Jump to content

Only 2 WJZ Broadcasts left...


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

What if a person doesn't want to pay for cable because they rarely watch TV except for Orioles games and occasional sporting events and when they try to pay for MLB.TV, they find out all games are blacked out in the local area. What do they do?

You would want to consider VPN in that case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
But it blacks out Orioles games for people who live in their terrirory, right? So I'd have to buy a VPN to spoof my IP address. Harumph, too much hassle. Plus MLB.com is so expensive that I may as well get cable added to my verizon package.

$130 or so for a full year of mlb.tv to watch every team, live or on demand, with choice of broadcasting team or radio announcers, on the laptop screen you want...that's so expensive? Sure, you need a reliable VPN, but come on. If the solution is right within your grasp and you still harumph it, then there's nothing anyone can say or do to help you because you've already made the choice to simply be obstinate about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthermore, MASN doesn't seem to have any plans to stream their broadcasts to cable subscribers like most other networks currently do. 90% of my TV watching is done on laptops. Who wants to sit on their reear and watch tv on a stationary screen anymore? If MASN refuses to join the 21st century and stream their broadcast to cable subscribers like HBO, USA, TNT, TBS, and most of the other cable networks, I don't see why I should give them a dime of my money.

With all due respect, this is your choice. But then don't bemoan the fact that you can't watch Orioles games. Every game is provided in crystal clear HD for anyone to see. If you choose not to pay for television service, that's your choice.

I personally hate when WJZ shows the Orioles games. Its typically a Sunday afternoon when I want to flip to golf between Orioles commercials, and instead I have the same Orioles game on two stations. Now THAT is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, this is your choice. But then don't bemoan the fact that you can't watch Orioles games. Every game is provided in crystal clear HD for anyone to see. If you choose not to pay for television service, that's your choice.

I personally hate when WJZ shows the Orioles games. Its typically a Sunday afternoon when I want to flip to golf between Orioles commercials, and instead I have the same Orioles game on two stations. Now THAT is ridiculous.

I second this...there are many options for watching every Oriole game. That would be my ONE consideration when making viewing decisions since I watch only the Orioles, The Walking Dead, and the Big Bang Theory - as well as college basketball and the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a linky... to any game any sport any day. If any one wants it. :D

Some guy I know <cough, cough> has tried some of those linkys for Ravens games, since he is out of the viewing area. All of the linkys that he has found are really terrible quality. That guy <cough, cough> is considering DirecTV internet and VPN to get around the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? This is 2015. Pay for cable or expect not to see the O's. The decision to not pay for cable should have included access to O's games...
Harsh, but the honest truth.
What if a person doesn't want to pay for cable because they rarely watch TV except for Orioles games and occasional sporting events and when they try to pay for MLB.TV, they find out all games are blacked out in the local area. What do they do?
Furthermore, MASN doesn't seem to have any plans to stream their broadcasts to cable subscribers like most other networks currently do. 90% of my TV watching is done on laptops. Who wants to sit on their reear and watch tv on a stationary screen anymore? If MASN refuses to join the 21st century and stream their broadcast to cable subscribers like HBO, USA, TNT, TBS, and most of the other cable networks, I don't see why I should give them a dime of my money.

Why would you think that MASN has any right to stream anything outside of the MLB Advanced Media Agreements? Feel free to bash anything you like but digital rights are something that will be enforced going forward. Part of being a citizen is working to pay for what you use. Including Orioles broadcasts.

I know we have a generation or two that has been used to media for free, but why would you think that would continue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you think that MASN has any right to stream anything outside of the MLB Advanced Media Agreements? Feel free to bash anything you like but digital rights are something that will be enforced going forward. Part of being a citizen is working to pay for what you use. Including Orioles broadcasts.

I know we have a generation or two that has been used to media for free, but why would you think that would continue?

I think that MLB has great digital media access to live games. Being an out-of-market fan, I am more than happy to pay for my MLB.tv subscription. My only complaint is that they black out games when Fox has their national broadcast.

Even though I hate those blackouts, I understand why they are there. Television contracts are a huge part of MLB's revenue. Those TV contracts would be significantly de-valued if you allowed unlimited internet access to the games. If there ever comes a point where MLB feels it can earn the same money from online subscriptions, then they will probably lift the blackouts.

Remember Super TV? You might be asking the same question about MASN one day if the blackouts get lifted. That means they are going to fight tooth and nail to keep those blackouts in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate the blackout.

I think that MLB has great digital media access to live games. Being an out-of-market fan, I am more than happy to pay for my MLB.tv subscription. My only complaint is that they black out games when Fox has their national broadcast.

Even though I hate those blackouts, I understand why they are there. Television contracts are a huge part of MLB's revenue. Those TV contracts would be significantly de-valued if you allowed unlimited internet access to the games. If there ever comes a point where MLB feels it can earn the same money from online subscriptions, then they will probably lift the blackouts.

Remember Super TV? You might be asking the same question about MASN one day if the blackouts get lifted. That means they are going to fight tooth and nail to keep those blackouts in place.

Oh, I do not defend any of that crap. I just know that MASN can't stream anything. At all. Even archives. They do not currently own those rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if a person doesn't want to pay for cable because they rarely watch TV except for Orioles games and occasional sporting events and when they try to pay for MLB.TV, they find out all games are blacked out in the local area. What do they do?

They keep their cable, that's what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate the blackout.

Oh, I do not defend any of that crap. I just know that MASN can't stream anything. At all. Even archives. They do not currently own those rights.

Really? It's MLB's product. They control the distribution of their product. TV is where the money is ... take away TV's exclusivity and you take away that money. I don't like it either, but I totally understand it.

Businesses aren't in business to lose money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB.TV is so far ahead of other sports broadcast approaches, its silly.

Where I live, I can also only listen to Nottingham Forest games on the radio, if I can't go to the game - and then it has to be on FM, as the digital streams are blacked-out (not just in this area, but across the country). Unless the game is live on national TV, there is no play-again, on demand option. I can watch highlights on the highlights show on a Saturday night on TV, or via the clubs website. But that re-cap is about the limit.

So here I am....3,500 miles away from Bmore, and I watch MLB.TV Premium on the Roku, which I have on every TV in the house. Should I want to watch on a laptop or tablet, I also get the other 'At Bat' stuff, live graphical stats, lineups, look-ins. And thats for every MLB team LIVE.

I can also play-again on-demand and re-watch any game played, with either home or away video/radio streams. The other day I hit a button on the remote by accident and realised that this function stretches back to the start of the 2013 season!

In addition to all that, I can watch (on laptop or tablet) minor league games via the MiLB.TV app.

I know it sucks if you live locally and are subject to a black-out, but the quality of the coverage is SO good that if I lived in Maryland the first thing I would be doing is sorting out the VPN situation.

Finally, I understand the principles behind it, but is there any concrete evidence that having games available on live TV has a significant impact on game attendance? Just curious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I tend to agree that Hays should get the at bats over McKenna because he has better instincts and because Hays the track record of being a solid everyday player. That being said, he has truly been a below replacement level player for half a season with no signs of improvement this year. (He did have a good 90 PA stretch in August/sept of last year though) For me, Hays should get the at bats and McKenna should play a small role. I would send down HK because they are foolishly not playing him enough. That said, if Hays continues to be a liability for another 100-200 at bats, a real discussion has to occur on what to do with him and if he is relegated to a 4th/5th OFer role, I do think there’s a conversation to be had about who is better suited for that role..McKenna or Hays. But a lot of things need to happen before that discussion can really be had. I personally believe Hays will be fine and with Cowser now established, Hays won’t be playing everyday, which he never should have been doing in the first place.  That may help him a lot.
    • We agree to disagree my friend. Not sure about the following orders comment. That’s a bit strange but all good my friend. Miller is a special player for sure. That we can both agree on, alright? 
    • Really sorry to hear about that Frobby.  Especially the lost calls and voicemails.  When my Grandmother passed (who was like a second mother to me)... for a few weeks I called her cell phone and would talk to her voice mail.. it was somewhat soothing to me for whatever reason.  I got to briefly hear her voice and say things to what felt like her at the time of grieving.  After a month or so, they turned off the phone.  I then later found out she never knew how to get into her voicemail anyways haha. But yeah, I've been to Nats stadium 2 times and honestly, can't stand it.  There's isnt much to like about it and even metro is a disaster getting to and from at times.  I went to a Cubs game at Wrigley this past weekend and loved it and it wasn't even my team.  I can't imagine I'll be going to anymore games at Nats park.  
    • I got one of those low blood sugar got to have her veggie food wives also.  They are so annoying.  If I didnt get some other use out of her It would be too much.  LOL Why cant they just eat a hamburger once in a while?
    • I wish it would end because I'm tired of hearing about it. This team is good enough for it to go on a lot longer, too, so that makes it even worse.   Those are your words. Apologies for ribbing you a bit over the thing that you actually said.
    • We aren’t a year away from Those 2 joining the team.
    • First of all, I am not advocating (nor have I ever advocated) for a “Miller or bust approach”. Yet, I do recognize his special ability and I can envision him being a tremendous asset to this team. Second, to say Coloumbe has similar production as Miller is simply not true. Look at the WHIP, strikeouts per 9, ERA, hard contact, etc. They are not in the same class.  I’m not sure if you unintentionally devaluing Mullers K number, but they are astounding 2/3 of his outs are coming on K’s. That is an absolute gold mine of an asset when you get to extra innings with the ghost runner. Next, I can envision a tremendous competitive advantage that we would have next season or in future seasons when we would be able to pair Bautista and Miller. That is worth considering parting with one of our better but replaceable prospects. Last, I have never “clamored for him and him alone”. And as  far as your directive to turn my attention elsewhere, I’m probably not the best poster when it comes to following orders/commands…lol
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...