K by going to arbitration. He's basically a platoon first baseman who's about to be on the wrong side of 30 who has had one good year in the last five or so. There's a good chance this season is his last, and he doesn't want to risk leaving any money on the table.

At least that's my guess.

I incorrectly thought he was a FA next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Probably because his career is hanging by a thread and he didn't want to risk 300K by going to arbitration. He's basically a platoon first baseman who's about to be on the wrong side of 30 who has had one good year in the last five or so. There's a good chance this season is his last, and he doesn't want to risk leaving any money on the table.

At least that's my guess.

Bingo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2024 at 7:56 AM, Sanity Check said:

I find it interesting that there is a lot of hope (by some) that Mayo could be our answer in right filed.  He has not played the outfield professionally at all, and guys who have only played outfield in the minors  (such as Cowser and Kjerstad) are met with skepticism about just good they really are out there.  If a guy like Cowser - who has played outfield his entire life struggle when they get to the majors, how long would it take someone who hasn't played there at all?

And if someone argues that Mayo is an athlete and can learn it, what are we then saying about an athlete like Cowser who made many on here question how good he really is.

All of that being said, I'd love to see Mayo be a very competent right-fielder if that's where we need him.  I'd take it in a heartbeat if his bat sticks at the major league level. 

Elias has specifically said that Mayo would get time in right field this year.  He may not have played there yet but it is clearly in their plans to get him some reps there this year.  It can't hurt and helps to get Holliday, Henderson, Westburg and Mayo all on the field together.  If Basallo is good at 1B, then all of those four, Basallo and Rutschman are regulars and not time shares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2024 at 7:56 AM, Sanity Check said:

 If a guy like Cowser - who has played outfield his entire life struggle when they get to the majors, how long would it take someone who hasn't played there at all?

That's not a great argument IMO because it was expected that Cowser would look good defensively. Guys like Markakis and Hays and Mullins did not struggle defensively as rookie OFers. So it's weird and concerning that Cowser did. 

But you're right - Mayo should not be counted on as a RFer this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Yeah, my bad.  I thought he was a FA next year.

According to Fangraphs he has over 5 years of service time heading into this year so he would have been a FA after this season.  If so, signing a club option for 2025 with no guaranteed money makes no sense at all.  To pick up an extra 300K and avoiding arbitration where he might have picked up an extra 600K?   I must be missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

 To pick up an extra 300K and avoiding arbitration where he might have picked up an extra 600K?

Bird in the hand.  Perhaps he and his agent didn't feel overly confident that they would win at arbitration.  Easy for us to talk about risking a sure $300k for a possible $600k, but in reality that is a pretty big gamble.  Locking in that $300k is likely meaningful to a man with his prospects for the future.  Makes total sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

OHearn is still under team control next year. This deal basically just means they don’t go through the arb process next year.

No, he was going to be a free agent next year.   I think he was very likely to lose his arbitration, and not that likely to get a FA contract exceeding the price of the option.  So, he took the extra $300 k.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think Mayo's future position is directly related with what we do with Ryan Mountcastle. We got Mounty for 2 more years, if we decide to keep him. Does the timeline work out that the Adley/Basallo catcher split allows the guy not caching to DH or 1B, and Mayo takes the third (1B/DH) spot?
    • I think that’s a fair question but the follow up question would be do you think that would warrant bringing in a new GM?
    • Hold up a second. If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?
    • I think some fans are just inherently negative.   We follow the team so closely that we know the weaknesses of every player.   And every player, no matter how good, has weaknesses. Because a good starter is capable of being dominant in a given start, anything less can be a disappointment.   As an exercise, find a game where an Oriole starter pitched a good but not spectacular game, say 5.2 innings, 2 runs allowed, 5 hits, 2 walks.   Nothing wrong with that.   Not a dominant outing but in 2024 it's considered pretty good.  Now go to the game thread for that game and read how many comments there are about that pitcher, and count how many are positive and how many are negative.   I think you'll find the negatives VASTLY outweigh the positives.  I mean probably a ratio of about 10 to 1.  There will be comments about how he "doesn't have it tonight" after he walks a batter or falls behind a few batters in a row.    There will be comments about how he is about to implode.   If he throws a fat pitch down the middle that is hit for extra bases that will be pounced on.   If it is Irvin or Kremer there will be comments about how we need to get someone better and we don't want this guy pitching in a playoff game.   If it is Means or Bradish there will be questioning their health.   If it is G-Rod there will be comments that he has to be better than this.   Meanwhile, there will be a very small number of positiive comments.   Yet the end results (5.2/2 runs) is probably better than average.   That's just human nature.   Focusing on the negative is more interesting to many than focusing on the positive.
    • Great find Tony. BB% has dropped from 5.2 last year to 0.7. That could be a game changer if it sticks. 
    • Some of the root cause is both Ryan's flirting with All-Star form, but I agree entering the 2nd quarter of the year, something I now think will happen that I wouldn't have guessed is that one of Coby Mayo or Jackson Holliday will end up with 129 or fewer at-bats this season. Trade deadline will be exciting not just for Elias hopefully continuing the Corbin Burnes pattern of buying quality, but because it isn't inconceivable something like the Theo Epstein sending Nomar Garciaparra away move is in the range of outcomes. It is Adley year 3 of 6, and the decision might be to give 2/9ths of the tournament plate appearances to not Mayo/Holliday.
    • Well, I definitely was spoiled for a couple decades in my youth (70’s-80’s). The O’s were always as good or better. It was glorious never being afraid of being in the AL East. Then a new reality set in. That 14-year losing streak was way more humble pie than I anticipated. Now I don’t feel spoiled at all. I’m grateful I’ve lived long enough to see my Birds feared again. In essence, I agree with your original post.  Concern by some fans is always good, but it seems early to be throwing bricks at the TV (or computer screen) based on how well the O’s are doing overall.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...