Jump to content

Mayo to play first and third this spring..preparing for RF


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Clear is debatable?  But your starting infield could theoretically be 1B Mountcastle/O'Hearn, 2B Westburg, SS Henderson, and 3B Mayo.  The 1B and DH also gives Mayo some flexibility to get starts there.  Under this scenario, Urias is my utility infielder and Mateo is backing up CF and SS but primarily used as a pinch runner and late defensive replacement. 

The challenge then could then be finding a spot for Kjerstad. 

Also have to consider that not every position player projected for the big league roster will be healthy on OD. 

With Holliday as a defensive replacement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

With Holliday as a defensive replacement?

Holliday and Mayo likely don't both break with the team without some trades occurring.  The scenario I presented has Holliday (the younger, less experienced prospect) starting in Norfolk.  

Don't think it's that much of a reach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

https://www.masnsports.com/orioles-rss/orioles-spring-training-notes-on-means-wells-vavra-mayo-and-o-hearn
 

No one in this organization has a better attitude than Mayo. I can’t wait for him to be a full time MLer.

I find it interesting that both BA’s Roboscout and ZiPS put Mayo sky-high on their prospect lists.   These are data-driven systems not at all based on eyewitness scouting.  Roboscout ranks Mayo 1st, while ZiPS ranks him 7th (and two of the players ahead of him are Japanese professionals).   It was also interesting that ZiPS projects Mayo to “contribute above-average defense at third.”   I’d love to know what data leads to that conclusion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I find it interesting that both BA’s Roboscout and ZiPS put Mayo sky-high on their prospect lists.   These are data-driven systems not at all based on eyewitness scouting.  Roboscout ranks Mayo 1st, while ZiPS ranks him 7th (and two of the players ahead of him are Japanese professionals).   It was also interesting that ZiPS projects Mayo to “contribute above-average defense at third.”   I’d love to know what data leads to that conclusion.  

Interesting. Well, the Orioles seem to agree (for now, at least) about him sticking at third. That would be huge if he not only sticks but ends up being a plus defender over there. Still feels like a longshot to me, but crazier things have happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Holliday and Mayo likely don't both break with the team without some trades occurring.  The scenario I presented has Holliday (the younger, less experienced prospect) starting in Norfolk.  

Don't think it's that much of a reach. 

Ah, I wasn't clear you were talking about opening day. I doubt either one makes the opening day roster. But, I think Holliday has a better chance due to being a lefty bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I find it interesting that both BA’s Roboscout and ZiPS put Mayo sky-high on their prospect lists.   These are data-driven systems not at all based on eyewitness scouting.  Roboscout ranks Mayo 1st, while ZiPS ranks him 7th (and two of the players ahead of him are Japanese professionals).   It was also interesting that ZiPS projects Mayo to “contribute above-average defense at third.”   I’d love to know what data leads to that conclusion.  

His batted ball data is off the charts I believe.

He takes a lot of walks and he cut back on his Ks and started to post a higher BA last year (BA has gone from vastly overrated to vastly underrated).

Im not surprised that data drives his status higher than eyes do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Curious to see his range in RF.  Not worried about the arm, apparently he has a cannon

At least for Camden Yards, I feel like range in RF is a little overrated compared to just getting good jumps and playing the scoreboard smartly. I like Santander's defense out there even though he sorta drags an achor. He's pretty efficient. Markakis didn't have great range/speed. 

Part of the reason why I'm not really worried about Kjerstad's defense (I know we're talking about Mayo lol). I think he'll do just fine. Unless he's Jay Gibbons. Don't be Jay Gibbons, Heston. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

His batted ball data is off the charts I believe.

He takes a lot of walks and he cut back on his Ks and started to post a higher BA last year (BA has gone from vastly overrated to vastly underrated).

Im not surprised that data drives his status higher than eyes do.

His batting stance and swing are both a bit unorthodox.  As Fangraphs describes it:

He executes a pull-and-lift approach geared for crushing mistakes in the upper two thirds of the strike zone, and Mayo has succeeded with this approach all the way up the minor league ladder despite his sometimes ugly looking cut, which has a strange, choppy stride. If most hitters’ strides back toward the pitcher are “outies,” Mayo’s is an “inny” — his front foot often lands closer to his rear foot than where it began in his batting stance. All of his swing’s components fire in a short period of time, and it’s an odd look, but it works for him. He does, however, swing inside a lot of sliders, even ones that don’t completely turn the corner. Mayo’s strikeouts will likely climb against big league pitchers who can exploit this, at least initially, but he’s going to get to such big power that it probably won’t matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how the Os are handling spring reps for Mayo at 3B and working with infield coaching staff.  Allows team to internally assess Mayo’s viability at 3B.  And maybe just as importantly, allows staff to get more reads on Kjerstad as viable RF.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Why would he be part of a deal to get Cease or Luzardo?

I don't know, I'm not proposing a specific deal.   But chances are we would have to give up several young controllable players to get either of those guys, and he is one of our young controllable players.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with those who say he probably needs to figure it out in Norfolk, however, they could bring also bring him up for a look when any of Baker, Tate, or Vespi reboard the shuttle. Maybe Povich had earned the call up, whereas they don't think McDermott has done that, but bringing him up as a temporary move couldn't hurt too much for the aforementioned pitchers.
    • Big not necessarily tall is what he is saying.....Basallo is much thicker build, which actually may be better for a catcher anyway. Pudge was not thin--even before roids.
    • With this current starting pitching as is, barring an epic collapse by the Yankees, the chances of us winning the division are very low. Right now, in just about every other series (the series that Burnes and Rodriguez don't start) we are at a talent disadvantage. We have the #1 offense in all of baseball - we have scored the most runs and hit the most home runs and have scored 8, 11, and 17 in the last 3 series and we are all of 4-6 in our last 10 games. It's hard to see us being favored against even a decent team like the Mariners (with our starting pitching as is) given the talent disadvantage in the two rotations. Now we that doesn't mean that we couldn't/wouldn't pull it out. But I doubt that we would be favorites as things are going. And then when you look at a team like the Phillies with their rotation/offense/bullpen or even the Dodgers for that matter, I believe that even if we made it that far, we would be heavy underdogs against either opponent. I don't like our chances of continuously having to rely upon "beating the odds" round after round (I didn't even mention NY if we were to meet them). This is year 3 of Adley, 2 for Gunnar, and possibly our only with Burnes. Without making significant trades or major FA acquisitions, I don't see any near future scenarios where things are better for us, we have more talent or frankly a better opportunity.  Pitching injuries are so significant and so frequent in MLB now, that future projections are hazy at best. Because it is likely that you have to make pitching additions/acquisitions EVERY YEAR in order to seriously compete. If we don't make upgrades/trades this year, when will we do it? And what will be promised to us more than it is now?
    • I was wondering if you thought Coby Mayo should be brought up Roy.  
    • Cano hasn’t achieved consistent movement with his fastball, which really requires run and sink to be effective.  He’s also been hanging too many change ups.  I big part of his turn around last year was dropping to more of a sidearm delivery and his stuff gets flat when he loses that delivery slot.    
    • We need both.  My goal would be two backend bullpen arms and one starter at the deadline.  
    • I'm sorry but who cares about his walk rate. We are using Bryan Baker. We are using Suarez as a starter. We are using Vespi. We are not in a position to nitpick the guy's walk rate.  For god's sake, call up someone who has some upside. It's not like he's going to do much worse than what we have right now. And he might just go nuts out of the bullpen. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...