Jump to content

Heyman: Source says O's are "tapped out".


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Where did you see 500k? His contract is around 2M for the year and he about half way through that contract.

The Orioles are only picking up his prorated salary, which is about 500k remaining.

EDIT: It's actually closer to 750k.

Still hardly adding a ton of salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles are only picking up his prorated salary, which is about 500k remaining.

EDIT: It's actually closer to 750k.

Still hardly adding a ton of salary.

Nick Delmonico was paid 1.6 million. He was probably worth that. He was sold in the deal. I did say money and assets. In business, you have to look at both as a cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Delmonico was paid 1.6 million. He was probably worth that. He was sold in the deal. I did say money and assets. In business, you have to look at both as a cost.

I don't think that's how Heyman or his source were looking at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that's how Heyman or his source were looking at it.

I am sure they were not. But just because an investment was made 24 months ago, it is still a corporate asset. And now it was spent on a rental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure they were not. But just because an investment was made 24 mouths ago, it is still a corporate asset. And now it was spent on a rental.

I'm not arguing with that at all. I understand completely. I just don't see how it "proves Jon wrong". I think he and the person he quoted were speculating on major league payroll additions. Adding Francisco Rodriguez does not refute their stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing with that at all. I understand completely. I just don't see how it "proves Jon wrong". I think he and the person he quoted were speculating on major league payroll additions. Adding Francisco Rodriguez does not refute their stance.

Ok. I do see that you are specifically meaning payroll obligations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing with that at all. I understand completely. I just don't see how it "proves Jon wrong". I think he and the person he quoted were speculating on major league payroll additions. Adding Francisco Rodriguez does not refute their stance.

And I do think that any major financial addition to the payroll will be offset in some manner. Peter is not likely taking on a 20 million dollar underperforming contract to help with the stretch run. So on that, I agree with his source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles are only picking up his prorated salary, which is about 500k remaining.

EDIT: It's actually closer to 750k.

Still hardly adding a ton of salary.

I think its closer to 1m. He signed a 2M if called to the majors and he was not called up until May 17th. If the money is spread over the rest the of season, that is close to 1m left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its closer to 1m. He signed a 2M if called to the majors and he was not called up until May 17th. If the money is spread over the rest the of season, that is close to 1m left.

Perhaps, I'm not sure how they prorate contracts like that. Regardless, it's not significant enough to refute that the O's are not adding much from where they are now. That was the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the KRod deal is flimsy evidence that PA is ready, willing and able to tap into the perceived war chest.

Check my posting history and you'll see that I've never beaten the "MASN Money" drum, but this deal proves nothing to either side of that debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...