Jump to content

Orioles Discussing Four-Year Deal With Nick Markakis (Signs w/ATL)


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles Discussing Four-Year Deal With Nick*Markakis <a href="http://t.co/Dh6l1difFe">http://t.co/Dh6l1difFe</a></p>— MLB Trade Rumors (@mlbtraderumors) <a href="

">November 2, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

What a mistake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I hope this is not true. I like Nick, but this is more than the Orioles should have to go to get him under contract

The O's anted up last time and gave Nick a very fair deal. This time they need to realize they have the upper hand and if they bring him back, do it in as team friendly a way as possible.

That isn't a four year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm against a four-year deal in principle, but it depends on the dollars. I'd rather sign Nick for 4/$36 mm than 3/$33 mm, for example.

I'd rather go 3/33. It would be different if he didn't have trade protection. I don't know if I can see the O's cutting him or him retiring if his skills crater by year four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but think Angelos is telling Duquette what to do if he signs him to a 4 a year contract. I cant' see Dan doing this on his own.

Man, it sure is disappointing. I feel like they'll end up bringing back Markakis for a pretty penny, and then use that as an excuse why they couldn't sign Cruz or Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, not a lot of love for Nick around these parts. I know he isn't a superstar but he is not a bad guy to have on your team and he is a Buck type of player which you can't quantify. Obviously I'm hoping for a home town discount for more years but it's not that bad of a situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys really need to loosen up and take a chill pill you know it. A four year deal to Nick Markakis is not going to hurt the Orioles. Nick could play first base or DH in worst case scenario. The Orioles can't afford to lose Nick and Nelson Cruz. You have to lock up Nick because the chances of resigning Nelson Cruz are not that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Do you actually the MLB postseason?  Most teams get their starters out by the 6th inning.
    • The whole “the key with Crochet” is exactly why trading for him makes no sense. On top of that, how does he bounce back next year after throwing so many more innings than he ever has? Im not questioning his talent, his upside, age, service time or anything.  It’s all on the side of the team that has him. But they are going to want multiple top 50 type prospects for a guy with ace potential and a lot of service time.  His name shouldn’t even be mentioned imo.
    • Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length. The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups. But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.
    • What do the Rangers do at the deadline? Do they just stand pat and hope next year goes better?
    • I don’t think he’s worth Holliday/Mayo/Basallo level just because of the injury/innings limit concerns, but he’s pitching this year like one of the best SP in baseball and has 2.5 years of control (which will be cheap years in arb, considering he’s gone through once at just over league min).  The key with Crochet is he has to still be starting in the playoffs to get full value from him then. That means either you let him keep rolling and hope the innings don’t catch up, or you do load management by some combination of skipping starts, pitch count limits and/or shifting him to the pen. I could see a team using Crochet as a RP until September and then stretching him back out before the playoffs when you have expanded rosters to help bridge the innings during the initial shorter starts. But it’d be pretty wild to see a team pay what it’s going to take for him to then immediately shelf him like that. 
    • This has been discussed a ton over the years.  It hasn’t been many but there have been a few. Jared Weaver was one. Searching through here or on google will give you the info.     But none of that matters imo. He’s not turning down that contract.  There is nothing but upside for him with that type of deal.  Now, maybe instead of 7 guaranteed years, we now get 6 (ie, we didn’t sign him to the deal before this season started, so that’s one less guaranteed year on the deal) but he’s not turning it down. 
    • Zero chance he turns it down.  The money in that deal is essentially his best case scenario. Zippy chance.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...