Jump to content

Multiple Choice: Who starts the year in the pen? (Choose only 3)


Greg Pappas

Multiple Choice: Who starts the year in the pen? (Choose only 3)  

134 members have voted

  1. 1. Multiple Choice: Who starts the year in the pen? (Choose only 3)


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 02/24/24 at 00:00

Recommended Posts

Kimbrel, Cano*, Wells*, Webb, Baumann

Coloumbe, Perez, Irvin

AAA - Tate*, Baker*, Vespi*, Akin*

* = 2024 option 

I think that’s how we start the year. We keep everyone. Baumann and Webb get the first cracks to hold down the #4 and #5 RH RP spots. Baumann could be DFA’d quick or even traded at the end of ST. Baumann has a better chance than we think to clear waivers. Teams like their guys a little more after ST and Baumann is out of options. 

I don’t know how long Baumann sticks around for. We might prefer to have the #5 RH RP spot for rotating in a fresh arm amongst Baker, Tate, Heasley, and McDermott at some point. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Really underscores the need for another RP signing/trade. 

How “good” would the player need to be to be better than Baker and Tate?  Plus, the optionable spot value. Even a guy like Scott Barlow  isn’t so clear cut likely to to outperform Baker/Tate in 2024. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RIght now it's Webb, Tate, and Irvin. Baumann flipped at the end of ST. 

That could change instantaneously, but right now that's how things look on paper IMO. The option does hurt Tate, but if he's dominant in ST, I don't think they hesitate to put him on the team. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2024 at 9:45 AM, ChosenOne21 said:

I went with the out-of-options players in Irvin, Baumann, and Webb

You might be right …. But I don’t see how they don’t have Tate in the pen if he’s healthy. I chose Baumann, Tate, and Webb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2024 at 12:23 AM, Rbiggs2525 said:

One possibility is Tate struggles in spring training and they use DL to by time for his debut.

Tate has two options as well. I think he starts in Norfolk barring an injury. they are not DFAing a guy if they don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...