Jump to content

MLB Ready to Announce PED Suspension (Volquez)


glorydays

Recommended Posts

I was thinking the same thing Shack. What are they doing, leaking one clue at a time?

From what Craig said earlier is that if he gave the name it would reveal who told him.

Or it's a source so well-placed that if he or she gave me the name he or she would be outed as the source because so few people know the information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bronson Arroyo had that article some months back where he admitted he puts tons of supplements in his body, and he isn't sure if they were all necessarily MLB approved. Could be him, I suppose, but of course that is a random guess like everyone else is making.

EDIT: Here is the article I was talking about: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4396083

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does this become a game of 20 questions? If it's a leak, then wouldn't a decent leak know who the hell it is?
From what Craig said earlier is that if he gave the name it would reveal who told him.

He can't say who it is or it gives away his source?

But then it's OK to say it's not a NY player.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL pitcher.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL-Central pitcher.

But it's not OK to say who it is?

I'm calling shenanigans. Sounds to me like somebody wanted to be the center of attention...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can't say who it is or it gives away his source?

But then it's OK to say it's not a NY player.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL pitcher.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL-Central pitcher.

But it's not OK to say who it is?

I'm calling shenanigans. Sounds to me like somebody wanted to be the center of attention...

Well duh.

letters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By he in my above quote I meant he/she as in Craig's source. Sorry I wasn't clear on that I thought Craig's actual quote cleared it up. If you think Craig is just jerking folks along I don't think its his style. I have been reading him since his Shysterball days and I think its more a matter of him not being used to having actual "sources" in the know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can't say who it is or it gives away his source?

But then it's OK to say it's not a NY player.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL pitcher.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL-Central pitcher.

But it's not OK to say who it is?

I'm calling shenanigans. Sounds to me like somebody wanted to be the center of attention...

The next two clues will be...

"He plays for (insert team name here)."

"He wears number (insert number here)."

"See source, I didn't name him. See? See?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can't say who it is or it gives away his source?

But then it's OK to say it's not a NY player.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL pitcher.

Then, it's OK to say it's an NL-Central pitcher.

But it's not OK to say who it is?

I'm calling shenanigans. Sounds to me like somebody wanted to be the center of attention...

So what, does that make it false? Why care?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what, does that make it false? Why care?
Because being self-righteous also makes you the center of attention.

Oh, great... the guy is dribbling out clues and BS'ing everybody about why he's being a tease... and I'm self-righteous for just pointing out he's being a tease? Uh-huh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's what I was afraid of.  I'm sure Elias will kick the tires.  WS will be asking for package headed by one of Holliday, Mayo or Basallo.  Maybe price will come down in the offseason.
    • Suarez is probably going to have to go back to the pen. We just don’t have enough arms there to make it through the season, especially with having very few relievers who can pitch more than 1 inning. Even though Suarez has been the much better pitcher than Kremer, he gives you no length. He is the basic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher.  I guess they could try Kremer as a back end reliever given his strike out stuff and penchant for not being able to go through a lineup a third time. However, the downside to that is his susceptibility to the long ball.
    • This is Crochet's first full year back from TJS after 12 IP last year. You'd have to think if you are trading for him, it's not for this year, but next year as he's likely only got a few more starts left him if he's handled responsibly, which he should be, coming back from TJS. He's under control through the 2026 season and there is value in that even though he's arb eligible and will likely get a nice bump in salary.
    • Luzardo screams "flames out in a few years" to me. No thanks, or at least for what he'll cost. Robert has played literally one full season of baseball in his entire life. Again, too much risk and no thanks. Crochet would be a good target, because we get him for 2 1/2 years and is an elite lefty. Given where CHW are, a package with Kjerstad and one of our young pitchers (headlining) makes sense for both teams.  If we are forced to effectively give up on Mullins or Hays (either BC of injury or general suckiness), Taylor Ward does make sense. His name has been tossed around a lot. His splits playing against AL East teams kinda scare me, but he's a RH bat that can play good defensive OF and under team control for a few years and probably won't cost much. As for bullpen arms, this seems like the hardest to predict. CHW doesn't really have anybody pitching well there. The Marlins have our old friend Tanner Scott, but he isn't anything near a sure thing like other experienced closers. Mason Miller will cost too much. Chapman may make sense if DC is out. As a 36 year old rental he won't cost as much, which will be important if we go all in for a starter. His wildness will make our blood boil but he still has the swing and miss stuff and obviously a ton of playoff experience. Maybe Beeks from COL? Another lefty bullpen rental.
    • I was against the idea of a Crochet addition before the Bradish injury because I didn’t see the need. Now, I’m all for it. He would be a gamble but a much better buy than Luzardo who is not pitching well at all this season. He (Luzardo) would be the kind of non-impact move that we tried last year, that blew up in our faces.  On the other hand Robert is more of a luxury move than a need. IMO the needs are now top end starting pitcher (#2/3 type) AND shut down reliever. Anything addition beyond that is gravy. The priorities are pitching.
    • I think a RH bat is all we need offensively. I’d look at JD Martinez. 
    • How do other teams have ANY leverage? It’s not like Elias is forced to deal with them. If he was only dealing with one yea they would have leverage because the Orioles have a need on the roster. But because there are MULTIPLE with MULTIPLE players he can move on from any team and they will get nothing from us. Those other teams are incentivized to move their players JUST AS MUCH as we are incentivized to add. NOBODY is getting Westburg (or even asking for him at this point) or ANY OTHER MAINSTAY Major Leaguer of the roster. That’s not how the trade deadline works. As I mentioned nobody is going to the Yankees and saying give us Gil, Soto, Judge, Rodon, etc. Nobody is asking the Dodgers for Betts, Freeman, Ohtani, etc. Teams who are rebuilding/selling are asking for prospects. Oakland and the Chicago White Sox are not one player or even one year away. Guys who are already established now (even young ones like Jordan Westburg) do nothing for them in their phase of rebuilding.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...