Jump to content

Enrique Bradfield Jr. 2024


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, oriolefan1035 said:

I recall checking the box scores towards the end of Etzel’s time in Aberdeen and he was in CF with Bradfield in a corner OF. 

They switched them around a lot to give them experience at several positions. Bradfield covers more ground than anyone in CF, including Mullins.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Speaking of the Fangraphs article, I was surprised to see them give Bradfield a 45/60 grade on defense.  Bradfield will need to be better than 60 to carve out a role in the majors IMO.

Maybe they're adding in his sub par arm. He doesn't always take the best routes but he can still out run some balls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Maybe they're adding in his sub par arm. He doesn't always take the best routes but he can still out run some balls. 

Separately, they give his arm a 40, so I expect that isn't included in the fielding grade.   They do have him with 80 speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, oriolefan1035 said:

I recall checking the box scores towards the end of Etzel’s time in Aberdeen and he was in CF with Bradfield in a corner OF. 

Once.

He last played CF on June 2nd-likely the box you saw.  He had not supplanted EBJ in CF prior to his promotion if he played there once in ~20 games.  He got his reps in CF mostly when EBJ was on the injured list.  

He's not viewed as a superior defender or baserunner to EBJ by any scouting report I have seen.  Yes, Etzel is showing plus attributes but EBJ has 70 and 80 grades-they're not comparable in that regard.  Yes Etzel was deservedly promoted quicker but that doesn't mean he is more valued by the Orioles or other teams.      

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2024 at 12:22 PM, Frobby said:

League average: .234/.329/.372

Bradfield: .258/.336/.363

Basically, he’s a league average hitter who’s a prolific base stealer and presumably a very good defender.  You could justify promoting him with that track record, but there’s certainly no rush.  

Found the breakdown I was looking for. 
 

April he was 231/324/340

May 284/353/382

June 286/371/376

 

he’s definitely performed better after the initial cold streak, whether he was adapting to tweaks we tried to make or just a slow start. Would still like to see more impact, but is definitely settling in. League average slug from a guy known for having no power…not terrible. Hopefully it continues to Tick up and he gets some aa experience before the end of the year. 

Edited by OsFanInOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2024 at 12:22 PM, Frobby said:

League average: .234/.329/.372

Bradfield: .258/.336/.363

Basically, he’s a league average hitter who’s a prolific base stealer and presumably a very good defender.  You could justify promoting him with that track record, but there’s certainly no rush.  

Is Aberdeen a pitcher's park relative to the league, though?  Bradfield is one of the best hitters on the Ironbirds--are they below average on offense as a team or does the park hold their numbers back?  I know lots of O's prospects have struggled to put up numbers at Aberdeen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Three Run Homer said:

Is Aberdeen a pitcher's park relative to the league, though?  Bradfield is one of the best hitters on the Ironbirds--are they below average on offense as a team or does the park hold their numbers back?  I know lots of O's prospects have struggled to put up numbers at Aberdeen.  

Aberdeen is definitely a pitcher's park. Many have suggested there's something with the batter's eye that's extremely punitive.

This is from 2019 and earlier, but has the park factor at Aberdeen being at best neutral and mostly negative:

https://billpetti.github.io/minor_league_park_factors/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

3-4 with a walk today

And 2 steals. Good enough to put him at .726 OPS and 39 SB through June. Cowser only put up a .795 OPS there.

All things considered, EBJ only maybe is slightly under where we hoped he would be. I’d still like to see him finish up in Bowie. 

The ASB is June 15-18. Any word on if EBJ has made the team?  I think we could see him promoted afterwards possibly???

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SemperFi said:

Once.

He last played CF on June 2nd-likely the box you saw.  He had not supplanted EBJ in CF prior to his promotion if he played there once in ~20 games.  He got his reps in CF mostly when EBJ was on the injured list.  

He's not viewed as a superior defender or baserunner to EBJ by any scouting report I have seen.  Yes, Etzel is showing plus attributes but EBJ has 70 and 80 grades-they're not comparable in that regard.  Yes Etzel was deservedly promoted quicker but that doesn't mean he is more valued by the Orioles or other teams.      

 

Yet. At the end of the day, tools are what get you the big draft bonus money, but performance is what will get you to the major leagues.

I 100% agree with your statement about Bradfield and I still have him high despite Etzel getting the quicker promotion and doing better as a pro. 

I believe they will promote Bradfield to AA soon unless they have him working on something specific and think he still needs to work on them in A Ball. 

Once Fabian or Beavers gets promoted to AAA, that will open up a spot for Bradfield to get some AAA reps. I think his performance there will give us a better indication of what they have in him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Aberdeen is definitely a pitcher's park. Many have suggested there's something with the batter's eye that's extremely punitive.

This is from 2019 and earlier, but has the park factor at Aberdeen being at best neutral and mostly negative:

https://billpetti.github.io/minor_league_park_factors/

Small-ish batters eye and deep power alleys. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Aberdeen is definitely a pitcher's park. Many have suggested there's something with the batter's eye that's extremely punitive.

This is from 2019 and earlier, but has the park factor at Aberdeen being at best neutral and mostly negative:

https://billpetti.github.io/minor_league_park_factors/

Bradfield has put up a line of .326/.404/.449/.853 in his home games, so I don't think the park is bothering him much.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 733baseball said:

Small-ish batters eye and deep power alleys. 

What I have heard about the batter's eye is that it is made of some kind of mesh and at certain time of day, light shines through it.   This was from a Darrell Hernaiz interview a couple of years ago.   Also, the lights aren't that good, per Hernaiz.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

What I have heard about the batter's eye is that it is made of some kind of mesh and at certain time of day, light shines through it.   This was from a Darrell Hernaiz interview a couple of years ago.   Also, the lights aren't that good, per Hernaiz.  

IIRC, there were complaints about auxiliary lights past the outfield. If they're the ones I'm thinking of, they're no longer on during games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Palmer had arm problems that he overcame. Thinking back, I don't remeber the Orioles losing a starter due to arm problems in the 70's. I could be misremembering. Plus, those pitchers pitched a lot more innings. Nothing like recent history as far as pitchers'  injuries. And Palmer's peers didn't have the year round facilities to lean on. Hell, they played basketball or worked jobs in the off season.  Us older guys just tougher!! 😄 Never-the-less, I don't buy Smoltz. It's generally standard for prior generations to ascribe to their way. I think there are probably a number of reasons for the current fragility of pitching - most have been mentioned above - and that organizations as a result will start looking differently at long range contracts. Boras Beware!!!!!!!!!!!! Next round of bargaining should be interesting as all the experts dive into this issue. Meanwhile, just waiting for the next headline. The list since 2016 above is unreal!  It's almost like Tommy John has become the tonsillectomy of pitching.  
    • I have iPhone and click on right , the menu or settings , look for CC or closed captioned, click select . I do the same thing with wall mounted flat screen, click settings , then click closed captioning again . I don’t have cable tv , so live streaming apps only available for now 
    • I found this article pretty interesting. https://www.leanblog.org/2024/04/theres-no-special-cause-of-common-cause-variation-tommy-john-surgeries/
    • To me, Westy does not possess the lateral quickness for CF.  And his throwing motion is too short-armed for OF and would need to be reworked. 
    • Disappointing that Smotlz would make this argument.  One would have to assume he is simply making this about pushing back on the pitch clock.  I know we live in a world where people make statements as if they are facts, when they are really just opinions but still... In my opinion we shouldn't do it that way. 😎
    • Not much data aggregated prior to 2016. The guy running the TJS tracker is doing it on his own time. I'd love to see some historical info going back decades, though.  There's this article...but curious how extensive it's been considering there's been improvements to the surgery and it's still a relatively new surgery in terms of adoption which really didn't start taking off until the 90s: https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2018/The-Tommy-John-Surgery-Explosion-in-the-MLB
    • I have some ideas regarding the O's "Three Body Problem": Westburg, Holliday, and Mayo.  I admit this may be more of a 2025+ issue, but wanted to get it out there. Unless we trade Mountcastle, we have three players for two spots: 2B & 3B.  Holliday at 2B, Mayo at 3B, and Westburg at either.  Sure, Mayo could DH, or get tried in RF himself.  But it seems the O's prefer him at 3B with some AB's at 1B on occasion.  I've previously discussed the merits of trying Holliday in CF, perhaps beginning this off-season.  Holliday is athletic enough and fast enough to handle CF and has a good arm to boot.  I believe, like many former SS's before, that he would be able to transition fairly quickly.  But a guy who may be just as athletic and perhaps even a bit faster, is Westburg.  The same thoughts about a transition to CF apply to Westburg.  Having such versatility would benefit the team, and having either Holliday or Westburg playing CF would resolve the crowded infield issue.  Holliday or Westburg would also be able to play the infield on occasion as well.  Westburg in particular could be similar to Ben Zobrist, in that regard.   I understand some will point to Enrique Bradfield Jr as the possible heir apparent in a couple of years.  He may or not be, but almost certainly not as soon as next season.  I'm also not convinced Cedric Mullins will be the answer in '25, but we have him under control for another season. So, unless any of Mountcastle, Westburg, Holliday, or Mayo are traded, thinking creatively could bring a resolution to the matter.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...