Jump to content

Olney On Qualifying Offer Candidates


Greg

Recommended Posts

In his latest Insider-only blog, ESPN?s Buster Olney runs down a list of pending free agents that are candidates to receive qualifying offers. Olney spoke with several executives from around the league and is of the mind that James Shields, Max Scherzer, Pablo Sandoval, Melky Cabrera, Russell Martin, Nelson Cruz, J.J. Hardy, Victor Martinez, Ervin Santana, David Robertson and Hanley Ramirez will receive qualifying offers, which should fall between $15MM and $15.5MM.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/09/olney-on-qualifying-offer-candidates.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Is markakis excluded from this analysis due to having a team option? That is, only true FAs were considered?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not sure, but I don't think Nick is worth a qualifying offer. If they do that, they might as well just pick up the option since he has a 2M buyout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see how the O's can expect to be any good next year without JJ Hardy at SS. You don't know what Manny is capable of over there or if he can even stay healthy and no one else in the system capable of handling SS.

I think they have a very good idea of what Manny is capable of over there. He played 203 games over there in the minors and they should have some small ability to translate his play at third in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see how the O's can expect to be any good next year without JJ Hardy at SS. You don't know what Manny is capable of over there or if he can even stay healthy and no one else in the system capable of handling SS.
I think they have a very good idea of what Manny is capable of over there. He played 203 games over there in the minors and they should have some small ability to translate his play at third in the majors.

Manny may not be ready for spring training even. Nothing is certain there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ignores the idea that they let him walk should be turn it down and receive a comp pick.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can't see his agent turning it down. Nick's value has plummeted the past few years. I would still like to see them on a new deal. Something like a 2/22 deal wouldn't be too bad. That's more along the lines of his value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They know what he did in the minor leagues more than two years ago at age 20 prior to two knee surgeries. That sounds reliable!

Do you really think that is all they have to go on?

They know what his lateral range is, they know his arm, they know about his ability to come in on and go out for the ball.

You don't think that someone has produced a very advanced report showing how Manny's performance at third would translate to short?

You think that little of the front office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
Do you really think that is all they have to go on?

They know what his lateral range is, they know his arm, they know about his ability to come in on and go out for the ball.

You don't think that someone has produced a very advanced report showing how Manny's performance at third would translate to short?

You think that little of the front office?

But how would that translate into what he can do post surgeries on each knee. Plus, I just have not seen anything that leads me to believe (yet) that Manny will stay off the DL for a full season. Hardy is THE anchor, let alone the only real constant, of the infield. I would still go three years even with the risk of doing so provides. Sign JJ and spend time taking care of something else this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how would that translate into what he can do post surgeries on each knee. Plus, I just have not seen anything that leads me to believe (yet) that Manny will stay off the DL for a full season. Hardy is THE anchor, let alone the only real constant, of the infield. I would still go three years even with the risk of doing so provides. Sign JJ and spend time taking care of something else this winter.

Right, because Hardy hasn't been fighting back and shoulder issues this season.

Manny had pretty much the same surgery this season that he had last season. Odds are pretty good that the after-effects are going to be really similar.

This isn't Matt with his elbow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my take.

They said they would only consider moving Manny, if they got him reps during ST, not fair to move him during the regular season, and those are words directly from Buck.

Manny may not be ready to go by ST, or even opening day.

IMO

I would leave Manny at third for 2015.

Just my own opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...