Jump to content

Alex Wells 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

My totally unproven theory is that Elias/Sig really focus on changing eye levels to inflate K rates (not just eye levels, but it's an important piece). The problem is that as hitters get better, letter-high fastballs and generally mistakes up in the zone get turned around more and more. That's one way that stuff starts to differentiate these guys, and guys with lesser stuff give up more home runs.

This has always been true, of course. It's just my little theory as to why K rates are so impressive this year for so many guys whose prospect sheet looks more like Mark Buehrle's than Nolan Ryan's. It seems like Lowther's fastball still plays (I believe Luke/Tony mentioned he has a high spin rate). It seems like Wells has to rely on doing it the more traditional way (changing speeds/locating).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get people’s tempered enthusiasm, but at what point does this guy get the prospect respect he deserves? He is young for AA and dominating.  Sure the K’s have never blown you away, but the ERA and WHIP always have been very good to superlative.   I’m not going as far as to say he has TOR ability, but he’s following Means lead to a tee.  Speaking of Means nobody including me thought he had TOR ability but I’m beginning to wonder if it’s possible. So why not Wells too? 

Edited by Punchandjudy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Punchandjudy said:

I get people’s tempered enthusiasm, but at what point does this guy get the prospect respect he deserves? He is young for AA and dominating.  Sure the K’s have never blown you away, but the ERA and WHIP always have been very good to superlative.   I’m not going as far as to say he has TOR ability, but he’s following Means lead to a tee.  Speaking of Means nobody including me thought he had TOR ability but I’m beginning to wonder if it’s possible. So why not Wells too? 

I'll start buying it when he can do it with ML balls.

As for Means, the stuff changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn’t matter where he’s ranked or what us message board dudes think about him. He will get more love when he moves up and performs. Then he’ll get love when he does that again. Just like Means. If he’s that good, he’ll drag fans into his bandwagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Have you been following AAA at all this year?

So again you miss the point and just decide to be argumentative for I guess the sake of being argumentative instead of reading posts and debating the merits of the post.  Well I’ll play along, are you saying that Harbor Park isn’t a notorious pitcher’s park? Are you saying the PCL portion of AAA doesn’t have inflated stats?  Have those things changed? 

I guess if you use non sequiturs to make a point then you win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Punchandjudy said:

So again you miss the point and just decide to be argumentative for I guess the sake of being argumentative instead of reading posts and debating the merits of the post.  Well I’ll play along, are you saying that Harbor Park isn’t a notorious pitcher’s park? Are you saying the PCL portion of AAA doesn’t have inflated stats?  Have those things changed? 

I guess if you use non sequiturs to make a point then you win.

I just assume folks know basic facts and don't need to be told them.   It is supposed to cut down on the clutter.

AAA is using ML baseballs instead of minor league baseballs this season.  It is causing a huge increase in offense, so much so that Harbor Park would not be considered a pitcher's park compared to the environments he has pitched at in the past.

If he can get results with the ML balls I would start taking his prospect status seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I need to explain what a non sequitur is please let me know.  I usually think people know what google is, and should not need to explain it.  In the above “debate,” introducing the ML baseball into the argument is a non sequitur.  It does not change the argument as it applies to everyone equally; but again if you think it makes your point fine, you win.  Except that you don’t, unless you are comparing apples to oranges. 

I like Alex Wells.  I wish he had a higher K rate but I will say his success at a young age relative to his competition warrants another look as to his prospect status as John Means has shown us all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don't like the idea of moving an arm we have under control for 6 years for an arm we would have under control for 3 months.  Especially since there are a ton of question marks on that arm of the 3 month rental.  I think McDermott could be a pretty special pitcher if things fall into place.  I'd hold on to that lottery ticket.  I'd look to move someone else at a position of redundancy.  
    • I thought you were talking about possible selections a team could have made.  For example, the Nats could have taken Harper and Realmuto.  Or the Orioles could have had Machado and Realmuto.  Now I see what you are saying though.  You are saying the Orioles had the best draft of the past 20 years and that draft was heavy in good position players so it was smart for them to take that tact.  At first, I thought you were arguing the Orioles got lucky because the 2019 draft was particularly strong and in no draft of the past 20 years could one team have gotten two players of the caliber of Adley and Gunnar at the positions that the Orioles chose.  
    • I completely agree with this.  Most of this damage has already been done.  Travel teams have ruined many kids and have left others far more susceptible to injury in the minors and majors.  
    • I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.
    • Just getting caught up here, so my first reaction to trading JW is NOOOOOO! However, I think most people around baseball would have to agree that he's a dude. He's become my favorite Oriole just because of his approach at the plate and also his workman-like attitude. Leaving out my preferences and putting on my front office hat I have to admit he would be attractive to other teams for his ability to play three positions in the IF and his steady performance with the bat. And unlike Holliday, he's proven himself.  While Holliday is the more high profile guy to other teams I'm not sure he's seen as more valuable. JW can play SS-has the arm for it-and he's versatile. I think Holliday could learn to play 2B but has neither the arm for 3B or SS. He likely has more range and as earlier stated by another poster, some team may want to try him at SS. Maybe that works, maybe it doesn't.  I feel like I'm making the case to keep JW and trade JH. Back to the question, which guy gets the Orioles what they need to be the favorite going into the playoffs? Number one pick or a guy who's a ML starter right now? Let's set that aside, maybe it's either one. Can either of them get us Skubal in the right package? Yes. That's the guy who IS a ML pitcher and who will move the needle. What's the package? Elias has earned some level of baseball knowledge with the Burnes trade and the trade that sent Bundy to the Angels when Elias first arrived. That one was even more evidence of his ability to read the tea leaves. So, I trust he'll make it work. I may not like the immediate results (i.e. trading Westy or Kjerstad), but if he can get Skubal in the right deal I'd make the deal. But Scherzer is a good back up and won't cost nearly as much.
    • 39 Yacqui Rivera - he was the PTBNL in the Scott/Sulser deal along with the comp pick.  Juan Nunez - he was the 3rd piece in the Jorge Lopez trade with the Twins along with Povich/Cano/4th piece
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...