Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2024


Recommended Posts

Love Gunnar, but.

Guy's gotta learn to hit lefties. 
Guy's gotta learn when to make the more conservative defensive play depending on the game situation (i.e., tie game with no throw vs. walkoff loss with the rushed/awkward throw). 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, interloper said:

Love Gunnar, but.

Guy's gotta learn to hit lefties. 
Guy's gotta learn when to make the more conservative defensive play depending on the game situation (i.e., tie game with no throw vs. walkoff loss with the rushed/awkward throw). 

- Yes, he does

- There is no way that he should not try to make that play.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Career .885 OPS vs RHP.   (580 PA)

Career .582 OPS vs LHP.   (213 PA)

That is a pretty striking differential.   Not saying he can't improve against lefties eventually and I'm NOT saying he should be a platoon player.

But idk...........maybe............just maybe.............. he shouldn't be leading off vs LHP right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aglets said:

Career .885 OPS vs RHP.   (580 PA)

Career .582 OPS vs LHP.   (213 PA)

That is a pretty striking differential.   Not saying he can't improve against lefties eventually and I'm NOT saying he should be a platoon player.

But idk...........maybe............just maybe.............. he shouldn't be leading off vs LHP right now?

I don’t like him batting lead off at all.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

- Yes, he does

- There is no way that he should not try to make that play.

I just disagree with this. He didn't have his feet under him at all, there was never a chance that throw was going to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

- Yes, he does

- There is no way that he should not try to make that play.

Correct.  We would have been in bad shape if they just tied it in the 9th.  Gunnar went for it.  He’s a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I just disagree with this. He didn't have his feet under him at all, there was never a chance that throw was going to work. 

Zero issue with him believing in his arm And ability to go for that. Thats the attitude I want from my best player. It didn’t work. It happens.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

I just disagree with this. He didn't have his feet under him at all, there was never a chance that throw was going to work. 

Ha.  You’ve never seen Gunnar complete a throw without his feet being set?   To say “never a chance” is complete hogwash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Zero issue with him believing in his arm And ability to go for that. Thats the attitude I want from my best player. It didn’t work. It happens.

I do get this take. I just think you can be both confident and smart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Ha.  You’ve never seen Gunnar complete a throw without his feet being set?   To say “never a chance” is complete hogwash.

I haven't seen him make a play like that, no, not when the positioning and momentum is that out of whack. It's fine to disagree! I would have liked him to put it in his pocket. I'm not blasting the guy or anything. 

Certainly your opinion seems to jive with Hyde, who agrees with you. So I understand it's not a popular take. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

I do get this take. I just think you can be both confident and smart. 

Smart = not trying to win the game with a throw you can make versus settling for a tie (Pirates could have still won it in the 9th) going into extras on the road with 2 of 3 best relievers unavailable and Cano probably spent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was honestly surprised the runner got down the line so fast. The ball was hit hard and Gunnar fielded it pretty clean. If the throw beats the runner we win the game. If not, you still trust your 1B to make the stop. The throw was worth the risk. The risk just showed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Smart = not trying to win the game with a throw you can make versus settling for a tie (Pirates could have still won it in the 9th) going into extras on the road with 2 of 3 best relievers unavailable and Cano probably spent?

Where we disagree is the bolded part, that's all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, interloper said:

I do get this take. I just think you can be both confident and smart. 

No doubt….but I also think he thought he would get him, which he would have if the throw was accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Baseball is a funny game sometimes, but you're right, we are going to battle with starters that were not even projected for the opening day rotation. Yet, here we are. Obviously anytime we have a series against the Yankees it's big, but even if we lose 2 of 3, we'd only be 2.5 games back.  The loss of Coulombe is huge and that bothers me more than the starters honestly. Perez, Akin, Baker and Tate filling key roles if Cano or Kimbrel is not available does not make me feel great. Baker threw the ball in his debut back and has been throwing well in AAA for a bit, so maybe he's a little bit of lightning in a bottle that this team needs in the pen.   
    • Count me in, but the Orioles have never really subscribed to that theory of splitting time like that. They really put an emphasis on everyday players and bench players with everyday players rarely getting days off.
    • I agree with this. I just feel like he hasn't been given a fair shot in two seasons up here. I can't see any reason that he can't start 4 games out of 7. Give Hays, Mullins, Santander and Cowser each one day off a week and let him start. 
    • This is probably obvious to many but I have not seen it talked about. With Bradish going on the IL and the recall of reliever Vespi they are now in a 5 man rotation.    Burnes, GRod, Irvin, Suarez and Povich.    And an 8 man pen. It was hoped that Kremer would join the rotation but his short 3 2/3 innings in Sunday's start at Norfolk probably means he gets another start in Norfolk on Friday.    If he does well at that point he could join the O's on June 26th.    Until then the O's are likely to continue with a 5 man rotation IMO.   Even if Kremer joins the rotation in June the O's probably go back to a 5 man rotation in July because of the number of off days in July.
    • Some may feel that way, but I'm wishing that they would have landed them both. Even before the injuries the starting pitching was going to be a little light next season... it's possibly going to be brutal now. Either way, I'm going to enjoy 24 before worrying about next season.
    • That barrel% regression is really surprising. I haven't looked into his repertoire or to see if there is some difference in how he's pitching, but that's a crazy drop off.  I wanted him and was willing to give up Westburg for him before the Burnes trade. I'm glad I'm not the Orioles GM now! lol Saying that, I do think the Orioles may have gotten a bit better out of him. Plus, out of those last seven starts, he's really only pitched poorly twice including the last game where he allowed seven runs to balloon his ERA.  With all the injuries we've head, I still wouldn't be upset with him in the rotation now. But if Suarez can keep it up and start getting through 6 more often, he's basically what we had hoped Cease would have been for us.
    • You've never really been a Stowers guy and have always put a huge emphasis on K-BB ratio. While I agree that K-BB ratio can be important, I believe you had misgivings with Mountcastle as he moved up the chain for the same reason. Stowers is always going to have a lot of miss, but he's not getting much regular playing time and pinch-hitting against relievers is not normally a time to work pitchers so I'm not surprised he's been more aggressive. I still think if Stowers was given 500 PAs he's going to hit 25-30 bombs and put up an OPS north of .780. And I think he's improved his defense enough that I would feel ok with him in LF in Camden Yards.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...