Jump to content

vs. PHILLIES, 2/28


scOtt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Now that is the Wright I am used to seeing.

Yep, this is history. His stuff is so inconsistent. He'll flash you good stuff then come back and that slider flattens out and he starts leaving them in the middle of the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Yep, this is history. His stuff is so inconsistent. He'll flash you good stuff then come back and that slider flattens out and he starts leaving them in the middle of the plate.

The single to left after the HR was smashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Yep, this is history. His stuff is so inconsistent. He'll flash you good stuff then come back and that slider flattens out and he starts leaving them in the middle of the plate.

I was hoping that a move to the bullpen, where he only had to worry about 1-2 innings at a time, would give his stuff a boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I was hoping that a move to the bullpen, where he only had to worry about 1-2 innings at a time, would give his stuff a boost.

I still think it might, but who knows? His breaking stuff is so inconsistent that it's hard to trust him from inning to inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

I still think it might, but who knows? His breaking stuff is so inconsistent that it's hard to trust him from inning to inning.

I don't see as many games as you guys do. The thing I remember about Wright is when it's close and late, and he's in a jam he gets that deer in the headlights look. You know he's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, scOtt said:

I don't see as many games as you guys do. The thing I remember about Wright is when it's close and late, and he's in a jam he gets that deer in the headlights look. You know he's done.

No, you are on it. Wright is not exactly known for his mound demeanor in tights spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree, he'd be a nice logical fit for us. 
    • Zach Eflin TB is a starter that would have game 2 or 3 potential. He’s owed $18 million next year in his last year. That’s pretty pricey for the Rays.  I’d put him up there with rentals Kikuchi and Severino as best fits. 
    • You do know that Gunnar is hitting .290? Rustchman .300? O'Hearn .283? Westburg .282? Mountcastle .276? Watch the games much?
    • @Filmstudy that you for the detail on why you don't believe that Robert is a good fit. I tend to agree. 1. Cedric is finally coming out of his funk. 2. (And I know you don't put much stock into what coaches and FO personnel say publicly based on your excellent Raven's content) But Elias just about stated outright yesterday during his media appearance in Norfolk that all of his interest in acquisitions would be as he called it "on the pitching side".  3. Our offense is already # 1 in the sport as is. However, our pitching has not been very good since we have been forced to go with Suarez, Irvin, and Povich as the #3, 4, 5 options. IMO that combo over a long stretch of time will put a serious strain on the bullpen AND you really would not your chances of defeating multiple teams in the playoffs with any of them getting starts in every round (some times in pivotal/possible elimination games). IMO pitching is the real need/where the weaknesses lie.  4. I just wanted to give a shout out for your devotion to the belief in platoons...lol... But if the O's did acquire Robert by some chance, there is literally less than a ZERO chance that he would be used as a platoon player.
    • It's a partially elastic collision, so the EV reduction is going to be a little less than the velocity reduction from a thrown baseball.   I also think that hitters would eventually adjust and there would be more hitters in the mold of Luis Arraez, that focus on hitting soft line drives with a 65 mph bat speed.  Either way the BABIP of a whiff is .000 so I think baseball is better served seeing more batted balls even if BABIP is slightly depressed due to a reduction in EV.  Launch angle is also a large component to BABIP and batters can still square the ball up to maximize their chances.  And since a heavier ball will move less, it should be easier to square it up.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...