Jump to content

Julio Teheran Flyer


George Zuverink

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Spencer Watkins will hereby be forever known as Spencer Watkina.

Not a bad move to kick he tires and see if there's anything left in the tank with Teheran.  Maybe Holt the Wizard can wave his wand around and coax out some good innings.

Except the Brewers pitching wizards have more power than the Orioles and didn't fix him. Its one thing to get these kind of guys on straight minors deals or with options. My guess is he opts out after spring training. Why give innings to him in spring when we can use them to look at younger guys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Except the Brewers pitching wizards have more power than the Orioles and didn't fix him. Its one thing to get these kind of guys on straight minors deals or with options. My guess is he opts out after spring training. Why give innings to him in spring when we can use them to look at younger guys 

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

Did Elias tell you this was the plan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

I don't think he'd be bad insurance.   At 2M, it's not that big of a deal and doesn't stop you from making other moves if you need to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Did Elias tell you this was the plan?

We don’t talk anymore.  He doesn’t like me sharing his plans on the Hangout.   I’m left with taking the information I get and formulating an opinion.   It takes a bit of thinking.  I wouldn’t recommend it in your case.  Stick to judging when top prospects should be sent down during the season.  That’s your forte, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

Oh yea I don't think its that big of a deal I would just prefer it be a full minor league deal, it just gets tiresome digging through the dumpster thinking we can fix everyone. I am still hoping they go get someone a little more established to backfill injuries 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

You must have skipped the Brewers half of the coverage of the Burnes trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Do you actually the MLB postseason?  Most teams get their starters out by the 6th inning.
    • The whole “the key with Crochet” is exactly why trading for him makes no sense. On top of that, how does he bounce back next year after throwing so many more innings than he ever has? Im not questioning his talent, his upside, age, service time or anything.  It’s all on the side of the team that has him. But they are going to want multiple top 50 type prospects for a guy with ace potential and a lot of service time.  His name shouldn’t even be mentioned imo.
    • Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length. The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups. But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.
    • What do the Rangers do at the deadline? Do they just stand pat and hope next year goes better?
    • I don’t think he’s worth Holliday/Mayo/Basallo level just because of the injury/innings limit concerns, but he’s pitching this year like one of the best SP in baseball and has 2.5 years of control (which will be cheap years in arb, considering he’s gone through once at just over league min).  The key with Crochet is he has to still be starting in the playoffs to get full value from him then. That means either you let him keep rolling and hope the innings don’t catch up, or you do load management by some combination of skipping starts, pitch count limits and/or shifting him to the pen. I could see a team using Crochet as a RP until September and then stretching him back out before the playoffs when you have expanded rosters to help bridge the innings during the initial shorter starts. But it’d be pretty wild to see a team pay what it’s going to take for him to then immediately shelf him like that. 
    • This has been discussed a ton over the years.  It hasn’t been many but there have been a few. Jared Weaver was one. Searching through here or on google will give you the info.     But none of that matters imo. He’s not turning down that contract.  There is nothing but upside for him with that type of deal.  Now, maybe instead of 7 guaranteed years, we now get 6 (ie, we didn’t sign him to the deal before this season started, so that’s one less guaranteed year on the deal) but he’s not turning it down. 
    • Zero chance he turns it down.  The money in that deal is essentially his best case scenario. Zippy chance.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...