Jump to content

Is it all a mirage?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

As the O's climb to 3 over .500, two back of the Rays, I have to question if the surge is real or just a product of the schedule.

In June the O's have played many games vs losing teams. Cleveland, Boston and the Phillies have accounted for 9 of the 16 games so far and they have 7 more against these teams this month.

I am not complaining. Its nice to win. But I do have to wonder if the surge in offense is because the O's are getting better or is it because the pitchers they are facing are subpar?

Probably a little bit of both is true. I guess we won't really know how good the O's are until July when the O's play 19 of their 25 games vs teams with winning records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt the schedule has helped us. But part of being a winning team is dominating the bad teams. I'm glad we've done that this month, and built some momentum and confidence that hopefully will help when the schedule gets tougher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the O's climb to 3 over .500, two back of the Rays, I have to question if the surge is real or just a product of the schedule.

In June the O's have played many games vs losing teams. Cleveland, Boston and the Phillies have accounted for 9 of the 16 games so far and they have 7 more against these teams this month.

I am not complaining. Its nice to win. But I do have to wonder if the surge in offense is because the O's are getting better or is it because the pitchers they are facing are subpar?

Probably a little bit of both is true. I guess we won't really know how good the O's are until July when the O's play 19 of their 25 games vs teams with winning records.

You did selectively leave out the Yankees, whom we dominated for two games and very well could have swept if we didn't rely on Matusz on game 3. We won't be tested by really good pitching for awhile so it will be hard to say at least about the rejuvenated offense. I'm concerned more about the pitching, especially against Toronto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the season (not just for June), the team has the...

*3rd best OPS in the AL (5th most runs scored, 3rd most HRs)

*5th best ERA in the AL (bullpen ERA is 3rd, bullpen is averaging over a K per inning)

*the fewest errors in the AL (9th in the majors in defensive efficiency)

So while there will still be peaks and valleys, and it's too soon to really say just how good they are, I would lean away from it being a mirage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our W-L record, by team

BOS 7 3

CHW 2 1

CLE 2 1

HOU 3 4

LAA 1 2

MIA 1 2

NYM 0 2

NYY 5 5

PHI 3 0

SEA 2 1

TBR 5 4

TOR 3 6

Notably, we haven't played the Royals, Tigers, Twins, Rangers, Nats, Braves, or A's, all of whom remain on our schedule.

The Yankees, Rays and Jay haven't played the Phillies yet. The Yankees play them next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they lost 2/3 to Miami people like Roy Firestone were on here complaining that they weren't "getting fat" against "bad teams." I'm always annoyed by comments like that, number 1 because there was a time not that long ago where the Orioles fit that description, and number two because this isn't football, good teams lose games and series to bad teams all the time. But now we go from we're supposed to beat "bad teams" to do we only look this good because we're beating "bad teams?" My view is, who cares. We just took 7/8 at home and five of those seven wins came against teams in our own division, including a team that's still ahead of us. Good record or bad record, really, what does it matter when you win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are never as good as you look when you are winning nor as bad as you look when you are losing.

In mid-May, I posted this:

If we are below .500 at the All Star Break, I will be worried. The schedule from now until then is pretty easy and I think we will right the ship.

Schedule stuff (mostly) evens out over time. The Orioles have played a tougher schedule to this point than the Rays and Red Sox and an easier schedule than the Yankees and Blue Jays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a mirage. Getting Wieters back was huge and Hardy is starting to look healthier. The outfield defense has improved and getting rid of De Aza and Cabrera was addition by subtraction. I don't think the offense is as good as they've been in June but I certainly don't think it as as bad as it was in April. I expect this team to win 84-88 games as it is currently constructed. Of course, if a couple guys get hot and play to their potential (ie Gausman) then this could be a 90 win team again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that we are fortunate to play the Phillies to start this week, however like most other sports teams and players find opportunities to get in rhythms and run with it.

If you ever watch basketball guys will shoot the ball during a dead ball or timeout just to get their rhythm, which is why opponents will go up to catch it, to not allow rhythm to be developed. In golf you might play a couple easy holes and get your swing adjusted.

We (the orioles) are currently in a spot that is letting them relax and work on parts of their swings. No offense to the phillies, it kind of seems like they're getting extra batting practice, but in a live sense.

So mirage no, fantastic momentum building opportunity, yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You did selectively leave out the Yankees, whom we dominated for two games and very well could have swept if we didn't rely on Matusz on game 3. We won't be tested by really good pitching for awhile so it will be hard to say at least about the rejuvenated offense. I'm concerned more about the pitching, especially against Toronto

If didn't selective leave out anything. I said the O's have played losing teams in 9 of 16 games in June. If you can count you know that the O's have played teams with winning records in 7 games in June.

I was just pointing out that at this point in the season the O's winning is aided by the schedule. Therefore, how much the addition of Wieters, Hardy, Reimold and Parmelee has improved the team will not be known until the O's play some winning teams in July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a mirage. Getting Wieters back was huge and Hardy is starting to look healthier. The outfield defense has improved and getting rid of De Aza and Cabrera was addition by subtraction. I don't think the offense is as good as they've been in June but I certainly don't think it as as bad as it was in April. I expect this team to win 84-88 games as it is currently constructed. Of course, if a couple guys get hot and play to their potential (ie Gausman) then this could be a 90 win team again.

Awesome post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I hope not. It's not like we're 10 games over .500 here. We're 3 games over, that's certainly still not as good as this team is supposed to be.

Nor, was this team as bad as their record was.

Like some of us have been saying, this season was similar to last season, last season they didnt come out of the gate strong.

They had injuries and finally mid June, they caught fire and well, we know the history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I hope not. It's not like we're 10 games over .500 here. We're 3 games over, that's certainly still not as good as this team is supposed to be.

It is still an 85 win pace. I thought they were an 86-90 win team, so not far off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I disagree, I think Lamar has a ton of baggage that is preventing someone from going all in on him. Injuries, missed games due to illness, limited passing, heavily reliant on his wheels which will almost certainly decline sooner rather than later, not having an agent - he’s clearly stubborn ( imagine need to rework his deal to make cap room). It’s obvious there are plenty of red flags that are quite frankly more than obvious.    Believe me … I wish somebody would step up. I’m ready to move on!
    • While I don’t think Santander is a great or even good outfielder, I think some of this is a little much. The Hays/Santander switch implies that LF at Fenway is easy to play, which I don’t agree with. It certainly has less ground to cover for sure, but it’s a gimmicky spot that is a little tricky. Plus it was 36 and windy. Now with that I will say 2 things:  1. Would have rather seen Stowers get the start. 2. Definitely would have liked McKenna to be out there in the 8th.
    • I guess my question would be this: what is the level of production he would have to have to make it okay for Westburg/Ortiz to stay down? Does this production even exist? I am also assuming with this question that those 2 are producing in AAA.
    • Here is   the issues the MSA is running into with the stadium improvement financing. *As of March 13, 2023, project is cancelled. Project will rebid but no definite date yet.** https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/news/2023/03/07/baltimore-ravens-stadium-upgrades-financing.html After promising the Baltimore Ravens up to $600 million worth of upgrades to their stadium if the team resigned its lease, the Maryland Stadium Authority is now exploring how to finance those renovations amid a difficult economic environment. Chief Financial Officer David Raith told the Stadium Authority’s board on Tuesday that the agency won’t be able to finance $435 million in planned improvements to M&T Bank Stadium with only tax-exempt bonds and is seeking the OK to find a bank loan or other financing to pay for up to $200 million of the project costs. Financing updates to the Baltimore Ravens stadium primarily using tax-exempt bonds, a cheaper option, won’t work because those types of bonds have to be spent in a three-year period. If the money is not spent in three years, Raith said the authority would be at risk of being penalized by the Internal Revenue Service. “I knew there was no way we could spend $600 million in three years,” Raith told the Baltimore Business Journal after the meeting. Raith wants to split the $435 million cost into two methods of financing — $235 million in tax-exempt revenue bonds and $200 million in taxable financing. That money could be raised through a letter of credit, a taxable bond deal or a bank loan. Acquiring taxable debt will be costly as Raith predicted the $200 million in taxable financing would have an interest rate of 5.6%, compared to 3.6% for the tax-exempt bonds. He said the agency would prefer a bank loan for the $200 million because the agency would not have to pay interest until it starts using the loan funds, which could save millions of dollars a year. But Raith said he first needs to see if there are any lenders interested in ponying up the money. “I just don’t know whether there is enough commitment from the banking community for something like that,” he said. The renovations are part of a plan by the state to incentivize both the Ravens and Orioles to stay put in Baltimore. The Maryland General Assembly last year passed House Bill 896, which allowed the stadium authority to borrow $1.2 billion in bonds to pay for improvements to both stadiums. The stadium improvement funds were used as a carrot to get the teams to sign long-term leases. Once the team signed a lease, it would then get access to $600 million. The Ravens in January signed a 15-year lease extension that keeps the team at M&T Bank Stadium until 2037. The signing of the lease started a one-year period for the stadium authority to get financing in place for planned upgrades to M&T Bank Stadium. The Ravens could not be reached for comment. To get all $435 million for renovations financed as quickly as possible, the stadium authority approved a measure on Tuesday allowing Raith to start exploring how he wants to secure the $200 million in taxable borrowing. But the authority also needs the Maryland General Assembly to pass legislation that would allow dual financing for the project. House Bill 524 introduced in Annapolis would create separate financing funds for both the Ravens and Orioles project costs. The clock is ticking for Raith to secure this funding. He said a potential increase by the Federal Reserve of the federal interest rate could cost the authority and taxpayers millions more. “With rising interest rates, the [Maryland Stadium Authority] is trying to get to market as soon as possible to get the best interest rates and generate as much money as possible to ensure we can complete the projects,” Raith said. Unlike the Ravens, the Orioles have yet to sign a lease. The Orioles' lease is up at the end of 2023 and Raith said if the Orioles sign a long-term lease the stadium authority would have to repeat this process again. Raith said he was surprised that the Ravens lease agreement happened first because the team's deal still had five years left on it. “I don’t think anyone expected that the Ravens would be the first ones to the plate because the Orioles' lease was the one that really was a top priority,” Raith said
    • Someone should ask him about maybe having the highest prices for beer of any team? This is at the new market stores. 16oz beers are $10.99 for domestic and $12.49 for craft, hard, seltzers, or imported beers. 24oz beers are $14.99 for domestic and $15.75 for imports or hard seltzers. 12oz canned cocktails are $12.99.
    • I would say "stunning".... but is it, really?
    • Don't like this answer either.He is going to do Baltimore a favor and give them a gift. Don't trust him. Plus the Ravens stadium improvement money may not all come from bonds and maybe have to partially pay it off with a bank loan. As the MSA said the longer you wait on the financing, the more it will cost the taxpayers. I have heard the longer you wait and with interest rates rising the State is not sure the Orioke improvements can all be done with public funds.   The Orioles will play their first home game next Thursday, and Gov. Wes Moore and his children will throw out the first pitch. The Orioles’ current lease with the state of Maryland, its landlord, expires at the end of the year. Angelos has said that he hopes signing a long-term lease can be an “All-Star break gift,” meaning the deal would be done by early July. He didn’t provide an update on timing Thursday when asked, but said “we’re going to come through” when it comes to the lease. “There’s no question about it,” he said.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...