Jump to content

O's 2023 roster vs 2024 roster


wildcard

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, wildcard said:

It is movement.   Players that were on the team are not here.   Players that were in the minors or were out most of last year with injuries will play.    Its not standing still.     It is a strategy.   It a way to keep players for up to 6 years.   

You want to call it turnout, fine.    But it is not standing still.  Its improving through development.

It is absolutely standing still.  The team should be adding players and improving while the new guys come up.  Wasn't that what we were always told? They'll spend when they are competitive? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

It is absolutely standing still.  The team should be adding players and improving while the new guys come up.  Wasn't that what we were always told? They'll spend when they are competitive? 

This is spending.

 

 

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can argue the length of movement. But it most certainly is movement. By allowing FA to walk you created space. That space so far has been filled with players already in the system. 
 

Argue for more roster change. Argue for better. But it is not standing in place and watching the world spin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, foxfield said:

We can argue the length of movement. But it most certainly is movement. By allowing FA to walk you created space. That space so far has been filled with players already in the system. 
 

Argue for more roster change. Argue for better. But it is not standing in place and watching the world spin. 

It is, in my opinion.  It takes an affirmative act to re-sign a player who is heading into free agency.   Allowing an FA to walk is not action, it’s inaction.  That inaction may be a good decision but it isn’t movement as I would ever use the term when describing an offseason.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, foxfield said:

We can argue the length of movement. But it most certainly is movement. By allowing FA to walk you created space. That space so far has been filled with players already in the system. 
 

Argue for more roster change. Argue for better. But it is not standing in place and watching the world spin. 

Agreed.  A decision was made.  Maybe a path of least resistance but a decision was made.  Actions of commission and omission both can be right or wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...