Jump to content

Schoop over Flaherty?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

The person being left out of this conversation, that may be sent down when Manny comes back is Lombardozzi. Don't get me wrong I like him. He's shown a decent bat from the left side and defensive versatility. However, I have concerns about his arm. It doesn't look particularly strong. He's had difficulty making the turn on double plays and has struggled.on several throws.
Does he have options? Who would you rather have as your UTL: him or Flaherty? Do you platoon Flaherty and Schoop? Do you give Manny some extra days off to get back? Who would you rather play everyday at AAA? Who needs the regular reps?

Lombardozzi has all three options remaining, as do Flaherty and Schoop. Plenty of flexibility there.

I agree there are some issues with Lombo's arm. The reason I like him in combination with Schoop is that Schoop can handle SS or 3B when the need arises, and Lombo's arm is only a minor issue at 2B. I'd rather have Flaherty for defense, but I like Lombo's approach at the plate much better, and I'm really impressed with his baserunning. I'd much rather use Lombo late in a game to pinch run, or hit in a situation where moving a runner up a base was an important consideration. Flaherty has more pop but he doesn't reliably get his bat on the ball. I just think the Schoop/Lombo combo gives us the best combination of skills as a tandem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Lombardozzi has all three options remaining, as do Flaherty and Schoop. Plenty of flexibility there.

I agree there are some issues with Lombo's arm. The reason I like him in combination with Schoop is that Schoop can handle SS or 3B when the need arises, and Lombo's arm is only a minor issue at 2B. I'd rather have Flaherty for defense, but I like Lombo's approach at the plate much better, and I'm really impressed with his baserunning. I'd much rather use Lombo late in a game to pinch run, or hit in a situation where moving a runner up a base was an important consideration. Flaherty has more pop but he doesn't reliably get his bat on the ball. I just think the Schoop/Lombo combo gives us the best combination of skills as a tandem.

They didn't burn one with Flaherty last season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lombardozzi has all three options remaining, as do Flaherty and Schoop. Plenty of flexibility there.

I agree there are some issues with Lombo's arm. The reason I like him in combination with Schoop is that Schoop can handle SS or 3B when the need arises, and Lombo's arm is only a minor issue at 2B. I'd rather have Flaherty for defense, but I like Lombo's approach at the plate much better, and I'm really impressed with his baserunning. I'd much rather use Lombo late in a game to pinch run, or hit in a situation where moving a runner up a base was an important consideration. Flaherty has more pop but he doesn't reliably get his bat on the ball. I just think the Schoop/Lombo combo gives us the best combination of skills as a tandem.

Lombo's arm issues are obviously more of a concern for me then you. The Holt play last night should have been routine. However, I agree that he provides an offensive dimension that the team lacks, a contact hitter with some speed. Flaherty is clearly the better fielder IMO. It's a hard call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lombo's arm issues are obviously more of a concern for me then you. The Holt play last night should have been routine. However, I agree that he provides an offensive dimension that the team lacks, a contact hitter with some speed. Flaherty is clearly the better fielder IMO. It's a hard call.

Can you describe the Holt play? I didn't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Hardy is willing to trade positions with Manny, sign him. Otherwise, an infield of Schoop 3B, Machado SS, and Flaherty/Lombo platoon 2B would be fine. Use the money that would be spent on JJ to help sign bigger fish like Davis and Manny. Can't keep 'em all. Middle infielders entering age 32 season are too big a risk for a team that needs every big signing to work out.

JJ would probably be at 2B if they move him off SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lombo's arm issues are obviously more of a concern for me then you. The Holt play last night should have been routine. However, I agree that he provides an offensive dimension that the team lacks, a contact hitter with some speed. Flaherty is clearly the better fielder IMO. It's a hard call.

Did Lombardozzi injure his harm? He played 23 games in the OF and 41 games the season before. If he hasn't hurt his arm I think any claim that his arm isn't strong enough to play 2nd is reaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JJ would probably be at 2B if they move him off SS.

That would make no sense at all. Shortstops move to 3B as they age, not 2B, because they have to cover less ground that way and still take advantage of their great arm. At 2B you still have to cover a lot of ground, plus, you have to throw across the body, which is like teaching an old dog a new trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Lombardozzi injure his harm? He played 23 games in the OF and 41 games the season before. If he hasn't hurt his arm I think any claim that his arm isn't strong enough to play 2nd is reaching.

Well I suggest that you watch him make some plays and decide for yourself. He struggles making the turn on the DP and he looks awkward on what appear to be routine plays. He may have a sore arm. I don't know. Playing a position doesn't mean you have all of the requisite skills. Nate McClouth played a lot of left field for us last year but I don't think anyone here would argue he has a good arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holt hit a fairly slow ground ball to second that required SL to charge it and make a quick throw to first. Holt beat out a mediocre throw.

Slade has this to say in his report on Lombardozzi

natural running speed is average but plays up on the basepaths due to aggressive and skilled baserunning. Steve has often been described as an excellent fundamental defender that is very "headsy" in the field and will make all the routine plays and throws expected of him at second and third.

http://www.orioleshangout.com/article/4553/player-profile-steve-lombardozzi---utl

I guess I tend to take Slades word over your casual observations. No disrespect intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think Buck will keep Schoop up over Lombo and Flaherty - IF he thinks Schoop gives him the best chance to win games. I don't think Buck sees the O's as a good place for overly raw talent to mature.

All that said, Schoop is the best hitter of the three already - and will probably be the far better hitter. And he has looked promising at third base also.

I don't think Schoop is the odd man out if he keeps playing like he is... Why not keep him up and if he struggles for a month or two, then send him down and bring up whoever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slade has this to say in his report on Lombardozzi

http://www.orioleshangout.com/article/4553/player-profile-steve-lombardozzi---utl

I guess I tend to take Slades word over your casual observations. No disrespect intended.

Have you watched him play second base? If you have and like what you see that's all that matters. However, I would disagree. Just to clarify. I like Lombardozzi. He brings a dimension to the team that is lacking. He makes contact and runs well. In comparing him to Flaherty, I don't think he is as good defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you watched him play second base? If you have and like what you see that's all that matters. However, I would disagree. Just to clarify. I like Lombardozzi. He brings a dimension to the team that is lacking. He makes contact and runs well. In comparing him to Flaherty, I don't think he is as good defensively.

We need a hybrid of Flaherty's defense and Lombardozzi's offense: Flambardozzi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 27,299 for today’s matinee, so 96,612 for the four game set.  Will do my part by heading to the Yard next Friday for the first time this season - can’t wait! 
    • This was an interesting and in-depth reply from MLBTraderumors.   Q: Mason Miller and Lucas Erceg are amazing, and totally wasted on the A’s right now, despite them playing better than expected. But any trade would best be for solid prospects-SEVERAL solid prospects- who are 2-3 seasons away instead of MLB-ready guys who would also be wasted on the current and near-future teams. Given that, what team has those far away prospects to pay for one of those splendid slingers? A: This brings up a philosophical question: should bad teams have nice things?  Mason Miller provides a reason to watch the A’s, and his season has been insane so far.  And while he’s under team control through the 2029 season, we can’t count on him to hold up or on this franchise to be willing to pay him those last few years if he does. So the cold-hearted logical answer is for the A’s to trade Miller as soon as possible, as he might be at peak value and could be a lot less valuable the next time this organization has a realistic shot at contending.  (I am aware that the A’s are not awful so far this year at 15-17, but I do not think they have a realistic chance at making the playoffs anytime soon). It’s worth considering that Miller was a starter in college and all through the minors.  He came down with a “mild UCL sprain” in mid-May of last year, which involved a four-month recovery period and short appearances when he returned in September. A’s GM David Forst explained to MLB.com’s Martin Gallegos last Decemberthat he’d like to see Miller stay healthy for a year as a reliever before the team considers moving him back into a starting role.  When a pitcher excels as a closer to the degree Miller has thus far, it’s often hard to get him out of that role, but if he can eventually transition back to starting, he could theoretically be even more valuable.  But given last year’s UCL sprain and the attrition rate of the game’s hardest throwers, there’s a pretty good case that Miller is indeed at peak value right now. I don’t know where the hell the A’s are going to be (as an organization) in 2026, when Miller will receive his first arbitration salary. Given the extra uncertainty around the franchise these next few years, Phillip’s case makes some sense: trade Miller (and/or Erceg) now for prospects who are several years away from the Majors. The problem with this idea is that a prospect’s uncertainty is higher the further away he is from the Majors.  Trading Miller this summer might require threading the following needles: The other team is very much in win-now mode The headline prospects you get back should be position players, since this is about mitigating risk The headline prospects you get back should perhaps be in Double-A: close enough to the Majors to have some certainty, but far enough away where you could wait at least a year to promote them So, top-ranked Double-A position player prospects on win-now somewhat likely (40% or better chance) playoff teams: Samuel Basallo, Orioles catcher Chase DeLauter, Guardians outfielder Cole Young, Mariners infielder Harry Ford, Mariners catcher Emmanuel Rodriguez, Twins outfielder Matt Shaw, Cubs infielder Kevin Alcántara, Cubs outfielder James Triantos, Cubs second baseman Dalton Rushing, Dodgers catcher/DH Spencer Jones, Yankees outfielder Jacob Melton, Astros outfielder A lot of these teams are able to assemble good bullpens without giving up top prospects, and therefore might not be in the Miller bidding.  The Cubs, though, are a good example of a team with the type of prospect that it could make sense to flip for Miller.  It all might be too cute, though – maybe just enjoy Miller where he is now.  It’s also worth keeping in mind that the A’s have not exactly hit home runs in trying to convert established good players like Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Chris Bassitt, and Sean Manaea into prospects.  
    • Anyone catching the game on MLB TV tonight?  I’ll probably have it on given the relative lack of other baseball options this evening. 
    • Bradish was great but yeah I vote for the Yankees infield. LOL. 
    • Agree fully but good luck re the overreactions on this site (or any site, in fairness). 
    • 18 SB at the end of April is pretty amazing. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...