Jump to content

Opportunity knocks for Ryan Flaherty


postal

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 438
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It would be so huge for the Orioles if Flaherty established himself as a solid regular.

I know he struck out looking early in the game, but his batting eye seems to have improved a ton. He isn't chasing all that breaking junk in the dirt and/or outside the zone like in the past. I'm too lazy to look it up, but I'm sure his surge correlates to a big drop in strikeouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be so huge for the Orioles if Flaherty established himself as a solid regular.

Glad to have Roberts on the roster, but Flaherty is on a roll and I worry about taking away at bats right now....his OPS is .789 in June. Roberts' career OPS is .765 and he's unlikely to be a factor for the O's beyond this season. Plus Ryan's defense is terrific. Ultimate irony that we finally get back Roberts at the point in time where I'm not sure it's such a good thing. Perhaps Roberts will be DHing a good amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty strikes me as being very similar to Chris Davis. They're both roughly the same size (Davis seems to have about 20 lbs of muscle over Flaherty). They're currently using very similar batting stances and swings. Flaherty has a lot of natural power he hasn't harnessed yet. I'm not saying he's going to go 60 homeruns crazy like Davis, but he hasn't come close to reaching his full potential. He seems to be a late bloomer and I think it would be a mistake to take him out of the lineup at this point.

And given his demonstrated ability to play infield and outfield with solid defense, he could be our own Ben Zobrist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.724 OPS in 21 G since his recall.

.814 OPS in his last 10 G.

This guy needs to stop being treated like he is absolute dogsh*t.

Ryan Flaherty agrees with you. :)
Like I've said, Ryan always looks out for a brother. He's a stand-up guy.

Flaherty never had a thread with a poll for a facetious/degrading nickname for him as did Tommy Hunter, but I understood what you meant. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he struck out looking early in the game, but his batting eye seems to have improved a ton. He isn't chasing all that breaking junk in the dirt and/or outside the zone like in the past. I'm too lazy to look it up, but I'm sure his surge correlates to a big drop in strikeouts.

Quote from Roch:

"I've been getting into better counts and I've been positioning myself to have some more success," he said. "I've been laying off some pitches that I might have been swinging at before. It's just trying to slow the game down. Once you do that, the recipe for success is more in your favor.

"Really, it's just looking for a pitch that's hittable and not swing at anything down in the dirt. That's been my main approach since coming back, is putting myself in better hitting counts, and that's been a recipe for success."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty strikes me as being very similar to Chris Davis. They're both roughly the same size (Davis seems to have about 20 lbs of muscle over Flaherty). They're currently using very similar batting stances and swings. Flaherty has a lot of natural power he hasn't harnessed yet. I'm not saying he's going to go 60 homeruns crazy like Davis, but he hasn't come close to reaching his full potential. He seems to be a late bloomer and I think it would be a mistake to take him out of the lineup at this point.

And given his demonstrated ability to play infield and outfield with solid defense, he could be our own Ben Zobrist.

I also saw some similarities with the Chris Davis case: http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/131503-Opportunity-knocks-for-Ryan-Flaherty?p=3106544#post3106544

I definitely agree, Ryan seems to me your typical late bloomer. I don't know if Chris Davis was as much a late bloomer as he was a guy who just needed a long, consistent chance for his potential to come out.

Dunno about the Ben Zobrist comp., though, as Ryan will never have those kind of OBP skills, IMO. But I know what you mean. He could certainly have a plus bat at the position if we continue to let him develop and get comfortable with ML pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think we’ve all noticed that more calls have gone against the O’s than for them in the last few years.  It was only the Alomar part of your thesis that made me shake my head.   
    • But when that LHB is a Ced in a terrible slump, does that really matter?  Anyone could have done what he did, regardless of handedness, time in league or past track record.   Letting him try to hit was a bad decision.
    • I will be surprised if Baumann gets claimed.  I think he will be in AAA and that was part of the calculus for the move. 
    • Glad I'm not imagining things in regard to it being worse for us in recent years.  I don't recall thinking the umpiring was this bad, say, 10 years ago...but then again, there also didn't seem to be a better solution on the horizon. MLB should want robot umps for a few reasons...first, they should want accurate strike calls, that's just obvious.  Two, it's not a secret that MLB wants offense and they've been looking for ways to create offense ever since they stopped looking the other way on PEDs in the late 90s, early 2000s.   I have to believe that if pitchers aren't getting calls on pitches that are off the strike zone that a few things will happen; walks will increase because a pitcher won't be able to try to paint a corner too often.  They'll run the risk of throwing more balls, and as a result they'll put more over the plate for hitters to swing at.  Batters can feel more confident about taking a ball off the plate because they won't be afraid that an umpire will call it a strike. More pitches in the zone,  more swings, perhaps more offense, MLB should want that....maybe that's just really simplistic thinking but it seems fairly logical to me.  I also can't believe MLB wants the bat taken out of a superstar's hands in a crucial moment because an umpire missed a strike call or two, that's just not good for the game.  You've gotta wonder what the outcomes of some games would be if pitchers aren't getting strike calls because the umpiring is so awful. Unfortunately, it's not as easy as getting rid of the umpires and installing the robots.  The umpires are unionized, they'll strike, whatever.  I wouldn't blame them for doing that, either.   But something's gotta give.  It's my hope that by 2030 there's a solution to this issue and that there's a defined strike zone for batters and that umpires can still have a place in the game, even if it's not as much from behind home plate calling balls and strikes.  
    • Mullins has options, for what it's worth. I doubt they would send Cedric down, but Johnson could take Stowers' spot and move Cedric to more of a bench role.
    • Big night.  I did see something funny.  He tried to throw someone out at the plate from fairly shallow RF and air mailed it into the stands.  Never seen that before.  I assume there is some type of screen he would have had to clear to do it.
    • That's a number that college football players at skill positions can hit regularly so I can buy it.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...