Jump to content

Let's Give Chris Davis Some Credit


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

I think the layout of Camden Yards is such that a slow LF really costs you. RF requires skill and a good arm (like Markakis has), LF requires a guy who can run (not that Luke Scott was a burner, but he was still probably faster than Davis). It will be interesting to see if the O's try Davis in LF when Markakis is back.
I think a Davis try out in LF is the plan. Is he really slower than Like Scott?" I think people make assumptions about Davis because of his size. He doesn't look that slow to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think a Davis try out in LF is the plan. Is he really slower than Like Scott?" I think people make assumptions about Davis because of his size. He doesn't look that slow to me.

He does need sometimes to be reminded to start running toward first base. Also, a visual illusion is created b/c of how quickly his broken bats go flying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they're gonna go with Reynolds back at third (I know, I know...) Davis at 1st, Thome DH and X in LF. Good power throughout, bad infield defense but good defense in LF and a bit of speed in the lineup.

Or Davis at third, Reynolds at first.

What abt Betemit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He really is a mystifying player. I have to be honest, he has looked way better in the OF than I ever would have guessed. As to his offense, I try to keep in mind that he still has only 1,360 plate appearances in the major leagues, and this is really the first chance he has had to play nearly every day. I think there is still some room for growth. If Davis could be a guy who puts up an .825-.850 OPS and is capable of playing 1B, 3B or a corner OF spot when needed, he'd be pretty valuable. I don't see him as a plus defender at any of those spots, but if he can be semi-competent at all of them, that has value.

It's a big plus for me that he's been hitting well against southpaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What abt Betemit?
Betemits fileding metrics at 3B aren't all that bad in spite of his errors. He is a liability, but nothing like Reynolds at 3B. Reynolds has looked good at 1B and Betemit/Andino at 3B has been OK most of the time. Davis has looked OK in RF. I see no reason to switch things around. Let Davis/Pearce play LF, and DH Davis on Thome's days off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a Davis try out in LF is the plan. Is he really slower than Like Scott? I think people make assumptions about Davis because of his size. He doesn't look that slow to me.

If I had to guess, I'd say Scott was a little faster. You are right that it's not by that much. I'd probably pick Davis in a footrace to 1B with Hardy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had to guess, I'd say Scott was a little faster. You are right that it's not by that much. I'd probably pick Davis in a footrace to 1B with Hardy.
Boog Powell played 3429 IN in LF from ages 19 -23, and was league average there, according to his Rtot. Was he faster than Davis?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today''s faux pas not withstanding he has looked good to me in LF. I have seen AJ do the same thing a number of times. Davis seems to get good jumps and has surprising speed for someone his size. He also has a great arm. I am more concerned with his bat than his glove, no matter where he plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

How good can Chris Davis really be? The guy is CRUSHING the ball right now, and is proving that if he is hot, you can put him at DH or even the OF if his bat is good enough.

I'm even willing to go this far. If Davis improves next year, even if its just by a little bit. Maybe his OBP goes up some. I think that in the 2013-2014 offseason, it's time to talk extension. That is if he improves next year, but I LOVE his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How good can Chris Davis really be? The guy is CRUSHING the ball right now, and is proving that if he is hot, you can put him at DH or even the OF if his bat is good enough.

I'm even willing to go this far. If Davis improves next year, even if its just by a little bit. Maybe his OBP goes up some. I think that in the 2013-2014 offseason, it's time to talk extension. That is if he improves next year, but I LOVE his potential.

I gave you some rep for your OP, but I should take it away now that I see you bumped your own thread. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How good can Chris Davis really be? The guy is CRUSHING the ball right now, and is proving that if he is hot, you can put him at DH or even the OF if his bat is good enough.

I'm even willing to go this far. If Davis improves next year, even if its just by a little bit. Maybe his OBP goes up some. I think that in the 2013-2014 offseason, it's time to talk extension. That is if he improves next year, but I LOVE his potential.

I love him and really hope he stays an Oriole. I think he could really blossom. Furthermore, he just started playing outfield in the middle of the season; with a little off-season work, I think he could be a solid RFers or occassional Lfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...