Jump to content

Brian Roberts trade rumors back on!


ed101elove

Recommended Posts

If you're the Brewers...

Weeks for Roberts is plausible. They might give 3+ years of Weeks for 1+ year of Roberts if they felt the upgrade was significant enough.

Gamel/Laporta, Escobar and Jeffress for Sherrill and Burres... LOL. Not in a million years. Sherrill would certainly give the BP a shot in the arm, but the Brewers are loaded with serviceable #5 starters (Bush McClung Villanueva Capuano). Adding another of those does them no good.

So you're left with 3 of their top 5 or 6 prospects for Sherrill. Hey I'd love it if they did that, but... dream on.

At this point, I think Roberts is worth more than just Weeks though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And neither are you, so you have no idea what they would think about that trade. You are speculating as much as I am.

I'm speculating from the Brewers' point of view, though. Therein lies the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of getting younger but currently Weeks’ would be a huge down grade defensively, offensively and on the bases, what would we get besides younger? I think a better offer will come along in July.

As far as I can tell, the only thing that's in it for the O's is they get a couple extra years of service time (not that there isn't value there).

Upside notwithstanding, right now Roberts is better than Weeks virtually across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm speculating from the Brewers' point of view, though. Therein lies the difference.

But you don't know what their point of view is.

It is one thing to say tha tthe deal, while fair, doesn't go with the philosophy of the Brewers.

It is another thing to say the Brewers are getting ripped off...They aren't getting ripped off in the deal.

If they don't want to "go for it" this year, then the deal is pointless for them.

But if they do, BRob is a big upgrade over Weeks and Sherrill helps them out immensely...Now, Burres may do them no good and that's fine but it doesn't change much of the deal...Perhaps the 4th player does not have the upside of a guy like Jeffress but the main pieces(Weeks, Escobar and Gamel/Laporta) should stay the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would be very interesting is if the Brewers want all of DCab, Sherrill and BRob.

There are so many options with the Brewers right now...The one you could see the easiest for them is Sherrill because of his salary and service time but DCab and BRob make a lot of sense for them as well.

And if the Cards get in on BRob, the Brewers may be forced to pay a little more if they really want Roberts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you are just speculating. Anyone looking at their situation, needing to win this year and having a need for a lead-off hitter who gets on-base would value Roberts over Weeks. At some point the Brewers have to look past the future.

Stick to the Cubs.

This post was fine until you edited to add that pointless cheapshot at the end. Just stick to the topic and skip the personal attacks.

My opinion is that the Brewers would not pay much, if anything to go from 3+ years with Weeks to 1+ year with Roberts. That amount of service time is a pretty huge factor, especially for a team like the Brewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I know how sensitive you are and that you would never take a cheap shot.

Not to take any sides in this lil' debate, but it might be worth pointing out that Dave is the National League Board analyst, who happens to have a "specialty" with the Cubbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post was fine until you edited to add that pointless cheapshot at the end. Just stick to the topic and skip the personal attacks.

My opinion is that the Brewers would not pay much, if anything to go from 3+ years with Weeks to 1+ year with Roberts. That amount of service time is a pretty huge factor, especially for a team like the Brewers.

Dave, i am not saying you are wrong but how long are the Brewers going to sit around and wait for things to happen for them?

They have a lot of talent right now and can afford to move some pieces for a chance to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave, do the Cubs have a similar website, or do you just really like it here?:rolleyes:

I think this is a very important question that should not just be looked over. I think there are many on here that would like this answer. I am sure that there may even be a few that will help find one if there are none that are known currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave, i am not saying you are wrong but how long are the Brewers going to sit around and wait for things to happen for them?

They have a lot of talent right now and can afford to move some pieces for a chance to win.

You're taking *all* the pieces, though. Emptying the farm is something you do when there's a Miguel Cabrera or Danny Haren coming back, not a George Sherrill plus a lateral move at 2B.

They may indeed "go for it" but IMO they'd be much smarter about it than what you're laying out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like my title changed to American League Board analyst, since I watch so much American League baseball, with a "specialty with the O's.;)

I am guessing you'd have to take a number and get in line for this request (and a change in title). ;):)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're taking *all* the pieces, though. Emptying the farm is something you do when there's a Miguel Cabrera or Danny Haren coming back, not a George Sherrill plus a lateral move at 2B.

They may indeed "go for it" but IMO they'd be much smarter about it than what you're laying out here.

Lateral move? Come on...You just said in another thread that Roberts is better across the board than Weeks.

As of right now, BRob is probably worth 3-4 wins more than Weeks.

Sherrill helps them greatly.

And I am not taking all of their pieces...Escobar is blocked by Hardy and they apparently have another SS prospect that Crawdad mentioned....Gamel is likely to be moved off of 3rd but they obviously can't go to first with Fielder there...Laporta has similar issues.

Weeks would obviously not be needed if BRob is there.

So, really we are talking about taking 2-3 prospects and their current everyday disappointing second baseman.

That is hardly everything especially since they apparently also have some other CI prospects that have been mentioned in this thread.

Sounds to me like the Brewers have built a very strong and deep farm system, especially in terms of position prospects and they already have a lot of young guys on the team now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Tell you what, if it was McKenna there’d be a ten page thread on it. But since we’re still in Cowser’s honeymoon phase, it’ll slide. 
    • No.  I just like making fun of CoC from time to time. 
    • 27,299 for today’s matinee, so 96,612 for the four game set.  Will do my part by heading to the Yard next Friday for the first time this season - can’t wait! 
    • This was an interesting and in-depth reply from MLBTraderumors.   Q: Mason Miller and Lucas Erceg are amazing, and totally wasted on the A’s right now, despite them playing better than expected. But any trade would best be for solid prospects-SEVERAL solid prospects- who are 2-3 seasons away instead of MLB-ready guys who would also be wasted on the current and near-future teams. Given that, what team has those far away prospects to pay for one of those splendid slingers? A: This brings up a philosophical question: should bad teams have nice things?  Mason Miller provides a reason to watch the A’s, and his season has been insane so far.  And while he’s under team control through the 2029 season, we can’t count on him to hold up or on this franchise to be willing to pay him those last few years if he does. So the cold-hearted logical answer is for the A’s to trade Miller as soon as possible, as he might be at peak value and could be a lot less valuable the next time this organization has a realistic shot at contending.  (I am aware that the A’s are not awful so far this year at 15-17, but I do not think they have a realistic chance at making the playoffs anytime soon). It’s worth considering that Miller was a starter in college and all through the minors.  He came down with a “mild UCL sprain” in mid-May of last year, which involved a four-month recovery period and short appearances when he returned in September. A’s GM David Forst explained to MLB.com’s Martin Gallegos last Decemberthat he’d like to see Miller stay healthy for a year as a reliever before the team considers moving him back into a starting role.  When a pitcher excels as a closer to the degree Miller has thus far, it’s often hard to get him out of that role, but if he can eventually transition back to starting, he could theoretically be even more valuable.  But given last year’s UCL sprain and the attrition rate of the game’s hardest throwers, there’s a pretty good case that Miller is indeed at peak value right now. I don’t know where the hell the A’s are going to be (as an organization) in 2026, when Miller will receive his first arbitration salary. Given the extra uncertainty around the franchise these next few years, Phillip’s case makes some sense: trade Miller (and/or Erceg) now for prospects who are several years away from the Majors. The problem with this idea is that a prospect’s uncertainty is higher the further away he is from the Majors.  Trading Miller this summer might require threading the following needles: The other team is very much in win-now mode The headline prospects you get back should be position players, since this is about mitigating risk The headline prospects you get back should perhaps be in Double-A: close enough to the Majors to have some certainty, but far enough away where you could wait at least a year to promote them So, top-ranked Double-A position player prospects on win-now somewhat likely (40% or better chance) playoff teams: Samuel Basallo, Orioles catcher Chase DeLauter, Guardians outfielder Cole Young, Mariners infielder Harry Ford, Mariners catcher Emmanuel Rodriguez, Twins outfielder Matt Shaw, Cubs infielder Kevin Alcántara, Cubs outfielder James Triantos, Cubs second baseman Dalton Rushing, Dodgers catcher/DH Spencer Jones, Yankees outfielder Jacob Melton, Astros outfielder A lot of these teams are able to assemble good bullpens without giving up top prospects, and therefore might not be in the Miller bidding.  The Cubs, though, are a good example of a team with the type of prospect that it could make sense to flip for Miller.  It all might be too cute, though – maybe just enjoy Miller where he is now.  It’s also worth keeping in mind that the A’s have not exactly hit home runs in trying to convert established good players like Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Chris Bassitt, and Sean Manaea into prospects.  
    • Anyone catching the game on MLB TV tonight?  I’ll probably have it on given the relative lack of other baseball options this evening. 
    • Bradish was great but yeah I vote for the Yankees infield. LOL. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...