Jump to content

Dwight Smith Jr worth a look?


jamalshw

Recommended Posts

It appears the Jays have DFA'ed Dwight Smith Jr. He appears to still have an option and while our OF is probably one of our deeper areas going forward, Smith may be an interesting guy who has looked good in small samples in the big leagues. Is he worth a look?

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Appropos of nothing, I heard Hyde talking about Young on 105.7 this AM. Either he or the radio guy mentioned that Young wants to get into coaching. 

This has been mentioned in a number of places. I wouldn't be upset if they decide to keep EYJ around this season. He'll know his role and be supportive in the locker room. Another Rickard type is only marginally more interesting. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Seems like a poor man's Joey Rickard to me. Although I agree he is more interesting than Eric Young, Jr.

Not saying Young is great, but he can steal bases, get on base and is batting .350+. Plus our goal is to lose really so....maybe we can get everyone's fav David Lough and Travis Snider back:)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Yaz meet Dwight Smith Jr., Dwight Smith Jr., meet Yaz. You guys are the same player.

Except one was drafted in the 1st round, and one was drafted in the 14th.   And the former first rounder is over 2 years younger.

At least at one point in the past they weren't the same player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Except one was drafted in the 1st round, and one was drafted in the 14th.   And the former first rounder is over 2 years younger.

At least at one point in the past they weren't the same player.

The thing I can always expect on the Hangout is on a throwaway funny line, that someone will come back and look at it with a microscope to see if said line is 1000% accurate.

They are the same player now, in other words, why go out and get a guy who you already have in your organization. In other words, PASS. At no point was I referring to their draft position or their choice of clothes, or their current marital status, just quite simply they would bring a similar skill set and the team already cut that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In AAA, .355 OBP, 91k/124BB, in 810 PA. He’s LH. 

Sorry Hanser but Smith is a better fit. Or we could get rid of one of our 20 RP on the 40 man. It sounds like Osich has some potential. Is Arajuo really that good?  We’re keeping him just because he’d have 3 options?  I don’t see him surviving next offseason when we have to add prospects to the 40 man. Same thing with Means. It seems like he was just right place/right time, rather than belonging on the 40 man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Unless one of Cowser, Heston or Stowers wakes up one morning as a RHed batter or switch hitter, I don't think the veteran OFs are going anywhere. Urias and Mateo are a different story. One of them should go tp clear a roster spot. For me, Urias is an easy choice to be the one sent packing, whether with nothing in return or a lottery-ticket pitching prospect who throws hard (or two), but I understand that others disagree. And maybe they're both gone. One of the unknowables about this team is whether Jackson Holliday can be a useful part of it later this season.
    • The Orioles always seem to give a guy the day off after his first day back post-injury. They've done that with a lot of guys on the ML team, and I suspect they are just treating Holliday very carefully. 
    • Wow its finally here. I've been looking for this since January thanks for posting.
    • We REALLY need to get Suarez out of this rotation. It's been fun, but he's hitting a wall and really should be a reliever. Kremer soon, I guess. 
    • Yeah it would, then the question is . What is their definition of “ off the rails “ ?  Either way, we get the answer within 30 days 
    • You totally negate your argument to keep him when you say you don't think he would return anyone that would make it worthwhile. I think Mountcastle is a good clubhouse guy and has been a very solid player.  I was happy that the Orioles moved Mancini to Houston to make room for Mountcastle.  A similar move here could be beneficial.   The situations are not identical.  Mancini was a pending free agent and even though the Orioles were in the hunt of a playoff, they were not considered a contender.  So moving Mancini brought us back useful pieces AND allowed Mountcastle to step in. IF the Orioles move Mountcastle, they need to get SP or RP to help now, right?  It would be pretty ballsy to trade him for minor league pitching depth only.  I think Kjerstad or Mayo could outhit him the rest of the way, but I just don't think you move him unless it is for pitching that can help now. And to your point, I think Mountcastle could return pitching help.  Absolutely.  
    • There are times I forget that Ryan Mountcastle is only 27-years-old and we have 2.5 years of control remaining.  It seems like he should be close to 29-30.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...